Slow news day - chattering about Suh happening.
-
I don't blame the failures of the last few years on Suh at all. But the signing was an example of what not to do in the future.
Bumrush, Agua, texanphinatic and 1 other person like this. -
I don't really see how there would be. The problem was Tannenbaum. I have never seen a team built around an interior defensive tackle. Additionally, what we paid him was absurd.
As far as FA signings go, he played well, but again, what we paid him made it almost impossible to fulfill expectations. If we had him at even close to a reasonable cap number, I am confident that he would still be on the team. -
He seemed like he always had a good relationship with Steve Ross and did his business entrepreneur seminars and stuff with wake if i remember correctly. Do you think he would want to come back to the phins if he wins his ring with the rams seeing as how we have a new defensive minded staff? No TBam and no Gase, same ross, Grier and a new defensive coach...maybe?
-
Mafioso likes this.
-
Suh was never a real problem. He played about as expected from the position. Problem is it was too much money for the position. I don't care who the player is, that position is not worth THAT much money when you're building a team.
Surfs Up 99 likes this. -
He should send Gase and Ross a box of chocolates...Thanks for letting me go to the Super Bowl!
-
Why should he apologize for all that money?
-
Dolphin Dundee likes this.
-
The Suh signing was an interesting roll of the dice based upon perception rather than realistic expectation. He had a rep (and film) as the most dominant and more importantly, disruptive force of nature the DT spot had ever seen. It’s possible he could have been worth every penny if he was blowing up lineman for pressure and tackles for loss every fourth play. Look at the Packers and Reggie White or imagine signing Bruce Smith in his prime. Unfortunately, he was just an elite DT and not a once in a generation freak while here. I don’t blame them one bit for trying, nor for moving on.
Tin Indian, KeyFin and Pauly like this. -
Sportrac estimates the market value for his next contract should be $9.3m/year.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/los-angeles-rams/ndamukong-suh-6511/market-value/ -
KeyFin likes this.
-
Why would he be mad at us releasing him? He's playing for a ring. Meanwhile, some here still debate whether bringing Tannehill back under center is a good idea.
-
That was one guy I didn't want to see go. Losing both him and Landry hurt me personally as a fan, but it is what it is at this point. Can't worry about what was. Hopefully Suh is a major contributor towards the Rams winning the Super Bowl.
-
I'd give that type of money to a Daryl Williams....maybe even a Trent Brown. -
- No, beyond a long term contract extension for Tunsil, I don't want to sign any overpriced linemen this year, with the possible exception of what needs to be done to retain J. James. I don't see any of the younger ones as being worth the cost and investment, and the older ones likely will have lost the skills and value by the time that the rest of the team catches up in a few years, even if everything goes well. Better to draft and develop our own for now, then look at it again in a year.
-
-
-
This coming season is going to suck. I've chosen to just accept that, and decide that any money spent in 2019 is basically wasted. Better to save it for later, which is very possible with cap rollover. -
Since this is a Suh thread, I'll just say that I'll be sad if he doesn't rupture Brady's testicles on a ridiculous sack tomorrow. Go Rams!
Surfs Up 99 likes this. -
-
I think that this will be the year that I go into the whole process with the lowest of expectations, from day one. 2004 went south really fast, but I still had expectations up until Ricky quit.
I would say that my lowest expectations, starting in January, were those for 2000 after Dan and Jimmy retired, and I still had the taste of 62-7 in my mouth. I really figured that 2000 would be a five or six win rebuilding and transition year, that the offense needed to be built from the ground up, and then we'd see how 2001 looked. Of course, the team then went on to have its best defensive season since the early 70s, and that combined with a weak division was enough for eleven wins despite the limited talent on offense. However, that surprising season also might have slowed down or flat out stopped what should have been an urgent need to inject talented offensive players into the club, and we all know what happened during the next draft....
My expectations for 2005 and 2008 were also fairly low, but in each case we had a big name guy taking over the franchise, and there was a lot of built in excitement for that, even though I was uneasy about them. This time, we've got zilch coming on board, so that just isn't there this time. My expectations are at the very, very bottom.KeyFin likes this. -
I'll tell you what would get me excited though- if we start trading back in the draft and loading up on picks for 2020. -
But I absolutely want to watch every snap of every game of every season. Living through the hard times will make the good times even sweeter when they get here.KeyFin likes this. -
Is Direct TV going out? That's crazy- they updated their menus last week! I've been thinking about canceling that as well just because the cost keeps going up and up. If I lived in an area with great internet I'd just get Hulu & Netflix, stream it on my TV's and be done with it.Surfs Up 99 likes this. -
-
I don't enjoy going to the bar every week. They unfortunately only put one game on with sound, and the rest are on mute, but it is what it is. I do what I can until something better is there.KeyFin likes this. -
LOL, T-Mobile is the nation's best friend for severely undercutting everyone else and forcing them to compete. -
That still leaves people who live in rural areas out in the cold though. Anyone with a clear view of the sky can get satellite, but you have to live near a tower to get cell coverage. -
From what they're saying, trees or weather won't make a huge difference in signal....so rural folks should benefit from this the most.
The other difference is that 5G is approximately 10x faster with very low latency. Verizon's initial 5G is delivering an average of 300 MB/s download and they expect to at least double that before their roll-out nationwide. That's actually faster than satellite TV signals so there's no need for cable or Direct TV anymore...we can just stream everything (you could download a full movie in 1080 resolution in under 10 seconds). DSL will be history as well as soon as 5G is affordable enough to edge it out (likely early to mid 2020). Very few companies are laying fiber anymore since 5G will be so much cheaper to implement.
Because of the speeds and minimal costs, a lot we do will move to the cloud and our homes will start having "smart everything" in the next few years. Want to brew a cup of coffee in the kitchen from your bed? No problem, there's an app for that. We'll be updating all sorts of household items as the new versions tie into our smartphones...it's called the Internet of Things (IoT) and it's going to get ridiculous very fast.
Soon you'll be able to pilot you lawnmower from your living room like it's a drone- and it will memorize the route for next time on it's own w/ on-board cameras to avoid stuff laying around the yard (the same tech in new cars). Cool toys galore are on their way!Last edited: Feb 3, 2019patcobb and Unlucky 13 like this.