Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'ThePHINS.com Team Survivor' started by Dolfan984, Apr 22, 2011.
That's one vote Hurricane
That's one vote each for Hurricane and lmeister
1 vote penn, hurricane, and lmeister
Two votes Hurricane, one vote for lmeister and penn
Two votes for Hurricane and lmeister3, one for penn
Three votes lmeister, 2 for Hurricane, and one for penn
Four votes lmeister, 2 Hurricane, and one penn. One more for lmeister and he's gone.
Eighth vote, and the third person voted out of ThePHINS Survivor 2
lmeister3, the tribe has spoken
I believe putting the wrong scores in the Arcade doomed you for the next challenge, which in losing made you an easy scape goat. You are the next person to face BIG E on Redemption Island, you do have chance to prove yourself and get yourself back in the game.
BIG E and lmeister3 are the next RI duel. The RI challenge should take less than 30 minutes. I will be contacting both of you to work out a time. Hopefully we can get it done by Sunday, but either way the challenge rules will be posted then. It's the draft challenge so it will not require much work at all.
Umm, didn't Hurricane beg to get voted off because he won't be around to play?
Damn, messed up that you voted out the one guy that didn't get knocked out in Battleship.
What a buncha diiiicks!
Not everyone voted for Lmeister3.
ULTRA MEGA LAWL!!!
Hurricane begged to be voted off because he wasn't going to be active. By voting off lmeister you basically just knocked 2 people off your team.
The way I look at it is just like in real survivor there's people who're worthless in challenges (might as well be inactive) but if they lose, it's the inactive person going, not them. Not having them sucks, but having a cushion that you won't have to eat your own if you lose is not always a bad thing.
Now the teams should be fair
Sorry meister, I swore I wouldn't vote for anyone who was forced to sit a challenge out and I didn't. Sucks dude
or hurricane can be the guy we sit out, considering we are still one up on your sorry *** team.
And who the f?@* voted for me? Asses
But why keep someone on your team who has already said he won't be participating anymore?
i voted for lmiester, to be honest. i like the guy, hes funny, but i got the feeling he wasnt taking it serious. if im wrong, thats ok, but thats how i felt.
There's so many good people this year. When someone's not giving 100% it sticks out like a sore thumb.
You have to have 2 up on us to sit someone out...l2p noob
trowa - 1
chris - 0
Right, but wouldn't you rather have someone not giving 100% than someone who isn't even around?
Also, that's another thing. I was wondering why meister sat out this challenge. Didn't make any sense.
from what i was told via skeet via text message was hurricane said he was missing this challenge MAYBE and that he would try his hardest to be there. So enless i was misinformed, thats why i didnt vote for hurricane
Cause he didnt do **** the challenge before?
So it was punishment?
Its early in the game, if you dont show up for a challenge, and you have to sit someone out (which i have stated over and over i dont agree with sitting someone out if you are dominating, but whatever) you sit out the person that has done the least for you.....no?
So is this point where I'm supposed to start kissing lmeister's *** like Skeet did PSG and E?
For the record, both skeet and I voted against the sitting people out rule.
If you're into kissing people's asses I suppose now is as good a time as any.
I'm more of a boob man myself.
I agree with you. It was more of a general statement.
10 v 8 battleship would be BS
You can work on trying to kiss your own ***. Might be a little more fulfilling for ya
And yet it wouldn't have made a difference. We still had 7 people alive at the end of the game. I don't think one more on their side would have made a difference.
My biggest beef with the rule was exactly what just happened. Someone would get sat against their wishes without a chance to redeem (or protect) themselves and then get voted off. only way it'll be worse is if the team forces someone to sit then purposely tanks a challenge so they can vote him/her out. But hey, it was voted on and hooray for majority. Let's hope people don't sink to the latter scenario
he voted for himself just fyi
I think we debated this a couple months ago. If a team wants to throw a challenge, one person won't be able to take on an entire team. Not with how these challenges are made up at end.
You would know about tanking challenges to vote someone off.