i know everyone kept mentioning brady not playing......but brady doesnt play linebacker.....we demolished the defense, and had 3 drives over 70 yards....and took chunks of minutes off the clock, even if they had brady he wouldve been on the sidelines watching those drives.....
The thing is, until we do this again and more consistently, it'll always the be the "Brady-less Pats" we beat. Even tho, as was pointed out, there's more to the Pats than Brady. It wasn't Brady that allowed us to score 38 points. Credibility is earned and we've made one stride to earning that credibility. Next up, the Chargers...then the next team...etc
good point....but you see, those same patsie fans who say "you beat the brady-less pats" are the ones that dont give a damn when dissing us for being 1-15.....even though we had 60 injuries...i mean for christ-sakes we had cleo lemon handing the ball off the samkon gado........but they wont take that into account....so screw them!
They are Patriots fans. If they had any idea about football, they would not be Patriot fans. So cut em some slack
I pointed this out in the Club Level, the Pats were still considered contenders by almost everyone even wthout Brady, so that excuse doesnt fly.
Brady will always have nightmares of #99 chasing him around the backfield. If he had played Sunday he would have been rudely introduced to Mr. Porter!
no he doesnt but if he was playing they quite possible would have been able to eat more clock themselves and convert a few of those first downs and burnt us deep.. Would we have scored 38 points? I dunno but the lack of production on offense does effect your defense...