Vontae Davis given up rec. on 10/11 tgts for 143 yards & 2 TDs.

27 replies

gladsadmadgladsadmadNew MemberOP
Sep 18, 2012, 06:54 PM
dolfan7171dolfan7171New Member
Sep 18, 2012, 06:57 PM

Wow...that's pretty bad to say the least.

Win, Lose, or Tie, I will be a Dolphins Fan Until I Die:up:

DisgustipateDisgustipatesubscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 07:01 PM

I'm all for the trade but I'm not sure it's fair to judge him on what he's done so far.

CrunchTimeCrunchTimeretired_admin
Sep 18, 2012, 07:04 PM

Even Grandma would not approve.He obviously has issues which this regime has detected and which they dont have the patience to overlook .I suspect its the same issues he has always had even when he was drafted.There were plenty of warning signals among the scouts.

TrowaTrowaNew Member
Sep 18, 2012, 07:09 PM

If were judging players on a 2 game sample size Drew Brees has thrown 4 picks and has a 71.6 passer rating. So he's clearly a bum.

jdang307jdang307subscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 07:15 PM

In a new system on a new team? Why not look to see what he did while here to judge him.

Mcduffie81Mcduffie81subscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 07:25 PM

Who gives a sh*t? We need to worry about Smith, Carroll and Clemons.

"There is nothing to fear, except everyone trying to tackle me." - Ted Ginn Jr.

MrCleanMrCleansubscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 07:44 PM

"Mcduffie81 wrote:

Who gives a sh*t? We need to worry about Smith, Carroll and Clemons.

Carroll's PFF coverage rating for the first two games combined is worse than Davis's rating. I will say though, I don't know how they arrived at that, because Carroll has a lower passer rating. There are other factors, I've just never heard what they are. I'd presume they are watching all 22 film of the games and looking at times when coverage is so close they QB doesn't even attempt a pass. That would not be reflected in passer rating into coverage of a given player.

“... I hope I never ridicule what is wise or good. Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies do divert me, I own, and I laugh at them whenever I can.”

― Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice

FinNastyFinNastymoderator
Sep 18, 2012, 08:19 PM

He got thrown into a new system with new players around him a week before the season. But clearly his first 2 weeks is a good barometer of how talented he is or not...

shourightshourightNew Member
Sep 18, 2012, 08:43 PM

"Disgustipate wrote:

I'm all for the trade but I'm not sure it's fair to judge him on what he's done so far.

What we can say is that his play so far is inconsistent with the belief that he was developing into being a better player, and consistent with the Dolphins' coaches' belief that he was not starter material and should be traded for the right price.

He's done nothing so far to suggest the former is true, and the latter is untrue. Whether that continues to be the case remains to be seen, but right now we can indeed say this.

BuckeyeKingBuckeyeKingNew Member
Sep 18, 2012, 09:03 PM

I think its unfair to judge him at this point in the season. He was traded before the final week of preseason? Not a whole lot of time to get acclimated with your new team.

MuckMuckretired_admin
Sep 18, 2012, 09:10 PM

"Mcduffie81 wrote:

Who gives a sh*t? We need to worry about Smith, Carroll and Clemons.

It's perfectly fine to discuss former players. Especially ones we just traded for a second round pick. Not like Jeff Ireland isn't being judged on it.

Your username is Mcduffie81, after a guy whose been gone a decade. ;)

Make the throwback uniforms permanent!

Mcduffie81Mcduffie81subscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 09:43 PM

"Muck wrote:

It's perfectly fine to discuss former players. Especially ones we just traded for a second round pick. Not like Jeff Ireland isn't being judged on it.

Your username is Mcduffie81, after a guy whose been gone a decade. ;)

I never said anything about that.

It's just that the reason this topic is being discussed.....again....is not only inflamatory, but extremely premature.

"There is nothing to fear, except everyone trying to tackle me." - Ted Ginn Jr.

smahtazsmahtazforum_veteran
Sep 18, 2012, 09:55 PM

"shouright wrote:

What we can say is that his play so far is inconsistent with the belief that he was developing into being a better player, and consistent with the Dolphins' coaches' belief that he was not starter material and should be traded for the right price.

He's done nothing so far to suggest the former is true, and the latter is untrue. Whether that continues to be the case remains to be seen, but right now we can indeed say this.

I have to question anyone that thinks this secondary is better today than it would be with Davis on board. What if Marshall is really hurt and misses time?



It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. ~ John Wooden

MrCleanMrCleansubscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 10:22 PM

"smahtaz wrote:

I have to question anyone that thinks this secondary is better today than it would be with Davis on board. What if Marshall is really hurt and misses time?

