Reggie Bush is not a workhorse back who can carry a heavy load with.
Although he does bring a new dimension greatly needed, and I'm glad we have him...
Enter Daniel Thomas aspiring protege but as of yet no NFL experience.... and depending on him as our only featured RB is possibly a major gamble. (Hasn't played a down yet in the NFL)
We still need a workhorse RB such as Ronnie, Ricky, possibly M. Barber who I think just was released.
I just hope we are not depending on Hilliard or other backups to fill that need. Especially considering the fact of our coaches preferences to build around a strong running game.
-
-
I have to disagree. My concern with DT was that he'll be a grind it out workhorse back with no flash or big play in him. (IE: a younger ronnie) But now we went out and traded for a RB whose whole arsenal is nothing BUT flash and big play ability. Bush can't go between the tackles or move the ball on steadily up the middle, but he can be screen, toss, counter, recieving threat that defenses will hate having to deal with.
I say you stick with the rook and go for a cheap backup. Bush and DT are a great mix IMO. -
I do not agree. The 3rd RB should play special teams.
-
Hilliard is somewhat of a utility player. He plays special teams and IMO is not a terrible back. I am just glad Cobbs wont be our scat back...
-
-
So DT for some reason doesn't seem to be on the NFL level in his early stages or god forbid gets a little banged up what do we do ?
Bush is not capable of carrying that kind of load and a average backup or good special teams player may not be sufficient to keep the running aspect a real threat.
Especially since the ground game is going to be our supposed strength.......It's to much of a gamble to ignore IMO -
Huge assumption IMO at this stage of his career. -
-
I could see us resigning Ronnie for sure now.
-
-
Good point. I think Bush will relieve Bess of his PR duties and he and Gates give us a couple alternatives to Carrol as a KR.
The biggest thing that Bush brings IMO is the 3rd down back/matchup nightmare role. With Marshall, Bess & Bush all on the field it's going to be difficult for defenses to focus on any one of them. All of them can defeat single coverage w/ relative ease and they can all make people miss after the catch. Bush can also help revive the screen game and serve as a check down threat that defenses actually have to account for. We can put him in the slot or line him up outside and move Marshall into the a lot to create matchups. He adds a ton of versatility and allows us to attack defenses in ways we couldn't dream of last year and I haven't even mentioned Gates or Clay. Last year I (and others) complained all season about our lack of speed & play making on offense and clearly Jeff Ireland has moved aggressively to change that. Kudos to him. -
And you have faith that DT is all we hope he is, which I don't see how thats possible to know at this stage
If we knew DT's true ability and not going on pure assumption with absolutely No NFL proof of his success to make judgement on, I'd be more in line with your view. But because of our heavy dependence and critical need of a solid ground game feel and hope our Guys running the show bring in someone with more proven success than Hilliard who I consider more a descent fill in for a breather once and a while and not as a successful RB able to carry a significant load.........JMOMrClean likes this. -
I think they could/should sign Ricky. A team like Miami without a Top 10 QB should aim to have a Top 5 Rushing Attack. Ricky would be a big help, I think Ronnie is going to want a longer deal and more $$ which he should. They'll probably go for Barber though, since they love Dallas players.
Thomas could be great, but he's also an unproven rookie and Bush can't carry 25 times a game. If Thomas struggles or Bush gets hurt, we could be screwed.
Would feel so much better with Ricky, Ronnie or Barber. Prefer Ricky. -
I really disagree that our 3rd RB has to play special teams. We are a run-oriented offense. Our top priority is to make sure that we have 3 good RBs that can step in and carry the load. We already know that Bush can't carry the load, so our priority is to make sure our 3rd RB can. We can fill the special teams hole elsewhere.
-
-
-
I absolutely 100% agree with Abbi Normal. Every running attack in today's NFL should feature two guys shouldering the load. Reggie Bush is not fit to be one of those two because he's no good at running the ball, only good for catching it. That puts enormous pressure on a ROOKIE the NFL was perfectly willing to let slip into the 3rd round, Daniel Thomas.
This is not wise. The Dolphins should have another presence aside from those two who could be a ball carrier along with Daniel Thomas, while Reggie Bush serves his role as the most expensive 3rd down back in the NFL.atomdomb and schmolioot like this. -
I could care less if our 3rd RB plays special teams. I do care that he makes our team better, and that does require a Ronnie, Ricky, Barber, or the like.
Our team is going to run the ball 450-500 times this year. If we're lucky, Bush will account for about 100 of those carries. Anyone want to count on Thomas to carry the ball 350+ times? Ain't gonna happen.
In the past we had R&R, Cobbs and Hilliard, in addition to Polite, who is at risk this year. Our 3rd RB will likely get 150 carries this season. How much sense does it make to require he also play special teams, when he is going to be a big part of our O? None whatsoever. -
-
We don't just need "a" running back. We need one that can conceivably be relied upon for well over 100 carries and possibly a lot more if Bush has his usual date with the injury list. If you want your 3rd RB to be a special teamer, you should have thought twice about trading for a pure 3rd down back with major durability concerns.
-
I think I'd take Ronnie -
Is Mike Tolbert an unrestricted free agent or not? If he is then I think he'd be a great fit. Pure yard gaining pounder, physical presence, capable of breaking tackles and having a high average, and he's not yet worn down like Marion Barber is.
If not him, I'd look up Ronnie Brown. At some point he definitely becomes attractive again even if that does marry two injury prone guys with a rookie, as Vendigo says. -
vt_dolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member
Im not really concerned about Ronnie's injury history.....not with DT as the main RB. With Ronnie being the character player he is....I would love to see them sign him...and he play the FB position quite a bit. The way he catches out of the backfield...I think having Ronnie and Reggie in the backfield together could be amazing.
-
-
Sproles caught 45 passes for 527 yards, 11 yard avg, and 4 TDs. Bush caught 57 for 430 yds, a 7.5 avg, and 4 TDs.
Sproles ran 96 times for 376 yds, a 3.9 avg, and 3 TDs. Bush ran 87 times for 513 yds, a 5.9 avg, and 6 TDs.
I use 2009 because Bush played 12 games, and I believe his stats are roughly what can be expected this year. He is a great receiving option at RB but, he can also run, although not as often as we would like.MrClean likes this. -
-
The kid in Detroit that wanted to come here? Yeah, him.
-
-
Tony Sparano wants to run the football and I cannot believe that I herd on NFL Network that Bush has been told he will be the feature back here. If Jeff Ireland is thinking this way, he better sign two more Rb's. Ronnie Brown and one other because Bush will not last 5-6 games.
I do know featuring Bush does not have to mean running him up the middle but he is more of a threat out of the backfield. Getting him past the LOS is where he does his damage...