1. Miamian Senior Member

    6,312
    2,012
    0
    Dec 5, 2007
    Jerusalem, Israel
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1258705174694&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

     
    jason8er likes this.
  2. jason8er Luxury Box Luxury Box

    7,262
    7,149
    113
    Dec 7, 2007
    Beaufort, SC
  3. PressCoverage New Member

    because it's incredibly expensive....

    wind and solar are far better green technologies.
     
  4. Miamian Senior Member

    6,312
    2,012
    0
    Dec 5, 2007
    Jerusalem, Israel
    How so? This captures otherwise-wasted kinetic energy. It also has a zero carbon footprint so that funds that would be used for carbon mitigation would be saved.

    Also, it produces water more cheaply than standard methods.

    That equates to $40,000 per million cubic meters of water for active coastlines. In government budgetary terms that's a drop in the bucket. Hawai'i comes to mind.
     
  5. Topdawg13 New Member

    1,300
    305
    0
    Dec 1, 2009
    Indiana
    Sounds interesting, the sooner the world gets away from fossil-fuels, the better it will be for all of us.
     

Share This Page