-
-
-
Sadly, the media constantly loved and fawned over Urlacher, from the point that he was in college until the day he retired, while Zach was almost always a side note. None of us need to have it argued that Zach is just as worthy. The fact that he gets ignored even after the logjam has passed is tragic.
-
Forget Pedro,vote for Zach.
-
They'll put Bruschi in before Thomas. Sad but true.
-
Zach Thomas was a guy who I always thought as a kid exemplified the way you play the game at a high level. Intelligence, preparation, hard work and a motor that never quits. Not only that but he was undoubtedly the glue that held our defenses together.
If we won a single Superbowl he would be first ballot.Unlucky 13 likes this. -
He has several strikes against him.
1) His low draft position and the lack of hype that surrounded his first two or three seasons.
2) He went about his job in a business like manner. There was almost no showboating the way Ray Lewis or Brian Urlacher did.
3) No SB ring.
4) Playing a position that doesn’t generate a lot of high profile stats like sacks.
Some positions like MLB, DT, interior OL and safety are just under-represented in the HoF. Zachary played an un-sexy position and retired without a SB ring. He didn’t have a hype train telling everyone he was great. I think he was a better MLB than Ray Lewis because I think while he made slightly fewer “splash” plays I cannot remember Zach gambling and getting caught out of position the way Ray Lewis sometimes did. However HoF voters remember the hype and the splash plays and the SB rings. -
-
Unfortunately people see those splash plays and dont remember the times you were out of position. -
No question Zach belongs in the Hall. Has the numbers for it.
-
-
Should be but won't.I don't think the pundits appreciated him as much as some of us.
-
firedan likes this.