You know its his job to work directly with Henne. Maybe his teaching skills are lacking ? Just because of the wildcat he shouldn't be blameless.
-
-
Good point.
His claim to fame had been developing Romo (who took til year four to catch on, and has been a rollercoaster ever since).
NOt sure David Lee's resume is beyond reproch. I DO see Henne progressing though. He just does it SLOWLY, and backslides/regresses in one area while progressing in another.
Overall, Henne is progressing If we had the patience, Henne could be great after two more years starting. lol.SeanP, MikeHoncho and DolfanJake like this. -
Miguel likes this.
-
2 mor e years of LOSING¿????? no thanks -
finfansince72 Season Ticket Holder Club Member
Henne has shown improvement so I don't know why anyone would be blaming David Lee, its not his fault the coaching staff thinks Henne is to blame for the season. I mean we are one blown call (steelers) and couple of games the special teams handed teams 10+ points away from being one of the top teams in the league but lets bench the Qb and fire the Qb coach by all means.
Phinz420 and NJFINSFAN1 like this. -
Boik14, dolfan7171 and Rocky Raccoon like this.
-
If Qb play alone was the reason for our woes than he would be taken to task. Since a QB change is a last ditch effort to save an OCs job then no way.
GMJohnson likes this. -
david lee has a reputation as being an excellent fundamentals coach. pennington in 2008 had his best or near best season under him and i think in addition to romo, two other qbs had good seasons under him
-
-
-
vt_dolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member
At this point....I see Henne's sure fire improvements in his touch....his going through his progressions....
I see the mental damn in Henne's head being a combination of Dan Hennings play calling, an offense that is not suited for his strengths.....
And one thing that really....REALLY worries me...and has me worried that Chad Pennington isnt going to change anything....
A 16th ranked running game. -
I was going to start a thread like this. Good question that needs to be asked. If he is in charge of developing the QB and the QB isn't developing as fast or in the manner you'd like, then you should examine Lee's abilities.
That being said, was Henne playing 'THAT' badly? I see Lee coached Tavaris Jackson, and I'm sorry for all of those who dislike Henne, but he's a damn sight better than Jackson in terms of bad play.
I can understand why the change was made, although I cannot agree with it.GMJohnson, DolfanJake, SeanP and 1 other person like this. -
-
adamprez2003 likes this.
-
Also, I can't say this enough I've seen on more than one occasion Henning call plays that have '0' receivers in the endzone when we are in fact in the redzone. That also hurts your chances as well. I mean no receivers in the endzone when we're inside the 20? Not one to even threaten the back line and force a defender to cover that part of the field?Rocky Raccoon likes this. -
GMJohnson likes this.
-
-
lee didn't do flip with pat white but i can't say that goes all on lee as that was probly the wierdest handling of things i've ever seen from a fo.nor has thiggy really progressed and if they decided that henne is not getting it then thats 0 and 3 for david lee here and while 100% of our mediocracy isn't on him,as a hc right now i'm looking at "everyone" from the staff to the players for improvement which this is a place that needs to improve.
DolfanJake likes this. -
-
the only thing i'll say in this is that i'd have to believe it was his charter to develop Henne as a Parcell's QB .... something i don't see Henne being .....
Henne is just not made for this FO and OC - plain and simple .... and if i were him, i'd find a quick ride out of MIA .... he will be a very successful NFL QB - just not here.
i also understand the QB switch -- not happy at all about it ... and don't think we have a chance at all at winning a SB this year, so to me it is all pointless.