Page 1 of 2
-
-
So like gase said he can make tannehill good. Now flores thinks he can make parker good? I hope he is right for several reasons.
-
Actually not a bad deal at all depending what the incentives are.
When I listen to Parker talk I honestly feel like he wants to be out there contributing. I dont mind giving him an audition with a new staff as he comes into what should be his prime.
He doesnt come across to me like a guy that doesnt care. I just think he needs some good coaching and maybe the change will motivate him to succeed.
Edited Add On: Also like it's a two year deal. It gives him every incentive to light the field on fire and play for another contract. Smart move for us to buy low on a big ceilingLast edited: Mar 12, 2019resnor likes this. -
-
-
-
resnor likes this.
-
-
-
I don't mind it. Guy has the talent. See if a new staff can get something out of him. Deal isn't overly expensive or lengthy if you can't.
Cap wise, do incentives count at the max amount possible against the cap?resnor likes this. -
-
-
-
Could Parker's extension be related to the QB move. His catch radius and ability to win jump balls would help bail out Taylor or Bortles if they are the next QB.
WR continuity may be an asset when bringing in a veteran QB with accuracy issues. The current group of Dolphins WR may have disappointed us with their play-making ability, but their spacing on routes seems much better then when they had guys freelancing or not knowing the plays. For Chad O'Shea, implementing a new offense with known pieces might be more valuable then having it hampered by new players adjusting to Miami lifestyle, players, etc.
I haven't been excited over the QB options, but the team had more of an identity with Matt Moore. If the offense reverts to a play-action, gunslinger throws, and power running blocking, the team might be more competitive week by week. -
IMO, Flores was hired, not for his X's and O's, but for his management style and his ability to relate. I had written Parker off; however, if Flores can help change Parker's attitude for the better and turn him into a legit WR, then I will give the guy major props. I believe this situation has major challenges and will be a good measuring stick for Flores and his ability to connect with his players or not. I sure hope it works out.
-
By the time we rebuild the roster in 2-3 years Amendola will be older and less viable than he is now.
With Parker you're just giving a young talented player a chance to see whether he can be part of the long term picture.
It's not a lot of money and incentive driven.
Why are you so angry about every move they make?resnor likes this. -
For a deal that is 2 years for $10 million? I don't hate it, but I don't know how Parker learns to be durable. I think he remains a 'if only' kind of player.
-
I don't think it's a bad move. What receiver are you getting for Parker's new price that is better?
Irishman likes this. -
resnor likes this.
-
-
-
Irishman and Unlucky 13 like this.
-
resnor likes this.
-
I hate this move. I hate this guy. I hate the way he plays. And I really HATE how soft he is. NEVER fights for the football or helps his qb out. Always out for weeks on end with a hangnail. The softest football player. We have on the team.
We resign this jerkwad and let a decent player like James walk. And Parker is at a position where there is actually a little depth and James is leaves a massive hole. This move stinks. -
Puddin' Pop Parker. I wonder how many games he will miss this year because he got a bad haircut?Irishman likes this. -
Better than the 5th year option. Like that it's incentive loaded. Maybe that will light a fire under his ***. He's been underwhelming, but believe he still has potential, but the likelihood of him taking advantage of that is slim IMO.
Irishman likes this. -
Someone mentioned this in Club, where if Devante puts together 1 or 2 productive seasons on this contract, much like the Eric Rowe signing, and then signs a big deal somewhere else, we'll get compensatory picks out of it.
Irishman and texanphinatic like this.
Page 1 of 2