1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

You guys sick of Tannehill yet?

Discussion in 'Out of Bounds' started by mynmisoli, Aug 21, 2016.

  1. NCPhinFan

    NCPhinFan Active Member

    172
    154
    43
    Sep 22, 2014
    The fact that the Bills signed Tyrod Taylor to a $90 million/6 year contract after one decent season says a lot about your team's management....
     
  2. smahtaz

    smahtaz Pimpin Ain't Easy

    The knock on Tannehill is his red zone performance. He has moved the team from 20 to 20 throughout his career on a regular basis. It's starting to look like the coaching staff finally gets it. I'll take Gase and Tannehill over Ryan and Taylor.
     
  3. buffalo5180

    buffalo5180 New Member

    9
    7
    0
    Jul 19, 2016
    The contract we signed Taylor to has an out to it, it was a very friendly contract for the franchise, and for Taylor as well. And correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Miami do the same thing with Tannehill? Sign him to an extention after one decent year?
     
  4. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    No.

    Miami signed Thill after 3 years of steady improvement under circumstances so bad no QB has ever thrived under them.
     
  5. Fin-O

    Fin-O Initiated Club Member

    11,314
    11,255
    113
    Sep 28, 2015
    Besides Nick Foles of course....but thats not important.

    It sounds so much better when we throw around the word "ever" especially when you haven't the slightest clue about those circumstances. Keep fighting the fictional fight.
     
    Steve-Mo, dolphin25 and jdang307 like this.
  6. Pauly

    Pauly Season Ticket Holder

    3,567
    3,616
    113
    Nov 29, 2007
    Who would you rather as HC, Ryan or Gase.
     
  7. mynmisoli

    mynmisoli New Member

    8
    2
    0
    Aug 21, 2016
    I don't know. I have no idea what kind of head coach Gase is. You don't either.
     
  8. mynmisoli

    mynmisoli New Member

    8
    2
    0
    Aug 21, 2016
    Yes I'm serious. Tannehill or Taylor. Which one and why? Taylor is a big play quarterback and has great pocket presense. Tannehill is an athlete trying to play quarterback and hasn't developed a decent internal clock in the pocket after 64 starts in the NFL. Only thing Tannehill does better than Taylor is staying healthy.
     
  9. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    If you're serious, then Slapdick was the proper nickname for you.

    No QB has ever had to deal with the handcuffs that Thill did and thrive. No QB has had a that bad of an oline, not allowed to audible and had no run game. Even one hit wonder Nick Foles had no oline and maybe wasn't allowed to audible, but he still had a running game as the Eagles lead the league in rushing yards and was 4th in attempts, while Thill this past year (for example) had to deal with a worse oline, also not allowed to audible, but we were last in rushing attempts and 23rd in yards rushing.

    And in spite all of that, Thill is poised to turn heads this season.

    So yeah, thill far and away over Taylor.
     
    resnor likes this.
  10. Ronnie Bass

    Ronnie Bass Luxury Box Luxury Box

    16,129
    10,271
    113
    Dec 19, 2007
    Isn't it interesting dolphin25 gave this troll a like......hmmmmmm
     
    Fin D likes this.
  11. Fin D

    Fin D Sigh

    72,252
    43,684
    113
    Nov 27, 2007
    Is "interesting" the word you looking for or was it "pathetic"?
     
    Ronnie Bass likes this.
  12. Ronnie Bass

    Ronnie Bass Luxury Box Luxury Box

    16,129
    10,271
    113
    Dec 19, 2007
    Either work well, but I do like your choice better
     
    Fin D likes this.
  13. dolphin25

    dolphin25 Well-Known Member

    4,488
    1,384
    113
    Nov 22, 2014
    isn't it interesting you follow me around like a puppy.

    and isn't it interesting you don't want the Dolphin to sign Tannehill long term..... cause that is the post of his I gave thumbs up on.
     
    Finster likes this.
  14. Fin-O

    Fin-O Initiated Club Member

    11,314
    11,255
    113
    Sep 28, 2015
    I can see both sides of a Tyrod or Tanny argument. But no matter what side you are on, if you think its a "no brainer" then you are simply too emotionally invested in the topic.

    My take? I guess it depends on the surroundings. With our OL issues the past few seasons we NEED a QB who can get out of trouble and make plays. Thats Tyrod. If we have the luxury of a good pocket I would opt for Tannehill.

    Too many posters dont have it in them to see the other side of the coin. If you do not agree with them? You are a blank blank blank.
     
    jdang307, Steve-Mo and Finster like this.
  15. mynmisoli

    mynmisoli New Member

    8
    2
    0
    Aug 21, 2016
    I like how Tannehill was great at throwing dump offs and QB keepers again. He's awesome.
     
  16. NCPhinFan

    NCPhinFan Active Member

    172
    154
    43
    Sep 22, 2014
    Hate to disappoint you, but Buffalo lost too.
     
  17. mynmisoli

    mynmisoli New Member

    8
    2
    0
    Aug 21, 2016
    You're right. Our OLine sucked *** and if Dareus wasn't addicted to drugs he would have been able to stop the 4th quarter runs that would have gotten the ball back. Yes we got problems but atleast we aren't stuck with Tannehill.
     
  18. 3Pmi

    3Pmi IT Specialist Staff Member Administrator

    2,537
    6,446
    113
    Mar 23, 2008
    Michigan
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page