That's a good read. I figured he was more unhappy with his personal performance and not being a typical diva receiver after a solid team win in week 1. I am confident he's the guy we need not just for what he does with the ball, but without it, as evidenced by the solid days Tannehill, Hartline and Gibson had. We will give Joe Haden his moral victory and take the real W!

 

See if this works for a direct link:

http://miamiherald.typepad.com/sports-buzz/2013/09/mike-wallace-has-points-to-make-beasley-evaluation-ross-pursuit-canes-marlins.html

Nice to hear Tannehill was at his charity event, and they shared a warm hug. That kind of stuff goes far off and on the field, I would imagine.

Also, as always, moms rock!

 

When they start giving each other reach arounds you will know there is chemistry.

 

Dutch Rudders for Playoff Wins...get on it.

 

I think Tannehill has to do a better job of recognition of Wallace's skillset so I'm not blaming everything on Wallace..there were some opportunities left on the field where If the Qb was more aware he could of checked into something big.

All part of the learning curve and this thing called chemistry.

 

Right...like that play that went to Hartline and he got to the 5, when Wallace was WIDE open in the endzone. He's gotta trust Mike more.

 

ha! Perhaps not the type of chemistry we're after... Watching the pats game last night, they do a great job of getting guys open with play calling - even if stone hands reigned all game. Hopefully sherman can work something out to get wallace going and set up some less forced deep scenarios.