What nfc team can beat the Jets in Superbowl

"Killerphins wrote:

Not even Chuck Norris can beat the Jets.
They are the champs....... :up:

Blasphemy!!!

"lmeister3 wrote:

Worst thread ever.

Sent from my Laptop

Best post of this thread ever.

Sent from my laptop while sitting on the toilet.

(I emptied out the water, let it dry, and painted a Jets symbol inside it.... and now I am pooping on the Jets. I also bought some Jets TP........ no explanation needed)

:chuckle:

browns...

Toddphins already took the browns to the superbowl!

"first&goal wrote:

At time I wonder why I hate the Jets.....and the conclusion is always the same, the fans is why.....and now they are thinking that Jets are going to the superbowl. What a joke!!!!

I'm pretty sure one of your idiot fans started this thread.

"gamblerx wrote:

browns...

I don't get it.

Yeah the NFC sucks. The biggest obstacle right now for the Jets will be the Ravens and Steelers.

Of all the NFC teams I see the Giants, Falcons and Cowboys matching up best with the Jets. The Giants because they have so many ways to beat a team and can play either smashmouth or a finesse game. Theyre also allowing only 246 ypg (#1) and lead the league in pass defense. Aside from the Indianapolis debacle theyve shown a good pass rush. The cowboys are a very similar team but if they fall to 1-4 theyre going to need a miracle just to make the playoffs. The Falcons have such a great running game...they remind me of the 2008 phins but with one of the games elite wr's, Roddy White.

But I also dont think the Jets will get past the Ravens Steelers or Colts o get to the super bowl.

"Boik14 wrote:

Of all the NFC teams I see the Giants, Falcons and Cowboys matching up best with the Jets. The Giants because they have so many ways to beat a team and can play either smashmouth or a finesse game. Theyre also allowing only 246 ypg (#1) and lead the league in pass defense. Aside from the Indianapolis debacle theyve shown a good pass rush. The cowboys are a very similar team but if they fall to 1-4 theyre going to need a miracle just to make the playoffs. The Falcons have such a great running game...they remind me of the 2008 phins but with one of the games elite wr's, Roddy White.

But I also dont think the Jets will get past the Ravens Steelers or Colts o get to the super bowl.

Fair assessment, but here is the test. Do you see the Dolphins getting past the Ravens, Steelers or Colts?

"BicketyBam wrote:

Fair assessment, but here is the test. Do you see the Dolphins getting past the Ravens, Steelers or Colts?

I don't know about the Ravens or Steelers but we can always beat the Colts if they bench their starters :up:

"Phinatic425 wrote:

I don't know about the Ravens or Steelers but we can always beat the Colts if they bench their starters :up:

I don't think the Colts would bench their starters in the playoffs.

"BicketyBam wrote:

I don't think the Colts would bench their starters in the playoffs.

Too bad for the Jets :lol:

"BicketyBam wrote:

Fair assessment, but here is the test. Do you see the Dolphins getting past the Ravens, Steelers or Colts?

Yes if we play mistake free and they play like we have the past 2 games. If we're playing at our best I think we can give any team a run for their money tbh.

"jpep13 wrote:

nfc is kind of week.

*Weak

"Darrelle Revis wrote:

The Saints are the only team that can compete with us.

So what's the 1 in your 4-1 record then? Being so sexy and so good? Puh-lease the Jets aren't invincible in any way.

"first&goal wrote:

At time I wonder why I hate the Jets.....and the conclusion is always the same, the fans is why.....and now they are thinking that Jets are going to the superbowl. What a joke!!!!

Why wouldn't they though? Best record in the conference right? Should they expect to lose 10 in a row or some ****?

"ToddsPhins wrote:

Yes if we play mistake free and they play like we have the past 2 games. If we're playing at our best I think we can give any team a run for their money tbh.

So can you say the same thing for the Jets then?

Do you see what I am getting at here? The statement was made that the poster couldn't see the Jets getting past the Ravens, Colts or Steelers to make it to the Super Bowl. I think that's a fair opinion. But if you don't think the Jets can make it past those teams in the playoffs, then how in the hell could you think Miami can? And "Because I am a Miami fan" or "Because I have a gut feeling" doesn't count :lol:

I can not see how you can make an argument that Miami would have a better chance at advancing past those teams than the Jets. But I am all ears.

"AbideN703 wrote:

Why wouldn't they though? Best record in the conference right? Should they expect to lose 10 in a row or some ****?

4-1 is nice, but it really doesn't mean d!ck at this point in the season. You can be a bad 4-1 and a good 2-2. You have to look at the team and how they have won and lost to determine whether they are championship material. And as I have stated in other posts, the Jets have too many holes right now...even with their 4-1 record.

