1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sports Buzz - Draft pundits suggest the first pick for the Dolphins

Discussion in 'NFL Draft Forum' started by CrunchTime, Apr 19, 2013.

  1. CrunchTime

    CrunchTime Administrator Retired Administrator

    23,327
    35,934
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    http://miamiherald.typepad.com/sports-buzz/


    See what the other pundits have to say .None of the pundits suggested taking Tyler Eifert or Tavon Austin .
     
    ssmiami and Da 'Fins like this.
  2. Da 'Fins

    Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member

    34,984
    48,450
    113
    Dec 19, 2007
    Birmingham, AL
    I like Hayden but would trade out of 12.

    As many needs as there are (DE, CB, OT, OG, OLB, DT, WR still, S) I'd want to trade down maybe a couple of times into the low 20's and get as many 2nd / 3rd rounders as possible and still think we could draft Hayden there. I'd esp. want to do so if we landed Albert in a trade - to give us another 2nd.

    Multiple picks are key.

    Also, I like Fluker, but he has too many liabilities in pass pro, imo, to draft him at 12 (or for him to go in the top 10 as Mayock thinks). I think he holds better value at 18-20 and beyond.
     
  3. jim1

    jim1 New Member

    5,902
    3,054
    0
    Jul 1, 2008
    I prefer Watson, but Fluker is one heck of a RT imo, maybe a target if we trade down. I watched a lot of film of DEs going up against Fluker, and from what I saw he pretty much handled all of them. A beast in the run game and pretty solid in pass pro, this guy is a really good RT.
     
  4. KB21

    KB21 Almost Never Wrong Club Member

    24,029
    40,478
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    In a power man scheme he would be great. In a zone scheme, I think his lack of movement skills would render him a below average tackle. The guy cannot move his feet at all.
     
  5. jim1

    jim1 New Member

    5,902
    3,054
    0
    Jul 1, 2008
    He's not the nimblest of guys, but from what I saw he was effective in pass pro. Not the best fit I agree, and again I prefer Watson, but Fluker is a darned good player imo.

    Here's some film- you can see the lack of quickness at :22 and elsewhere, he's just not the most agile player. Again, if I'm going RT early then Watson is my guy. If we go LT I was impressed with David Bakhtiari.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6eoZdR-ZTQ

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEwGbfY8rQ8

    You're on the mark, Fluker would be better in a power scheme.
     
  6. Da 'Fins

    Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member

    34,984
    48,450
    113
    Dec 19, 2007
    Birmingham, AL
    There are a lot of quick DEs in the NFL who play on Fluker's side (some of the quickest pass rushers in the past few years attacked from there - including Wake and Freeney) - Fluker's inability to move his feet quickly would make it tough for him there which is why I think his value is lower in round 1. He does have incredible arms (his wing span is 86 inches!) and he's very strong and powerful. And, well-coached and a hard worker as best I can tell from watching him here in AL.

    Watson does seem like a better fit in our scheme with better agility.
     

Share This Page