http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/46935/352/what-went-wrong-lamar-miller
I have mixed feelings, maybe this article holds a little water. Either way if we are going to blame an OL and OC (justifiably) then we can't stop at excusing just Tannehill.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Pretty good article, and accurate, I think. The problems in the run game weren't one thing. It was a combination of the bad OL, bad coaching, bad playcalling, the fact that the defense didn't respect the passing game the way other teams do, and on Miller as well for not always hitting the right hole. The good news is that most of those things should be better this season. How much better is the important question, but we don't even have all the answers yet, as two OL positions are still open.
-
Its amazing we were 8-8 considering our QB was so bad that Wallace's problems are Tanny's fault, the running game sucking is his fault, the sacks were his fault, bad playcalling was his fault, the defense not being able to stop the run was probably his fault too. Hell, I hear he forced Cogs to molest that woman at the event and pick on Martin. Some studies have shown that gout, the clap, eczema are also linked to Tannehill.
MAFishFan, Puka-head, Colorado Dolfan and 5 others like this. -
Colorado Dolfan, Larry Little, TopLoader and 6 others like this.
-
-
Moreno will take his snaps away this year, I'd like to see him produce in his role, run with more violence in his nature, not have an anxiety attack when he does get in the open field, be able to handle big moments, not drop the football when it's perfectly placed.
I think this year with his speed on the outside and us running more zone and stretch plays his role will be truly that of a change of pace back..the difference of speed between the two should take the defense by suprise some.MikeHoncho and Unlucky 13 like this. -
-
I think the author hit the nail on the head, poor execution on the OL's part and poor playcalling on the OC's part, that pretty much sums it up. Miller does frustrate me sometimes but I still think he has some potential.
ps: how did Tannehill even get into this conversation, the article didn't mention him ONCE.
EDIT- Actually it did mention him exactly once, in this sentence: "Miller botched his first snap of the preseason for a Ryan Tannehill fumble, and averaged a modest 4.23 yards on 17 carries thereafter."Unlucky 13, jdang307, DPlus47 and 1 other person like this. -
Nothing went wrong. He was a fourth round running back. The odds of him succeeding were slim to begin with.
If anything, this is an instructive lesson on what to expect from the draft.
Here are a list of all the RBs drafted in the 4th round or later since 2009. There really isn't much to hang your hat on in terms successes. -
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
Seriously, I think all of us saw that as the season unfolded. The OL issues, as has been the history of this franchise since Shula left, just never materialized. That in itself is reason for some optimism this coming season, however, some of the problem has to be laid on Miller. He was not much better than Thomas last season and that's a testament of HIS prowess, not a result of the OL or playcalling or other issues we had... -
-
GMJohnson likes this.
-
I think the issues are along the lines of what the article mentioned, but are more specific. Lamar Miller is an outside runner on a team that couldn't run effectively block them, and didn't really make good adjustments to do it better.
Miller might be more of a change of pace back than what everyone hoped for, but he's got some genuine ability when he hits the edge and the team should do a better job having linemen who can block outside zone, or breaking down and pulling linemen outside if need be.CWBIII, DPlus47, GMJohnson and 1 other person like this. -
I personally don't think the staff is ready to admit this yet. I believe Miller will get more carries than Moreno because the staff feels like Miller was robbed by the OLine of his real 'opportunity' to seize a feature role. Moreno is insurance while they check out if Miller can be the guy. He has this one last chance to prove himself. I know I'm in the minority here, but I do think signing Moreno was actually a vote of confidence in Miller.
I was against the Moreno signing because it likely prohibits us from taking a stud back in the top 3 rounds, and the link you posted says a lot about why I want to draft a guy high. Tannehill needs a workhorse as he develops. Just about every legit franchise QB in the game right now had a stud RB in the backfield during his first few years. Even Peyton Manning was helped along by Marshall Faulk and Edge. It's an invaluable piece to developing a young QB.DPlus47 likes this. -
GMJohnson likes this.
-
-
The fan base had expectations of Miller being a dynamic back but in reality he is merely mediocre.
That is what happened to Miller.
People blame the Oline exclusively but Miller has to make things happen and he just can't.
I tried to tell everyone but people got pissed and said I was wrong.
Miller has poor vision and is a one trick pony. -
blame:
40% offensive line
60% coaching
it's hard for me to even give miller any blame. -
Do you know at this point, Lamar miller is still 22 years old. -
Please explain why Tanny was brought up in THIS piece??? -
-
-
The one run that sticks out for me with Miller was against the Bengals. 2nd Qtr..10mins on the clock. He had a home run if he cut left with an open field infront of him. He didn't when it was glaring. That cut back was obvious if Miller had that instinct. He didnt. Hmmmm.
77FinFan likes this. -
-
-
I don't think Miller's pass protection was particularly bad last season, either. He's not Clinton Portis, but the coaching staff let opposing defenses T-off on the backs in pass protection. I don't think any teams relied on their backs more often than Miami, and they basically telegraphed what they were going to do. There was too many times they both just got crushed by players they shouldn't have had to block over and over. -
When you run a stretch play, where your OT's are supposed to block a Cb and they had -0- chance of getting it done, Miller's Hr potential was limited.
Add in, we passed the ball predominately w/the Rb staying in to block, and even then the OL could not execute simple draw plays, and yeah, I'm not down on Lamar Miller at all.
bad coaching, bad scheme fits, meets poor athleticism, and zone blocking is not going to work very well, yet instead of going more hat on hat blocking, Sherman stuck with ZBScdz12250 likes this. -
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk -
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk -
Fin D likes this.
-
-
Point was, there was no need to bring Tanny into the discussion on Miller to begin with.Fin D likes this. -
There's a clan? Why am I always the last to know these things? :shifty:
Puka-head and cuchulainn like this. -
I simply stated if you blame X and Y for the issues RT has, then you have to apply that logic to the other offensive players as well. Then the masses came uh runnin. -
-
What masses? You're referring to a few comments due to you negatively mentioning Tannehill with the "excuses" swipe.
If you don't want to get growled at, then let sleeping dogs lie...Fin D likes this. -
Yea, what I said merited a meltdown from Fin D, and his crew.....anyone can see that.
But I'm glad it did, laughing at the over zealous RT nut huggers never gets old.
Page 1 of 2