So did Tannenbaum want Shanahan,but Ross wanted Gase?

39 replies

JOJonathan KellerNew MemberOP
Jan 13, 2016, 11:53 PM

Gase wasn't the only one who got interviewed twice. Ross and Tannenbaum interviewed Mike Shanahan in the regular season. December 20th I believe and then he was the first candidate to get interviewed in the offseason. And then there's rumors going around that if Tannenbaum didn't hire Gase,he would be fired. I'M NOT SAYING THESE RUMORS ARE TRUE. They come from Jason La Canfora after all.

But if they are true. Does this mean that Tannenbaum wanted experience in Mike Shanahan, but Ross forced Gase down his throat?. You're comments on this?

HERE IS THE LINK! http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/25445341/inside-football-adam-gase-is-entering-treacherous-waters-in-miami

Fin DFin Dforum_veteran
Jan 13, 2016, 11:54 PM

"Jonathan Keller wrote:

Gase wasn't the only one who got interviewed twice. Ross and Tannenbaum interviewed Mike Shanahan in the regular season. December 20th I believe and then he was the first candidate to get interviewed in the offseason. And then there's rumors going around that if Tannenbaum didn't hire Gase,he would be fired. I'M NOT SAYING THESE RUMORS ARE TRUE. They come from Jason La Canfora after all.

But if they are true. Does this mean that Tannenbaum wanted experience in Mike Shanahan, but Ross forced Gase down his throat?. You're comments on this?

Where are those rumors?

ROroy_miamiforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 12:04 AM

I would say Ross definitely wanted Gase. He said this time around he wanted to go with his gut (as opposed to the committee convincing him to hire Philbin). Maybe Gase was Tannenbaum's top choice as well but I believe Ross would have put his foot down on this decision.

CitizenSnipsCitizenSnipsNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 01:26 AM

I'd read that Tannenbaum wanted marrone..

Georgia FinGeorgia Finforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 06:56 AM

I haven't seen any of that but then again I don't pay any attention to La Confora.

It's the gift that keeps on giving.

CrunchTimeCrunchTimeretired_admin
Jan 14, 2016, 07:08 AM

He would have been a good match IMO but I am intrigued with the selection of Gaze .
BTW Coughlin was also considered but in the final analysis they wanted someone who proyected into the future more.

Georgia FinGeorgia Finforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 07:17 AM

"CrunchTime wrote:

He would have been a good match IMO but I am intrigued with the selection of Gaze .
BTW Coughlin was also considered but in the final analysis they wanted someone who proyected into the future more.

Agreed, I was calling for Shanahan since Joe was shown the door but deep down inside I knew it made too much sense to happen here in bizzaro world.

It's the gift that keeps on giving.

MonstBlitzMonstBlitzforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 07:39 AM

If Ross was the one who had final say over head coach then the Miami Dolphins are in big trouble. Why hire a football "czar" if you aren't going to let him decide what football people to hire?

JOJonathan KellerNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 07:48 AM

"MonstBlitz wrote:

If Ross was the one who had final say over head coach then the Miami Dolphins are in big trouble. Why hire a football "czar" if you aren't going to let him decide what football people to hire?

Of course Ross had the final say over the Head Coach. He's the owner!

Rick 1966Rick 1966forum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 08:03 AM

I'd rather have had Shannahan, but maybe Gase will surprise me.

dolphin25dolphin25forum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 08:17 AM

I read that all the people were ranked 1 to 6 from several people (including Marino) and Gase came out on top.

Lord help us.

gunn34gunn34New Member
Jan 14, 2016, 08:25 AM

"MonstBlitz wrote:

If Ross was the one who had final say over head coach then the Miami Dolphins are in big trouble. Why hire a football "czar" if you aren't going to let him decide what football people to hire?

"Rick 1966 wrote:

I'd rather have had Shannahan, but maybe Gase will surprise me.

