I have at QB:
Phil Rivers
Big Ben
My WRs are:
V. Jackson
Santana Moss
Ted Ginn
Bernard Berrian
Jacoby Jones
I put both QBs on the block looking for either a WR or RB.
I just got offered DeSean Jackson for Big Ben. They both have about 100 fantasy points so far on the year.
Should I take it, or look for something more? He has McNabb at QB and Eli on the bench.
I feel like I should take it as Jackson instantly becomes one of my regulars, while Ben (or Rivers) don't help me much from the bench.
Tags:
-
-
i would think really hard about it, and then do it.
-
Try to pry one of his backup QB's off of you. Ben for Jackson/Backup QB is the way to go. Drop one of the WR Scrubs to make room.
Try to get Mcnabb to match up with Jackson for double points. -
I wouldn't do it straight up.
In my league Rothlesberger has 155.0 pts and DeSean Jackson has 104.50 pts. To me that 50 pts is fairly significant.
I would wait for a better offer. But that's me. -
I think you should do the deal. Big Ben is not a every week starter while Rivers probably is. The risk with Jackson is he runs alot of deep rooutes and won't get alot od TD's other than those. I would see if I could not get a Back-up QB from him and than throw in Ted Ginn in your deal as well
-
Big Ben and Jackson I said in my league both have 100 fantasy pts (103.5 vs 100.5). 3 fantasy pts is not significant to me, especially since I only lose 7 fantasy points on the season by going with Rivers. Jackson had significantly more points than any WR on my team not named Vincent.
It's not like I can start 2 QBs in a week, but I can start 3 WRs. -
I for SURE take that trade...and I wouldn't think twice about it. Comparing points overall (150-104) is comparing to apples to oranges. Of COURSE Big Ben puts up more points..he's a QB. DeSean is a top 10-15 WR right now in most league formats. With Rivers and a healthy FA I take that trade and don't look back.
-
Like I said they are only 3pts apart in my league. :lol:
I accepted anyway.