Via the Miami Herald:
http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nfl/miami-dolphins/article60029376.html
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Im good with all of that. And please for the love of god, end Koa Misi.. please.
-
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
Coples, Suh, Grimes, Jordan, and Misi - I'm all in on.
I'd prefer to keep Wake and try to renegotiate a deal for him that would free up some space. Same with Jordan Cameron.
I'm 50/50 on cutting Jennings. If we can keep our other WR's then yes.
If we cut Grimes we should keep McCain and Taylor. The savings there aren't huge but we still need CBs. If we land another starting CB in free agency and feel good about some other guys (e.g., Lippett) then perhaps release either McCain or Taylor - whichever brings less value to the team by his play. I like McCain over Taylor and the savings are only about $1.5 M. So if either of those were to be released, I'd probably release Taylor. But, occasionally Taylor shows something so it's a tossup. -
I'm fine with all 10 options, and think that many of them are actually necessary. I would prefer to try and bring Cameron back at a lower salary than move on from him, but he can't come back close to his current number. I'd also like to try Taylor at FS. There isn't much to lose by doing so.
-
thetylernator likes this.
-
Of note, Miami has expressed significant interest through the pre-draft process in Miles Killebrew (top rated safety out of Southern Utah), Jack Allen (top rated center/guard out of Michigan State), and Brandon Shell (middle-of-the-pack tackle, son of Art Shell). Correspondingly, Michael Thomas/Louis Delmas, Dallas Thomas, and Jason Fox should be released.
dgfred likes this. -
2. resturcture Suh.....ah yes bump the money until next year - ok but remember one thing, as of now there are only 24 players under contract next year and we will have to sign about 30 with about 60 mill. (savings 18 mil)
3. dudes insane - restructuring is not an option, cutting him and resigning him opens him to possibly looking elsewhere for another deal. If Im Cam Wake I would test the waters.
Cutting or trading him saves 8.4 mill and then he has to be replaced - est savings 4.5 m)
4. Brent Grimes we can restructure and bump to next next season 3.5 of his salary, or we can cut him and replace him saving an estimate of (3m saved)
5. Jordan Cameron - nonsense this guy does not know what he is talking about 5.5 of the 7.5 would come off the books 2m will be dead and then we have to replace him (est net 3m)
6. Dion Jordan - More BS 3 m of his 6.2 salary would stay on the books. then we would have to replace him (est net 0)
7. Greg Jennings - 1.5 of his 5.5 is dead. If we cut him we again have to replace him (est savings 1m)
8. Koa Misi solid yes - worth cutting and taking our chances not so sure 1.2 m is dead, replacing him with an unknown (3.7 saved - new player = est 1.5 saved)
9. Brice McCain - 1 m of his 3.5 m is dead. If we cut him we have to replace him (est savings 0)
10. Jamar Taylor - cut him .25 m dead, savings of .9m - then have to replace him - good luck at that salary (est savings -1.5m)
so totaling up this guys 10 easy ways to make us cap solvent:
about 30 mil - 5 m over = net of 25m if we do what he suggests with a bunch of new unknowns on the roster
We then have the draft and free agency to contend with. Lot more work neededPuka-head, gunn34, Piston Honda and 1 other person like this. -
Cross off 1 and 9.
-
-
I think most of these moves are coming, and wouldn't have a problem with any except Suh, it just doesn't make any sense to restructure his contract this year.
The only reason it would make sense to restructure his contract this year would be if if they thought they were making a SB run next year and had 1 piece they had to sign, because this restructure would mortgage the future.
Restructuring his 28.6 mil this year would just create a 26.6 year, and another 28.6 year and then a 24.9 year, fix one problem year and create 3 more? Why? So we can win the offseason again? That simply isn't a good enough reason, where is the risk/reward there?
Save the restructure for a year when you actually might benefit from it, I'm pretty sure that's why it's in the contract, if you feel like you can take a run at the SB and need some space to sign a certain player, then you can create that space.
It also kills any trade possibilities, say next year some team thinks they are ready to make a run, and are willing to give up two 1st round picks or something, that becomes impossible with this restructure.
They can create a little cap space in other ways, bite the bullet this year and it leaves a much better, and more flexible future.thetylernator, 2socks, shamegame13 and 1 other person like this. -
gunn34 likes this.
-
-
That being said, I agree with you. Restructuring Suh's contract now would be a poor financial decision.Finster likes this. -
I worry about wake because he tore his Achilles. Not a pretty injury. He may never be the same. If hypothetically this is the case then we have a 33 or 34 yr old guy coming off a major injury that isn't what he was. I love the guy but geez we are asking a lot of the guy in a young mans game
Brent Grimes is on the decline. And who the hell would want Miko is their city. JMO.
