On ESPN insider Scouts Inc rated like 2500 players. I won't post the scouting reports but I will post each player's ratings.
Before you get mad at the ratings make sure you look at the Grading Scale that they use.
GRADING SCALE:
100-90 Elite Player
89-80 Outstanding Player
79-75 Solid Starter
74-70 Good Starter
69-65 Adequate Starter
64-60 Good Backup
59-55 Adequate Backup
54-50 Marginal Backup
49-45 Below Average Backup Player/Core Special Teams Player
20 Developmental Player
-
-
-
-
Was just going to mention that. Interesting how they missed that guy. And Jake's a 78? Seriously?texanphinatic and ascii like this.
-
My thoughts exactly. After I saw that I quite reading. :pity:
-
did i miss sean smith??
-
No Sean Smith either... but I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and say that he would be a 20.
Larryfinfan, djphinfan and Fin D like this. -
Opinions are like..........
I wonder what some of the other teams grade out like? -
Patrick Cobbs is way to low. IMO, if he isn't a good backup I don't know what is.
EDIT: And LOL at Pennington not being a rated a solid starter. -
Randy Starks is barely a good backup.
-
Sorry, but that scale is absolute BUNK.
If simplify it and just rank the Phins roster top to bottom, it wouldn't look anything like that what-so-ever.
Seriously? Jason Allen should be well behind the next 15 or so listed after him. No credibility at all IMOskippysphins and djphinfan like this. -
What's the difference between a good starter and a solid starter? They seem like the same term to me.
Alex44 likes this. -
-
Chad Pennington is only a good starter? What does somebody have to do to be considered a solid starter? Win 12 games? Throw for 4,000 yards?
Alex44 likes this. -
I think you have to play within the vacinity of Bristol, CT.2socks, PhinsRock, Frumundah Finnatic and 4 others like this.
-
Al Johnson is on the list as a 20 (developmental player).
a. He is not on our team
b. He has already been cut from another team since leaving Miami (New England)
c. He is not a developmental playerAlex44 likes this. -
more proof all espn is a ****in joke
-
Dont payattention to these people I think all of our players are better then they have it posted there
-
don't bode well for the season according to this scientific analysis
this is a bad thing -
:lol: As if we needed more. The other day I happened to stop on Sportscenter to see Ashton Kutcher being interviewed about the Chicago Bears. :pity:
-
I saw Joey Porter rated as a 73 and that immediately let me know that this is a piece of garbage.
-
Jason Taylor is an adequate starter.... OK. And at least half of the team are developmental players. They have all of four players that rate even as well as 'solid starter'. Wow. I don't need to look at this any further.
Crappy Tipper likes this. -
The guy who compiled that list, almost did less for his money than Eric Green...
-
and you have to pay for that service.
-
More of a comical read than anything really substantive. ESPN is a joke.