"AbideN703 wrote:

So what's the 1 in your 4-1 record then? Being so sexy and so good? Puh-lease the Jets aren't invincible in any way.

...go spurs?

"unluckyluciano wrote:

Best.Thread.Evar.

Sent from DePhinistr8's bedroom.

"BicketyBam wrote:

So can you say the same thing for the Jets then?

Do you see what I am getting at here? The statement was made that the poster couldn't see the Jets getting past the Ravens, Colts or Steelers to make it to the Super Bowl. I think that's a fair opinion. But if you don't think the Jets can make it past those teams in the playoffs, then how in the hell could you think Miami can? And "Because I am a Miami fan" or "Because I have a gut feeling" doesn't count :lol:

I can not see how you can make an argument that Miami would have a better chance at advancing past those teams than the Jets. But I am all ears.

I honestly thought the Jets would implode this season due to all of the premature credit they were receiving for the Superbowl. But to my dismay they have been playing extremely well. I guess all I can do now is hold on to the hope that they will start to decline later in the season :pointlol:

"BicketyBam wrote:

So can you say the same thing for the Jets then?

Do you see what I am getting at here? The statement was made that the poster couldn't see the Jets getting past the Ravens, Colts or Steelers to make it to the Super Bowl. I think that's a fair opinion. But if you don't think the Jets can make it past those teams in the playoffs, then how in the hell could you think Miami can? And "Because I am a Miami fan" or "Because I have a gut feeling" doesn't count :lol:

I can not see how you can make an argument that Miami would have a better chance at advancing past those teams than the Jets. But I am all ears.

I'm not one who's saying Miami stands a better chance against Balt, Indy, or Pitt, but I do feel that if we're playing at the top of our game at the end of the season, then it's possible. However if those 3 are playing at the top of their game then I think the odds are stacked against us. We're just so young of a team.

The only reason I personally put Balt, Indy, and Pitt ahead of NY is b/c I feel that it's almost inevitable that Sanchez will hit a little skid at some point during this season as most extremely young QBs do (and that's not a knock on Mark by any means). However, if you guys are at the top of your game, I think you can compete with anyone. You played Balt close enough that I think playing them again could go either way. Will having Ed Reed back and Flacco with 16 games to gel with Housh & Boldin make a difference? IMO Pitt has a "big-game" experience advantage and I think they have a slight edge if you (or us) are playing them on their turf in the playoffs. Plus their defense (and LBs) might be too complex for Mark to handle at this stage. If Indy is hot at the end of the year, then it's difficult to not give Manning and their experience the edge. Just my thoughts.

"ToddsPhins wrote:

I'm not one who's saying Miami stands a better chance against Balt, Indy, or Pitt, but I do feel that if we're playing at the top of our game at the end of the season, then it's possible. However if those 3 are playing at the top of their game then I think the odds are stacked against us. We're just so young of a team.

The only reason I personally put Balt, Indy, and Pitt ahead of NY is b/c I feel that it's almost inevitable that Sanchez will hit a little skid at some point during this season as most extremely young QBs do (and that's not a knock on Mark by any means). However, if you guys are at the top of your game, I think you can compete with anyone. You played Balt close enough that I think playing them again could go either way. Will having Ed Reed back and Flacco with 16 games to gel with Housh & Boldin make a difference? IMO Pitt has a "big-game" experience advantage and I think they have a slight edge if you (or us) are playing them on their turf in the playoffs. Plus their defense (and LBs) might be too complex for Mark to handle at this stage. If Indy is hot at the end of the year, then it's difficult to not give Manning and their experience the edge. Just my thoughts.

Hard to argue with any of that. Good post.

"BicketyBam wrote:

4-1 is nice, but it really doesn't mean d!ck at this point in the season. You can be a bad 4-1 and a good 2-2. You have to look at the team and how they have won and lost to determine whether they are championship material. And as I have stated in other posts, the Jets have too many holes right now...even with their 4-1 record.

Exactly. We were a slightly above average team in 08 who had the lucky advantage of playing a schedule full of extremely crappy defenses. Result: a deceptive 11-5 record........ b/c we were in no way shape or form an 11-5 team.

I don't think you have any more holes or question marks than we do...... at least not this year. LOL

"lmeister3 wrote:

Why stop at NFL teams?

Bowling Green
Cal Poly-technical
FIU
Louisiana-Lafayette
University of Phoenix
Everest

U of Phoenix has a team? must be hard practicing online... :shifty: