1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why isn’t the NFPLA investigating the players!?

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by whiskeyCoke72, Oct 1, 2022.

  1. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    I’ve played competitive soccer for 40 years and I am a USMC Reconnaissance Marine …I know , in the moment on both of those plays, the defenders made a consensus decision to inflict injury!
    Why isn’t the NFLPA investigating why those players tried to mame a fellow player?
     
  2. Rick 1966

    Rick 1966 Professional Hipshooter

    8,577
    3,826
    113
    Nov 23, 2007
    Powell, WY
    *maim
     
  3. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    Yeah, Marines don’t spell well
    But both of the plays - the defender was trying to inflict an injury - so where’s the NFLPA investigation?
     
  4. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    This isn’t coached?
     
  5. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009


    At the 7 second mark, that’s intentional! - I’m gonna whip saw kill this mf!
    Player safety my ***!!
     

  6. honestly, your uneventful soccer and marine career are irrelevant. Football, and it is clear you never played, is about inflicting injury. Lessers can try and legislate that, and gripe about it all they want....but that is the game. It always has been, and always will be until the game resembles something so far astray it wont matter. Both hits on Tua were things that happen 1000 times on friday nights across high school games. Those protesting just never felt the fire, which is fine.
     
    Sceeto and StaleTacos like this.
  7. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    You know when you’re trying to hurt some one, they weren’t trying stop a third down, they were trying to hurt someone
     
  8. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
  9. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    If that’s what you’re teaching your kids, tell ‘em to come to my house
     
  10. canesz06

    canesz06 Well-Known Member

    1,648
    754
    113
    Mar 13, 2012
    You're having a full on conversation with yourself. Outstanding
     
    Dolphin Dundee and StaleTacos like this.
  11. The_Dark_Knight

    The_Dark_Knight Defender of the Truth

    11,845
    10,352
    113
    Nov 24, 2007
    Rockledge, FL
    Football is NOT about inflicting injury. The headhunting days of the 70’s are over.

    And unless you actually WATCHED football during the 70’s, don’t even start with a “yea, but”
     
  12. brandon27

    brandon27 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    45,652
    19,304
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Windsor, ON. CANADA
    I've never read something more wrong in my life than this. Maybe 40 years ago, maybe there's still a handful of players out there with that mentality. The intent though was never to inflict injury, even back then. Was it to be tough and intimidate and create fear and pain, sure; I'm with you there. But to go out and inflict injury? That's just ridiculous.
     
    Mexphin likes this.
  13. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    Exactly,
    sports = play to win, within the rules and mutual respect
    Combat = inflict pain and death, there are no rules
    I’ve done both
    On both Cincinnati plays above they crossed the line, they were trying to inflict injury and didn’t care about the rules- that should be investigated!
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2022
  14. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    I mean if it’s gonna be uneventful- shoot me a time and place, I’ll show you the difference
     
    KeyFin likes this.
  15. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    The kids legs are spread (he has leverage) and he has full control of Tuas hips with his hand position and leverage.. and then decides to whiplash/ suplex Tiua rather than roll him up? That’s a conscious, im gonna use this leverage and position to whiplash Tua! Everybody who’s played and watches the tape knows that’s what’s going through his head ….
     
    Mexphin likes this.
  16. whiskeyCoke72

    whiskeyCoke72 Active Member

    525
    110
    43
    Sep 22, 2009
    Christian got fined b/c he maybe fondled Josh allen in a pile up!? # 98 tried to put Tuas head through the turf!?
    Yeah I’m conversing with my self again ❤️
     
  17. hitman8

    hitman8 Well-Known Member

    3,050
    2,509
    113
    Nov 11, 2016
    That's a natural way of making that tackle around the back, you have to use your leverage. Maybe he put a little more torque on it than he should have, and due to the size difference between him and Tua the whiplash effect was more dramatic, but there was nothing majorly out of the ordinary for that type of tackle. I tackled guys in that same way hundreds of times when I played football.
     
    Sceeto likes this.
  18. OwesOwn614

    OwesOwn614 Well-Known Member

    3,796
    3,823
    113
    Jul 8, 2020
     
    The_Dark_Knight likes this.
  19. Fishhead

    Fishhead Well-Known Member

    2,078
    1,737
    113
    Sep 29, 2016
    Hypocrites AND idiots - a bad combination, but that’s what passes for “expert analysis “ on ESPN these days.
     
  20. OwesOwn614

    OwesOwn614 Well-Known Member

    3,796
    3,823
    113
    Jul 8, 2020
    At this point, it's like the mob chasing Frankenstein. You know most of them have no idea where they're going or why they holding pitchforks and torches, but since the crowd's moving that way, they're going along with it. Now, the NFLPA is saying that Tua shouldn't have been permitted back in the game or allowed to play on Thursday because of his back, regardless of speculative neurological trauma. They're saying this because they can't answer the question of when somebody should be cleared to play again. What's stupid (and not being discussed) is even if Tua was deactivated to return on Sunday, he still would have suffered the same result on Thursday. I suppose every player who gets pulled from a game for medical reasons should be put on short-term IR.

    I still believe they're trying to reopen the CTE settlement, which most people believe they settled for far less than they should have gotten.
     
    Fishhead likes this.

Share This Page