1. DevilFin13 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    10,059
    7,128
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    I always find it interesting to look at this and put some numbers on what happened Sunday. I don't know how to get the graph pasted here. So if you're lazy and don't want to follow the link I'll note some key plays and performances. (Note: These numbers aren't the whole story. But I think they're a good starting point for further discussion)

    We were at .95 wp (out of 1.00 for us being the road team, and .00 for Arizona) just after halftime. That's surprising since we only had a 13-0 lead with about 25 minutes left to play.

    We dropped below .50 wp (the probability of a win being a toss up) after Arizona took the lead. We got back up to .55 wp after a 20 yard gain by Bess on the ensuing drive. And then Naanee happened.

    We went from .55 wp for to .15 wp against on the Naanee fumble. That's obviously a huge swing.

    The Sean Smith INT and the Hartline 80 yard TD gave us another huge swing back up to .85 wp.

    As for the players, Burke's numbers give Tannehill a modest performance. But that has to be because of the two turnovers late in the game, which were certainly not all (or even mostly) on him. Naanee's one play basically wiped out Bess and Fasano's production combined. Hartline was great (.39 win probability added, 11.3 expected points added). But Bess was really good as well (.31 wpa, 7.3 epa). So it's saying a lot that Naanee's one play (-.43 wpa, -8.9 epa) was worse than Bess' entire output.

    For the season so far, Tannehill is now in the positive as far as win probability added. But looking at adjusted yards per attempt instead of win probability, he's in decent shape for a rookie. Even with a mediocre performance Reggie Bush is playing very well. To my surprise, Devon Bess is leading all WRs in win probability. That doesn't mean he has necessarily been the most productive. He hasn't. But that does suggest that he has been very productive in important situations. Given his history and my eyeball test, I'd assume that's because he is great on 3rd down. He is a big difference in punting the ball away and keeping possession. And possession is an important aspect in win probability.

    Defensively, Wake has been pretty good. He ranks pretty high in WP and expected points added. Randy Starks has been about as good from the DT position. Sean Smith's huge game against Arizona puts him in the top 10 in terms of wpa and epa for CBs. We won't be facing Kevin Kolb every week. But hopefully Smith can come close to matching his performance thus far.

    If you just looked at our win/loss record you could come away with a fairly negative impression of this team. And don't get me wrong, we have some big issues. But I think there's a fair bit to be optimistic. A few plays here and there and it's a pretty different outlook on the season.
     
  2. jsizzle Banned

    2,935
    496
    0
    Jan 3, 2012
    I am betting we lose in OT, 24-21
     
  3. DevilFin13 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    10,059
    7,128
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    Well played. You can look at it in real time, iirc. I would get too distracted trying to follow it in real time though.
     
  4. KB21 Almost Never Wrong Club Member

    24,029
    40,478
    113
    Dec 6, 2007
    I haven't looked at the individual plays yet, but I do not think Bess had one catch yesterday where he did not convert a first down. There may have been one, but like I said, I haven't looked at the individual plays yet.

    What I like about WPA is that it takes into account situational things that improve your chances of winning the game. I also like some of the other statistics that football outsiders put out there for that same reason. For example, gaining 2 yards on 2nd and 1 is better than gaining 18 yards on 3rd and 24.

    That's another thing I want to look at with Ryan in this game. He had a ton of yards, but how many of those yards were actually failed completions.
     
  5. DevilFin13 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    10,059
    7,128
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    That could be another reason Tanny's wpa/epa weren't better. I think it's also because he didn't throw more TDs. To have 400+ yards and only 1 TD is probably kind of odd.
     
  6. HardKoreXXX Insensitive to the Touch

    20,459
    14,210
    113
    Apr 2, 2008
    Coral Springs, FL
    Tannehill's YPA stood out to me as well. Pretty excellent for a rookie.

    You look at some of the guys he's ahead of right now: Brees, Stafford, Cutler, Rodgers

    He's taking shots down the field, which is great. To have a YPA that high after 4 games is no small feat, all things considered.
     
  7. Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    DevilFin13 likes this.

Share This Page