The other thing is if we don't restructure SUH for the cap room we loose 18 million in cap space. We simply won't have what we need to productively move forward. It almost is not fair, or put in another way a handicap to Gace's success
Simply put - we can not have over 1/4 of our cap tied up in Tannehill and SUH - not and win consistently anyway (40.2 m)
What pisses me off the most is we may finally have a group of coaches that may make some noise. Not so sure Gace was real aware of the cap problems. If he wasn't I bet he is now.Fin4Ever likes this. -
I think the real dilemmas are Wake and Grimes.
Wake - I absolutely agree that coming off an injury, he may never be the same; however, pass rush is so hard to find. Plus, we have to couple this with the possibility that Vernon could be gone. I really don't think that we could even hope to do better than Wake in free agency.
Grimes - Grimes play has obviously declined, and Miko has caused tension within the locker room.... Buuuuut, if we lose Grimes, we literally have no one at corner. That being said, we would have to acquire multiple corners in the offseason.
The most disturbing fact about cutting one or both of these question marks is that we would instantly create a major need for the draft/free agency. Obviously, we need to address the guard position, linebackers, corners, and a safety. Depending on how things go with Miller, we may need a running back. Cameron could get cut, and we may need another tight end. It would be wise to add tackle help as well.
Ultimately, we have limited cap space to add free agents. Realistically, we could hope to hit on three of our draft picks. That being said, if we let these guys go, we are going to wind up having holes elsewhere. Moreover, we could wind up simply exchanging one problem for another. -
-
dgfred likes this.
-
Imo, they should look to fixing the Oline, keeping Matthews and Miller so they can get a full on read on what/where Tanne is, deal with everything else via the draft and cheap FAs, the paramount thing for this organization right now is getting the best read on what they have at QB, and not trying to miracle our way into the playoffs this year.
If Shelby and Fede are the starting DEs next year, so be it, it could be worse, draft Hargreaves in the 1st and realize that sometimes you have to take a step backward before you can go forward, and I really hope Ross is starting to realize that now.
If they can get the offense going, tickets will fly of the shelves, regardless of how well the D is playing, O should be the focus in this tight offseason.Pandarilla, shamegame13, 2socks and 1 other person like this. -
*** Also: fire Tbaum and hire our Sean as Dolphin GM ;) . He is a menace in the GM leagues. -
As far as the 1st pick, I'm not stuck on Hargreaves, he just seems to be, at this point anyway, the best CB that will be available to us, and that is a primary need, if you think passrusher, I'm on board with that too. :up:dgfred likes this. -
-
Fin4Ever likes this.
-
I would bet you money Denver would take a chance on him for that pass rush - heck look what they did with Payton -
-
Fin4Ever likes this.
-
I said it then and I will say it now. I have nothing against SUH except we made a huge mistake at this time signing him. What his salary is going to do to this team for the next 3 -5 years boarders on criminal. If we were a SUH away from the show then yes - do it. But we ain't sniffing the super-bowl any time soon.
Hope I am wrong on the last sentence but I highly doubt it. -
Mr Wake we know we are supposed to pay you close to $10,000,000 this year but we only want to pay you $4,000,000 and then have you can try and earn the money back we are short changing you next year if you play well? Why would he ever agree to that anyway. He is due a new contract. Someone will pay him what he wants.
I just don't see how that bull**** wouldn't travel through the league.
Imagine if at your job your boss did that to you?
How would you feel about it?
I would be livid. I Agree to one thing - now they want to change it - not true to your word as an organization. I'd flip them the bird and be gone. Hell I'd double flip them and then go play for New Englandtirty8 likes this. -
-
I don't see Brent Grimes being worth 9.5 million dollars this season. Geez this kind of stuff is why we have cap problems. In 2013 he got 5.4m, 2014 4.0m. Tannenbaum shows up in 2015 and Grimes is at 10m for 2015, 9.5m for 2016 and 8.5m for 2017. Starting to see a trend here?? Cut him and get someone else in here for half the money.
If we continue with this organic grocery shopping we will end up being the New York jets from a few years ago.
Complete rebuild? - we are already there brother. There is only 24 players under contract for next year which means we will turn over more then half the teamPandarilla, Fin4Ever and Finster like this. -
2socks likes this.
-
-
I'm a big fan of both these guys, Wake is the reason why I joined a board, I joined my first site within a month of us signing Wake, he was the straw that broke the back on me joining an online site, I'm the OWF, original Wake fan, lol.
I was one of very few people that didn't view Wake as just another Canadian player, I thought at the time, which I was much ridiculed for, that it was like getting a free 1st or 2nd round pick, I thought he was that good after doing my research, and I was right, so Wake has a special place in my fan heart, and it's impossible not to admire him, he is the poster boy for giving your all, because when he wasn't he couldn't make a squad, but when he did he was an all pro player, it's like a fairy tale.
So suffice it to say Wake is actually in my pantheon of all time favorite players, but he's not going to be worth half his money either.
I'm all for bringing these guys back, but at reduced rates, and reduced expectations, I don't think either should be starting anymore.Fin4Ever likes this.
Page 1 of 2