Oh, not to worry young man. Some of the fine fair folks here apparently believe RJ Stanford is about equal in ability to Davis. Or so I recall one of the Ireland defense team posting in the past week or so.

“... I hope I never ridicule what is wise or good. Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies do divert me, I own, and I laugh at them whenever I can.”

― Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice

shourightshourightNew Member
Sep 18, 2012, 11:36 PM

"smahtaz wrote:

I have to question anyone that thinks this secondary is better today than it would be with Davis on board. What if Marshall is really hurt and misses time?

Do you think Davis would be playing better for us than he is for the Colts?

Mcduffie81Mcduffie81subscriber
Sep 18, 2012, 11:43 PM

"shouright wrote:

Do you think Davis would be playing better for us than he is for the Colts?

It's an enormous possibility! What do you think given the circumstances?

"There is nothing to fear, except everyone trying to tackle me." - Ted Ginn Jr.

BuckeyeKingBuckeyeKingNew Member
Sep 19, 2012, 12:19 AM

"shouright wrote:

Do you think Davis would be playing better for us than he is for the Colts?

Yes. We are hurt at depth at corner. Even as a nickle corner he is better than Carrol.

But hey we got a high pick for him and he may never actually "get it" but for the now it hurts.

WhiteIbanezWhiteIbanezNew Member
Sep 19, 2012, 12:31 AM

"BuckeyeKing wrote:

Yes. We are hurt at depth at corner. Even as a nickle corner he is better than Carrol.

But hey we got a high pick for him and he may never actually "get it" but for the now it hurts.

We aren't missing Davis at this point man.

BuckeyeKingBuckeyeKingNew Member
Sep 19, 2012, 12:47 AM

"WhiteIbanez wrote:

We aren't missing Davis at this point man.

Will you be saying once we play some actual teams that can throw the ball?

djphinfandjphinfansubscriber
Sep 19, 2012, 12:58 AM

"MrClean wrote:

Oh, not to worry young man. Some of the fine fair folks here apparently believe RJ Stanford is about equal in ability to Davis. Or so I recall one of the Ireland defense team posting in the past week or so.

Lol..

So much for jimmy playin safety..?

Is Marshall playin this week.?

shourightshourightNew Member
Sep 19, 2012, 07:05 AM

On a rebuilding team, I'd sure rather have a 2nd-round pick than a player who's playing the way Vontae Davis is right now.

Imagine it like this: we trade our 2nd-round pick for a corner on another team who's third on its depth chart, and he comes in here and plays the way Davis is.

Do you honestly think you'd be feeling good about that move?

xphinfanxxphinfanxforum_veteran
Sep 19, 2012, 11:58 AM

I don't buy the new system would Ed Reed or Darrel Revis need to acclimate into a new system DB CB FS ? After all it's his profession and whats different man to man or zone? It is a new group of men around him but he is suppose to be a pro at it. I say his mind isn't in it like it should be.

That's why they play the games!:yes:

KB21KB21subscriber
Sep 19, 2012, 12:03 PM

"shouright wrote:

On a rebuilding team, I'd sure rather have a 2nd-round pick than a player who's playing the way Vontae Davis is right now.

Imagine it like this: we trade our 2nd-round pick for a corner on another team who's third on its depth chart, and he comes in here and plays the way Davis is.

Do you honestly think you'd be feeling good about that move?

While that is true, the thing that sticks in my mind was the improvement the Dolphins made relative to their pass efficiency defense last year over the final half of the season. During the first half, Miami was 30th in the NFL in pass efficiency defense and DVOA. Over the 2nd half, Miami was 3rd in the NFL. The biggest difference between the two halves is that Vontae missed 4 games and part of another game in the first half and played in every game over the second half.

The ability and the impact is there. The question is tapping it and getting it to come out on a consistent basis.

So far, a difference has been made. The Dolphins without Vontae are 26th in the NFL in Pass defense DVOA this year. Now, with the way he is playing, they probably would not have been better with him this year. However, our ability to defend the pass is in serious question. I think it is mostly on the safeties, but we definitely need someone that can give us what Vontae gave us on a inconsistent basis and do it consistently without the professionalism issues.

emocomputerjockemocomputerjockNew Member
Sep 19, 2012, 12:03 PM

"shouright wrote:

On a rebuilding team, I'd sure rather have a 2nd-round pick than a player who's playing the way Vontae Davis is right now.

Imagine it like this: we trade our 2nd-round pick for a corner on another team who's third on its depth chart, and he comes in here and plays the way Davis is.

Do you honestly think you'd be feeling good about that move?

There'd be at least 20 people saying it was a good move.


Many thanks to the awesome staff and members of the site, all of whom contribute tirelessly to an incredible Dolphins fansite.

Log in to reply.