These two are the same thoughts I have.

bakedmattbakedmattNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 08:31 AM

According to my source, Ross wanted to hire two head coaches, but Tannenbaum didn't want to hire any coaches and instead wanted to insert himself as the coach.

@matthewfpepin

RachelDRachelDNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 10:40 AM

I wanted no part of Marrone to be part of this team, a souless jerk and overall bad coach. I'm glad that Ross finally stepped in and did something that most will be happy with and went with the correct decision instead of listening to "Milk-Shake Mike"

FinsterFinsterNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 10:49 AM

It wouldn't surprise me in the least.

Tin IndianTin Indianforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 10:49 AM

Well if my two choices are between Shannahan and Gase I can tell you it's not a washed up old coach like Mike Shannahan. All you Shannahan supporters tell me where or when he has been successful since he left Denver?

2 Super Bowl rings nearly twenty years ago and nothing of real merit since then does nothing to make him a better choice than Gase. I'd rather go with the guy whose needle is pointing up than a guy with it pointing down.

Not My Circus, Not My Monkeys.

Rock SextonRock Sextonforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 10:56 AM

Shanahan and Jackon would have been infinitely better hires IMO.

Fin DFin Dforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 10:57 AM

"Tin Indian wrote:

Well if my two choices are between Shannahan and Gase I can tell you it's not a washed up old coach like Mike Shannahan. All you Shannahan supporters tell me where or when he has been successful since he left Denver?

2 Super Bowl rings nearly twenty years ago and nothing of real merit since then does nothing to make him a better choice than Gase. I'd rather go with the guy whose needle is pointing up than a guy with it pointing down.

I had 5 guys I would be happy to sign, Shula, Jackson, Gase, Coughlin and Shanahan.

Shanahan didn't actually do that badly in Washington. It was the FO and ownership that handicapped him severely.

Tannehill and Miller are basically made for a Shanahan offense.

Tin IndianTin Indianforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 11:12 AM

If you throw Hugh Jackson into the mix, that was my first choice. He did a good job in his one season in Oakland. It was foolish for them to let him go after one year.
Glad to see he has another chance in Cleveland.

Not My Circus, Not My Monkeys.

Rock SextonRock Sextonforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 11:13 AM

"Tin Indian wrote:

If you throw Hugh Jackson into the mix, that was my first choice. He did a good job in his one season in Oakland. It was foolish for them to let him go after one year.
Glad to see he has another chance in Cleveland.

I was shocked he wanted the Cleveland job. I think Haslam finally lucked out.

Tin IndianTin Indianforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 11:17 AM

"Rock Sexton wrote:

I was shocked he wanted the Cleveland job. I think Haslam finally lucked out.

Agreed. Must have been one heck of a sales job by Haslam. He must have given Jackson the ability to bring in his own GM or something.

That is one of the few places that has been a bigger dumpster fire than Miami.

Not My Circus, Not My Monkeys.

AguaAguaforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 11:20 AM

"MonstBlitz wrote:

If Ross was the one who had final say over head coach then the Miami Dolphins are in big trouble. Why hire a football "czar" if you aren't going to let him decide what football people to hire?

Because it's Tannenbaum.

75757bredNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 11:30 AM

"Rock Sexton wrote:

Shanahan and Jackon would have been infinitely better hires IMO.

This....having a 1st time GM, HC, and DC scares me. Going to remain optimistic though.

Rock SextonRock Sextonforum_veteran
Jan 14, 2016, 11:34 AM

"757bred wrote:

This....having a 1st time GM, HC, and DC scares me. Going to remain optimistic though.

Gonna be quite the learning curve we will be forced to sit through.

RachelDRachelDNew Member
Jan 14, 2016, 11:34 AM

"757bred wrote:

This....having a 1st time GM, HC, and DC scares me. Going to remain optimistic though.

Well, Tannenbaum is the GM, Grier is basically the scout with better pay at this point.

Log in to reply.