So, any interest in Dustin Keller?

I think he is pretty good

I'd bring him in. Not his fault hes playing with sanchez and shottenimer/sporano offenses.

Absolutely.

whelmed, but not overly.

Dustin Keller appears to be a better or more experienced version of Michael Egnew. A version of Michael Egnew that is proven to be at least a little effective in the NFL.

If the asking price isn't too steep, I'd sure take a look.

Surprising if they do end up letting him go. I thought he was one of sanchez's favorite targets. I'm all for bringing him in.

Only if he brings a lock of sanchez's hair for me. <3

plz

Another thread ruined by lucky.

It's like Michael Egnew being inactive. Never fails.

Well I've been called a lot of things in my life. Michael Egnew has never been one of them.

Would prefer Fred Davis.

"Stringer Bell wrote:

Would prefer Fred Davis.

The idiot factor is strong w that one.

"Rocky Raccoon wrote:

Another thread ruined by lucky.

It's like Michael Egnew being inactive. Never fails.

This thread was ruined when you started it.

/I kid I kid

"SICK wrote:

This thread was ruined when you started it.

/I kid I kid

Please. I keep this place afloat!

I laughed pretty hard when a guy I know started tweeting about how Inactive Egnew sounds like a children's cautionary tale about a fat kid.

"Rocky Raccoon wrote:

Please. I keep this place afloat!

In your own world Rocky, in your own world.

I think ultimately you got to look into the position in the context of Joe Philbin/Mike Sherman's offense. A guy who can't block in-line is going to be split wide.

Dustin Keller is a bad in-line blocker, but he's a better receiver from that position than he is split wide, which I think might be problematic. I don't know if he can play an H-Back position as well as Charles Clay either.

Jared Cook I think is a pretty nice alternative. He's basically a giant slot receiver, he's running nearly 80% of his routes from the slot.

I think it's also possible that Antonio Gates and Jermichael Finley are on the open market or up for trade.

Keller is soft.

Martellus Bennett

"miamiron wrote:

Martellus Bennett

What makes him all that different from Anthony Fasano?

"Disgustipate wrote:

I think ultimately you got to look into the position in the context of Joe Philbin/Mike Sherman's offense. A guy who can't block in-line is going to be split wide.

Dustin Keller is a bad in-line blocker, but he's a better receiver from that position than he is split wide, which I think might be problematic. I don't know if he can play an H-Back position as well as Charles Clay either.

Jared Cook I think is a pretty nice alternative. He's basically a giant slot receiver, he's running nearly 80% of his routes from the slot.

I think it's also possible that Antonio Gates and Jermichael Finley are on the open market or up for trade.

"alen1 wrote:

Keller is soft.

If these things are true, then why draft Egnew?

Their interest in Egnew indicates that Keller would generate interest?

Were Egnew and Keller not similar players with similar strengths and weaknesses coming out of college?

I would rather pick up one of Eiffert/Fauria/Toilolo/Ertz through the draft than sign one of the would be FAs.

"ckparrothead wrote:

I laughed pretty hard when a guy I know started tweeting about how Inactive Egnew sounds like a children's cautionary tale about a fat kid.

:sidelol:

"Eop05 wrote:

If these things are true, then why draft Egnew?

Their interest in Egnew indicates that Keller would generate interest?

Were Egnew and Keller not similar players with similar strengths and weaknesses coming out of college?

I think Egnew is a guy you can split out wide, Keller not so much.