I don't see anyone defending one of if not the worst offensive coordinators in the league anymore. Anyone who wants to try and defend this overrated antique can forget about it. Think really hard before you respond. You will need a very good argument to not make everyone realize the truth. The truth is he is the worst play caller in the league. Look at the offensive stats and tell me I'm lying. Buffalo is ahead of us in points by like 50. How in the Hell is Buffalo having success with all these injuries and a banged up O-line, but we can't? I've been saying for years now that Dan Henning is the weak link to this offense. Miami has good players and a very sub standard coaching staff. A team like New England has good players and a good coaching staff. You can see the consistent results. As a diehard Miami Dolphins fan, I have the right to express myself and demand to the owner, Ross, that a change(s) be made IMMEDIATELY. Before it's too late. There is still a glimmer of hope to this season. As long as Henning is still calling the shots, that glimmer disappears very quickly.
:pity:
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Great post but the season is over for us there is no glimmer. We are 4 1/2 games behind the jest and Pats with 6 games left . Do the math it's over.
-
I'm with yah Merauder... Me and my wife have been ranting on Henning all season! He's vanilla and predictable. I can normally call the play from my couch! That's not good...
Not sure where the 4 1/2 comes from? It would be 3 wouldn't it? -
Maybe you guys in SoFla should stage some kind of rally, either in Davie or at the stadium.
-
If Sparano or Ross had any balls, Henning would have been fired by now. But it's because he is Bill Parcells golf buddy that he hasn't been.
-
Great post. IMHO, Dan Henning is doing a much worse job as offensive coordinator than Pasquiloni was doing as defensive coordinator last year. If he's not replaced, I'm not sure how much longer I can watch these performances.
-
I agree Henning is terrible.
But there is no point in calling out fellow board members. It's not like people on the forum are keeping him employed.
Stay classy San Diego.BlameItOnTheHenne likes this. -
As I've stated elsewhere, I'll be a Dolphins fan till the day I die, but this season is making me mental. Even more so than the 2007 disaster because of the expectations and up and down roller coaster ride this season has been. -
The games aren't even all that much fun to me anymore. I get very little pleasure from wins and the losses don't even matter to me so much. I have no expectations of success and no reason to believe any is forthcoming. It sucks, but it's the way it is with this team. -
At some point the building either is opened or you scrap the whole project and spend ten years in litigation. We're headed for litigation territory here -
I think right now the "building" part of this team is frustrating us all because it's being built by a blind foreman (sparano) and a senile carpenter (henning). Meanwhile, the electrician (nolan) is looking over at them saying "wtf are you guys doing?"
-
This team can build all it wants. If the coaching doesn't improve, the mediocrity will continue. Look at the top teams in the league. They all have great coaches. The jury is still out on Sparano, but IMO, Henning has proven his ineptitude. To continue on with him calling plays is absolute madness as far as I'm concerned.jetssuck likes this. -
I bet that sparano will get rid of Henning, so iam not worried, and Sparano has shown me enough to give him his 4th year..
Its always been 4 years Blitz...come on man, you know that's what's fair before you go all LOCO and sh$#...lol -
lol. another henning thread. well just too have one voice defend the guy I'll step into the void. The problem with this team is our personnel not our coaching. We dismantled our offensive line and replaced it with a good pass blocking unit that couldn't run block to save its life. That's acceptable except for the fact that we didn't have a QB who could attack cover 2 and unfortunately for us, our first half schedule had us play against cover 2 almost exclusively. When we didn't we scored. When we did, we got shut down and became a field goal offense. So basically we didn't have the personnel to either pass or run but other than that we were fine. Henning got the most out of this below average unit as almost any offensive coordinator could have. Could Cam Cameron or Norv Turner have gotten more? Probably. Could Mike Mularkey or Brian Schottenheimer? Not a chance
The question of the 2010 season is why did we go away from run blocking offensive linemen? This was not on Henning since I doubt he has any input into the personnel. This is a question for Sparano and Ireland. My feeling is we probably saw that we had to improve our defense and offensive line but chose 2010 to be the year we concentrated on defense as evidenced by our offseason focus on that side of the ball. We had probably hoped for more progression from Henne and underestimated how badly our run game would be effected by our new linemen.
I wouldn't panic too much however about the offense in that I fully expect 2011 to be used almost exclusively for offense just as 2010 was for defense. I expect at least one run blocking mauler if not two to be added and probably a speed WR or a speedy TE who can stretch the seam. Also, Henne should improve once again with another year under his belt so the personnel will be more suited to scoring touchdowns, especially in the red zone
Henning may retire. After all, why put up with the crap. He's got two rings and can laugh his *** off at anyone questioning him. Or he may decide to stick around for another go round if Ireland promises him the personnel needed to field an effective offense. The interesting thing to me will be watching Bill Parcells. Supposedly he's looking for a new team to rebuild but at the same its been said that he enjoys his relationship with Ross. If Parcells stays on I expect Henning to stay on. Parcells won't be swayed by the media or the fans. If Parcells bolts I could Henning stepping down to be replaced by David Lee. This to me will be an almost mirror image of what happened in Carolina and Lee will be our version of Jeff Richardson. The fact that year four is probably the do or die year for Sparano and company makes me wonder if they really want to go into it with an unproven coordinator or would they rather load up the draft and free agency with offensive players and give it to an old and proven hand to guide it. After all their jobs will be riding on the results -
That's what you said is your expectation is. D you see that as realistic? If it's not, why do you need a 4th year? -
-
We had probably hoped for more progression from Henne and underestimated how badly our run game would be effected by our new linemen.
i agree with this prez,,, but that is a pretty big mistake to make. then to stop your development of henne and put in pennington is a tough one also. they had to KNOW where henne was and KNOW where he was at and what he could handle and where he would struggle. if you have a plan then you gotta hang with it and take the bad with the good. i don't know,,,, that last game was an absolute debacle on many levels and being a fan its hard to try and analyze when completely pissed off. -
I'm not against giving this regime another year, depending on who else is available. I just don't think we're going to see anything all that different, unless our QB play improves dramatically.
