Quick Sunday night update: Sensing the Dolphins were potentially headed in this direction, agent Drew Rosenhaus said during his weekly segment on WSVN-Fox 7 that he asked the Dolphins to release Brian Hartline so that Hartline could go into the market and explore his options and also give the Dolphins an opportunity to re-sign him.
Rosenhaus said the Dolphins have interest in re-signing Hartline and didn't rule it out. But as Armando Salguero noted, Hartline has interest in teams closer to his native Ohio and with an established quarterback, making the Colts an appealing option. Rosenhaus said he expects Hartline to sign somewhere this week.
Rosenhaus, who does not represent Mike Wallace, also said he believes Wallace will remain with the Dolphins because the team needs him after releasing Hartline and Brandon Gibson. He said he feels that way even though he knows Miami is trying to trade him and also believes they have asked him to take a pay cut (which has been confirmed by people close to the situation).
Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...chatter-heat-captax-change.html#storylink=cpy
-
Yeah I don't think "an established QB" throwing to Hartline was the issue, but you do you Bry
Mcduffie81, djphinfan, Larry Little and 5 others like this. -
Browns would have been a natural fit IF they had a QB. No free agent WR in their right mind would want to go there, your numbers are going to suffer.
-
Established QB......LOLOLOL
He obviously wants to goto Indy, they can pay him 5M and he can play with the best QB south of Aaron Rodgers for years to come. Don't blame him for that I suppose, may be a place he can catch 55-60 balls for 750 yards and 0 TDs. -
I don't see it... but I don't know how the money aspect works. If we cut him and he has all that guaranteed money, wouldn't resigning him just add to that? Wouldn't it have made more sense to restructure (something he was reportedly open to do)? Not sure I believe anything from Drew.
-
Pennies on the dollar
-
-
-
Assuming both players can be signed for salaries that are consistent with "depth" rather than "starter," Hartline and Gibson would be perfect backups on this team. Both are familiar with the offense and the quarterback, and Hartline can play both outside positions, while Gibson can play both in the slot and outside.
-
-
-
Don't think there is a shot in hell Hartline is re-signed, we would've just offered him a pay cut and kept him to avoid this mess.
I do wish Hartline the best, could see him a fit with the Browns/Colts/Bengals.
Browns don't have established QB, but do have serious need at WR and could use a guy who will show up week to week.
Colts, if Reggie is finished I could see that being a destination. They did just sign Duron Carter, have TY Hilton, and like their rookie Moncrief, if I was them I'd keep it youg and athletic around Luck, that team should progress very well. Hope we can copy their formula for their receiving corps through the draft.
Bengals are a team I could see a good fit. Why? Well, Dalton always has lacked a #2 guy who can consistently be there. Marvin Jones and Mohammed Sanu are both better athletes than Hartline but neither have put together a full season healthy. Why not add Hartline as a veteran presence to be a security blanket. They've invested a lot in the draft at WR and don't see it as a major need a veteran FA might be just what the doctor ordered. -
Guest
With Wayne a FA and recently ineffective and no one else behind Hilton, Indy might be very willing to pay Hartline. They've overspent before:
Erik Walden
Trent Richardson
Gosder Cherilus
LaRon Landry
Gary Brackett
Vontae Davis since he's getting paid about $10 million per season
Arthur Jones -
-
Couldn't be happier that Hartline more importantly for money and lack of production. I think we can easily find a improved replacement for less money and more talent through the draft or FA.
Who you looking for at WR upcoming Fin D? -
-
Enjoy Johnny Football, Hart.
-
PhinFan1968 To 2020, and BEYOND! Club Member
-
Guest
Hartline didn't say Miami doesn't have an established QB, he says he'd prefer to go to a team with one. That doesn't preclude re-signing here but it does preclude him from Buffalo, NYJ, Cleveland, Washington, etc.
invid likes this. -
I don't think Hartline's comment about playing with an established QB was a slight against Tannehill. I believe he was just saying if he's going to another team, it'd rather be with an established quarterback than a rookie or a sorry veteran.