T Carl Nicks' stock dropping?

10 replies

Paul 13Paul 13moderatorOP
Apr 20, 2008, 12:33 PM

He's rated as the 12th highest tackle over at NFL Draft Scout. They have him going in the FOURTH ROUND!

I seriously doubt he'd last that long and feel he would be a great pickup at 57 for us. But if we could wait until the top of round four and get him there? wow...

Does the arrest stemming from a party incident in Lincoln merit the stock drop? Not in my book, there are players in this draft that have done (allegedly) much worse than fail to disperse, ie leave a party.

Twitter @Silver_Hornet (follow me and I'll follow you, just let me know who you are on here!

Liverpool FC Discussion Thread

padre31padre31luxury_box
Apr 20, 2008, 12:35 PM

Well, he is 25, and has had one good season in college, he was a workout warrior though.

4th round? I'd love to have him with our #96 pick...

adamprez2003adamprez2003forum_veteran
Apr 20, 2008, 12:42 PM

yeah it dropped quite a bit apparently. the best thing about him is he's big. his technique is disgusting though. he's a major project that you wont see any returns on for at least one to two years



2019 DRAFT WISH LIST
1) DT Dexter Lawrence - Clemson
2) DE Jaylon Ferguson - Lousiana Tech
3) OG Chris Lindstrom - Boston College
4) CB Amani Oruwariye - Penn State
5) DE Shareef Miller - Penn State
7) C Sean Krepcz - Nevada
7) RB Wes Hills - Slippery Rock

Reporter: "Why did you fire Coach Gase?"
Ross: "Because he wants to win now"

ALalen1New Member
Apr 20, 2008, 12:49 PM

Maybe its the character concerns?

Section126Section126luxury_box
Apr 20, 2008, 03:34 PM

"alen1 wrote:

Maybe its the character concerns?

Maybe it's because he can't play.

I would hold my nose and take him int he 4th round..only because maybe some of these scouts might be right and he represents value there. But I don't like him.

@Alf_Arteaga on Twitter
"Being a part of success is more important than being personally indispensable. .''...- Pat Riley
3 Yards per Carry on itunes:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/3-yards-per-carry-miami-dolphins/id1363764781?mt=2
3 Yards per Carry for Android:
https://threeyardspercarry.podbean.com/

VendigoVendigosubscriber
Apr 20, 2008, 03:40 PM

"Paul 13 wrote:

Does the arrest stemming from a party incident in Lincoln merit the stock drop? Not in my book, there are players in this draft that have done (allegedly) much worse than fail to disperse, ie leave a party.

Carl Nicks was actually banned from attending his own Pro Day, while other players who were involved in that incident were allowed to participate. This alone tells you that this was certainly not the first incident he was involved in, and yes, a player getting banned from his own Pro Day definitely merits a downgrade - I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see some teams taking him of the board completely. For what it's worth: I wouldn't touch him after this issue, not even in the 4th round. That's a huge red flag.

We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only reason for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely. All art is quite useless.

BuckeyeKingBuckeyeKingNew Member
Apr 20, 2008, 04:28 PM

Oh please such a overblown issue. Wow got in trouble at a COLLEGE PARTY. There were 2 guys banned from the Nebraska pro day Nicks and Purify. They were both involoved. Has minor character issues and would be a steal in round 4.

VendigoVendigosubscriber
Apr 20, 2008, 04:32 PM

"BuckeyeKing wrote:

There were 2 guys banned from the Nebraska pro day Nicks and Purify. They were both involoved.

Yes. And to my knowledge there were a couple of other players that were also involved in the party incident and didn't get banned. Which begs the question: Why is that? Stands to reason that this wasn't Nick's and Purify's first incident. No college is going to ban them for that issue.

We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only reason for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely. All art is quite useless.

BuckeyeKingBuckeyeKingNew Member
Apr 20, 2008, 04:59 PM

"Vendigo wrote:

Yes. And to my knowledge there were a couple of other players that were also involved in the party incident and didn't get banned. Which begs the question: Why is that? Stands to reason that this wasn't Nick's and Purify's first incident. No college is going to ban them for that issue.

Well from what I read they both just failed to disperse like everyone else. From what I heard Nicks failed to leave when asked.

Really isnt a big deal.

VendigoVendigosubscriber
Apr 20, 2008, 05:06 PM

"BuckeyeKing wrote:

Really isnt a big deal.

That's exactly what makes we wonder. I've never heard of a college banning players from their Pro Day because of such a trifle. And I've rarely heard of NFL teams downgrading players that severely because of it. Something doesn't sound right there. I wouldn't be surprised to hear about other incidents after the draft. I actually like Nicks as a player, but I'm always wary of guys who seem to get punished way too harsh. That's usually a pretty good indicator that there's more to it than meets the eye.

We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only reason for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely. All art is quite useless.

BuckeyeKingBuckeyeKingNew Member
Apr 20, 2008, 05:31 PM

"Vendigo wrote:

That's exactly what makes we wonder. I've never heard of a college banning players from their Pro Day because of such a trifle. And I've rarely heard of NFL teams downgrading players that severely because of it. Something doesn't sound right there. I wouldn't be surprised to hear about other incidents after the draft. I actually like Nicks as a player, but I'm always wary of guys who seem to get punished way too harsh. That's usually a pretty good indicator that there's more to it than meets the eye.

I think they came down on them because of the circumstances. If you get in trouble with the police you will be barred from the schools proday.

Log in to reply.