I think you might actually see us spend a 1st round pick on a QB if one is available, as that might buy the regime more time and if they don't have any faith in Henne. -
I cannot blame Sparano for Henning and Irelands mistakes... I see us getting more talented, and youthful, but Sparano has had to deal with some poor personnell decisions from his staff, and the previous one. {Jason allen, Ted Ginn, Roinnie Brown, all young very high 1st round picks that were inherited by this staff, that flopped for this staff}. I think giving them their 4th year, is deserved considering all variables..however..
We have major oline and running back issues, I think both units have to be 90% rebuilt... -
-
No unit should need to be 90% rebuilt in the fourth year. And especially not two of them. So it takes three years to attempt to rebuild two crucial offensive units and fail miserably? I think Ronnie is good enough to keep around and draft another back or two but I'm sure they'll let him walk and he'll go set the league on fire in New England.
-
-
-
Yeah, I don't know about Henning being the whole problem. Remember when Mike Mularkey was here? Remember how "terrible" he was? Then he went elsewhere, and has been successful. Now we have Henning, and he is "terrible" too. LOL. How does every OC that comes here end up being "terrible?"
Also, I don't think it's fair to say that Ronnie Brown "flopped" here. This year has not been good...but, the run blocking has been terrible. I think we do need to find a speed back, but I also would hate to see Ronnie on the Pats running roughshod over the league...which is exactly what I think will happen if we let him go. -
KC is an up and coming team, no doubt, but like us they need to figure out if they have the right QB. -
The NFL is a coaches league and our OC is not putting us in the correct situation to be successful. I lost faith in the HC when he sat Henne down and started Pennington. That move right there set this team way back.
The fact that Sparano lets Henning embarrass our offense weekly with his horrible offensive game planning makes me think he has to be held accountable. Henning is a senile old man who needs to go and Sparano is the fool that lets him get away with it. -
-
Sparano, as his enabler, is as culpable as Henning. When 2 opponents' defenders over 2 consecutive weeks declare they knew what plays were coming 80% of the time, I don't care if it's Tom Brady and Chris Johnson behind center: the failure lies with the fossilized ideas of trying to fit square player pegs into round playcalling holes! It's clueless for Tony to state that the problem is in the execution, not the offensive planning, throwing the players under the bus for failure to succeed with predictable, circa 1990s plays- which may not even be designed to exploit their specific strengths. IMO,
Henning, the dinosaur should be put out to pasture immediately, but Tony should be held equally accountable for turning a blind eye to reality.
-
i think the wish to blame henning is based on the refusal to acknowledge the truth which is our offensive line cant run block and Henne cant beat cover 2 and blanket coverage in the red zone. what play calling allows for success when you are handed that type of team? it's easier to believe its one man, one person that you need to replace rather than to force yourself into the realization that you're going to have to spend your fourth year rebuilding the offensive line all over and that there is a risk that we may still have to find a QB. Its much easier to believe we have our QB and our offensive line is fine if not for poor play calling. I think the answer to what the FO and Sparano think about the play calling will come in the offseason. If Henning stays or if David Lee replaces him the play calling wasnt the problem since the same plays will be called with Lee as they were with Henning. If someone like Kubiak is hired then you will know that the FO agreed that the playcalling was the problem.
Once again the problem I have with the Henning criticism is I have yet to hear what kind of offense suits a QB who cant beat cover 2 (considering thats all we face now thats akin to not being able to pass) and an offense who cant run. Is there a coaching philosophy out there that allows you to move the ball without passing or running? If so thats the coordinator we need -
Things are getting stale with Dan Henning, predictable, and he's making mistakes in his play calling and now his game plans, under the strain. He's not adapting to the defenses that are adapting to him.
Also, Dan Henning did not want Brandon Marshall. He hates the idea of having a guy that demands that you feed him the ball. He wants a receivers unit full of yeomen with "no b-tches" (his words, not mine). It's not surprising that he buckles a little under the strain of trying to adapt his offense to having the exact kind of player he doesn't want.
When Chad Pennington first got to Miami, and Dan Henning was having one of his press conferences talking about Pennington, he mentioned that one of the reasons he felt Pennington's success suffered in New York is just because "things got stale, which happens."
That's exactly what's happened in Miami with Henning. And it's happened with Henning in most of his stops. He's been with 12 teams in his 31 NFL seasons. That's an average of 2.6 seasons per stint. Fittingly, his tenure in Miami is going to end after 3 seasons...and I'm sure this is complete coincidence, but this week we're starting to get widespread acknowledgement within the media and the team itself (see Herald article) that he's a lame duck, and so you could even say he only made it through his 10th game of his third season, which equates out to about 2.6 seasons.
Over his pro career he's had 2 one-year stays, 4 two-year stays, 4 three-year stays, and 2 four-year stays.
This is really what should have been expected all along. I guess we did expect that 2010 would likely be his last year, but we should have expected that he would likely come under fire even more strongly in that third year.Killerphins likes this. -
-
-
-
Same Henning Thread, Different Day.
Page 1 of 2