Hard to believe? This is what Sparano had to say:
Read the rest....http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/football/story/1297586.html
Tags:
-
-
i've heard jason taylor say similar things. i've heard him talk about all the things you can do to disrupt plays that doesn't show up on the stats.
Jeffrey and dolfan7171 like this. -
Ok....good point. Thanks for that.
-
i can't tell if that's a complement or if you're being sarcastic. the reason i think it might be sarcasm is because i didn't really give any examples of what i was talking about. I just know i've heard JT make a similar comment compared to what sparano said about every play doesn't have to be a sack or int. i just thinkk its neat that our coach and player(s) are on the same page. i believe JT was talking about stuff like forcing a QB to throw it away, batting down passes, or even making a player, like a RB, run away from you and get tackled by someone else for a loss. you know, things that change the outcome of a game and/or play, but doesn't show up on the stat sheets.dolfan7171 likes this.
-
I agree with the article especially saying consistency is the key. Yes every play doesn't have to end in a sack but it is important to get pressure on Brees so as not to give him a chance to think and cause him to throw some bad throws. If we let Brees get comfortable it will get bad because Brees is a top qb in the league on a great team. This is a very important week for the defense they need to step up and not give up big plays or miss tackles. The Saints are a great team the Fins need to be at their best on Sunday.
dolfan7171 likes this. -
I was giving you a complement. You didn't need to give any examples. I remember reading about JT saying the same thing before. You did make a good point and it served as reminder to me since I forgot about that. Sorry about that. I guess I should have rephrased that.RickyNeverInhaled likes this.
-
the only thing i hate about forums is that its easy to take someone the wrong way. lol. that's why i usually ask before jumping to conclusions.
back on topic though, it would be nice to have the total team defense that we had back in the "no name defense" days. i think we can get back to that, even know we have a couple of "names" on our D. We have more of a Team Offense than we do a team defense. that's why i'm glad Sparano is preaching on this subject. -