Tyson clabo did lose the game, yes. I'm not out of my mind. Everything was going fine until Mario Williams started singlehandedly stopping our offense. You can say Mario Williams won the game for the bills if that makes it sound less accusing of clabo, but that pos we have at RT is why we lost.

 

Ryan Tannehill did have a really bad game. He stared down receivers all day and rarely went through his progressions. When he did go through his progression, he made plays...he needs to do this more. I blame coaching though more than anything. Playcalling, coming out flat, dumb penalties...you can put all that on coaching. Offense was anemic the majority of the day, you have to fault that on the coaches. The o-line had a average day which is good for them but Clabo wet the bed when it did matter most. You cannot deny that.

 

**** Clabo with a rusty screw driver.

 

Bull****, Football is SITUATIONAL, the offensive line, once again, failed under pressure and tbh, I'm personally pissed about it.

Heads need to roll, and no, I'm not kidding, if it comes down to "execution" then I'm in favor of it

 

He also swung the differential in the opposite direction when he threw a career high 3 tds. Clabo, on the other hand, did exactly what he's done all season.

Suck.

 

That's not on the coaching staff? I find that pretty hard to believe. I agree that Ryan Tannehill had a bad game, but play-calling was an issue again, both offensively and defensively. Too many 3rd and long conversions given up on the same plays that were given up in games 3 and 4 weeks ago. Up by a point with four minutes left and 3 straight passes were called. Leaving Tyson Clabo without help on the strip-sack.

Execution was bad, but it's certainly not all on that. Ultimately, it's up to the coaches to put players in good spots to execute, and I don't think the staff have done a good job of that since week 2. Even Joe Philbin said in his post game press conference that they didn't do a good job getting the team ready to play. Yikes.

 

Not a scapegoat. His inability to play his position has now lost us two games in crunch time. He couldn't stop Suggs when we needed it most. And he couldn't stop Williams.

Tannehill with time has proven he can be quite the qb. Which makes clabos inefficiency that much more glaring.

 

if you lost the game within the first minute of the game down only 7, then the their is something very wrong with your team....

 

Uhm yeah, 3 minutes left, he surrenders a strip sack fumble=GW FG

Same as that dog**** 2 weeks ago, and here you are defending that pooh.

DeNile is not just a river in Egypt

 

where did you come from, muffin?

 

it was referring to the team, if a team has lost the game within the first minute(and someone actually believes that) it says **** all about your team.

 

Barry Jackson just dropped a bomb of a tweet. Since monitoring sacks allowed became official in 2008, no offensive lineman - tackles, guards, and centers included - has allowed more than 14 sacks in a 16 games played. Tyson Clabo's on pace to let up 21.

 

I'd just cite the last two drives Miami had when they were playing with a lead as far as it relates to play-calling. Same with a lot of the play calls on 3rd down situations in the first half. It was an issue today and has been for a while.

 

Oh he's worse then that, his run blocking is dreadful as well.

This is why I'd happily go to his house, bring coffee, delete his Ipad playbook, and cut him with a smile.

I'd prefer Yeatman, Clabo is just soo ****ty, he is worse than Colombo

 

For me, you can't lose to this Bills team, at home, coming off a bye.

I thoughy tge play-calling was solid. Tannehill was not. You just can't spot a team 7 points like that. Mike Wallace may go down as one of the worst signings. What's the difference between him and Ginn?

Defense played well, but you have to tackle Fred Jackson at the end of the game. Our tackling was poor.

We're a very marginal team with little room for error.

 

For one, it wasn't one play. The drive prior to the strip sack he completely whiffs on Williams and gets tannehill killed. It was the hardest hit tannes taken all season. THEN he ****s the bed again on the next drive.

**** him. Can't believe there's a person alive defending him right now. I had a friend, a niners fan, text me after the game saying "that clabo guy needs to be put down like old yellor"

 

Nobody. The problem is that he is a 30 year old FA playing RT, its way too easy to point him out.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

 

I was wrong there, it was the drive before that one. Miami went 3 and out calling 3 straight passes. Even so, if not for a penalty, Miami's lost 9 yards on a sack, and you're looking at two more passes.

As for the last drive, with the fumble, that's squarely on Tyson Clabo. He got beat one-one-one to the inside.

 

I don't think play calling was the biggest problem... Execution on both sides of the ball was bad.. Ryan atoned for this poor start with some better plays but he did make a lot of mistakes.. The line played well enough but fell apart late.. Defense gave up too many big plays on third down.. But I don't blame play calling one bit.. Nice mix of run and pass.. Could we have run the ball 3 straight times and punt sure, maybe we break one for a first down.. I think joe want to put the dagger in their heart but failure to block Williams killed it.. Maybe not doubling him on key passing plays is on the coaches but I don't question the decision to throw it there..

 

Our offense almost executes the screen perfectly every time. it's the most ridiculous thing we do I think. there's only ever one player who can stop the screen, and that player stops it EVERY SINGLE TIME. We can fool the entire defense except for one guy and that ONE GUY will make the tackle right away. Its logic defying. Like maybe the opposing team even coaches against it that way. "Alright, you, you're job is to watch for screens. The other 10 guys will go about everything like normal but Im appointing you as the one who stops the dolphins screens. Don't worry, one guy is all we need"

 

I don't think you can swipe the pick six out the gate under the rug, he eye balled his receiver the whole time, and allowed the corner to make the play..Qb can't do that on the opening drive, it's demoralizing..

He's got to multitask more from the pocket, he's got to take more matters into his own hands..it's his team..he's the leader, it's a critical mistake that can lose ball games in this league..

 

Really though, what's the point of occupying a roster spot with Yeatman for the past 2+ years if there's almost no shot of him seeing the field?

If he hasn't developed into a player more capable than what we're getting out of Clabo till this point, then why keep him on the roster? If he's not better than the current Tyson Clabo, please free up the roster spot.

I say give the guy a shot.

 

I posted this in another thread, but I'll post here too:

Execution was much more of the problem. But coming out of the bye week, this is surely on the coaches at least a little bit. Isn't it supposed to be their job to put the players in position to execute properly. These were execution mistakes we see on Thursday night football games. Not something we should be seeing with an extra week to implement a game plan.....at home....against a below average defense

 

They ran 8 offensive plays, with a lead, and needing to spin clock and they called 6 passes and 2 runs. You can club Tannehill to death until your heart is content, that is horrific playcalling.

 

I've pondered it for weeks. Sherman KNOWS this quarterback, KNOWS this offensive line and continues to call the same **** over and over again.

Do we attack the middle of the field? No.

Do we run any screens? No.

Are we good in short yardage? No.

Are we good in 3rd and 2-4? No.

Does he move his athletic quarterback around? No.

I'm done. This team is cooked. We're going to get blown out of the building next week. 7-9 here we come.

 

Playcalling was solid? Play calling in the last four minutes was god awful.