The injuries to Allen, Merling, Edds, Gardner, and Haynos have hurt the team.
Lighting up the waiver wire has not. We got rid of guys, some older, who were not going to play all that much. We added players, some younger, who are not going to play all that much.
I do question the Anderson for Carpenter trade off but, have a feeling we may add a vet OLB. I also would have liked to keep Ness to the practice squad. Aside from that, I believe we are just about the same team as before the cuts.
Opinions?
-
-
Samphin Κακό σκυλί ψόφο δεν έχει
It boils down to the following. Remember, the Dolphins were a financial failure last year. Ross is a businessman WELL before he is a football fan/owner. Cutting Grant, Douglas and Anderson saved him 5.7 million in salary (minus the minimum contracts doled out to their replacements). Putting Will Allen on IR saved him millions more (insurance pays that out).
Say what you want about Ross, but he is a businessman. Those guys don't try to make losing money a habit if they can help it.
Pandarilla and djphinfan like this. -
Well if we lose games, he'll lose money, so he best keep that in mind too, Sam.
LandShark13, jetssuck, huck1974 and 1 other person like this. -
Samphin Κακό σκυλί ψόφο δεν έχει
This could either backfire, or end up being a very shrewd move by someone who realizes that spending close to 6 million dollars on three bottem end defensive players who aren't being relied on to contribute much of anything physically for a team that lost money last year, and thus don't warrant the pricetag associated with them. -
Guest
Adalius anyone? If we got rid of Anderson for an ILB, I can envision us picking up Adalius. He's still a FA after all this time so he has to be cheap.
-
-
Samphin Κακό σκυλί ψόφο δεν έχει
-
vt_dolfan Season Ticket Holder Club Member
I think some of the concern is where cuts were made..leaving us very thin depth wise.
Frumundah Finnatic likes this. -
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
I highly doubt that Parcells, Ireland and Sparano sat down in a room with a pencil, paper and calculator and said..."Ok, so if we cut Anderson, Grant and Douglass, we'll save.....uuhhh, $5.7M...yeah, that's the ticket...Hey, Mr Ross, look what we did !!"
Conversely, Ross didn't come to Parcells and say "Hey, if you cut these three low rung guys, I can recoup some of my losses from this year, so let's go do it..."
First off, Parcells would be looking at the cost of keeping guys vs. letting guys go, but primarily he's looking at what he can do to improve the team. These moves were made because, collectively, the Troika think the product on the field will be better because of them...not solely because they are cheaper alternatives...
Now, the question is "Were they wrong or were they right ??" That can't be answered until we start playing real games again....Coral Reefer likes this. -
Samphin Κακό σκυλί ψόφο δεν έχει
Was it the only factor? No. But it is a big one. You can't overlook the dollars and cents of this company. You have to try very hard to lose money in the monster that is the NFL.
The reality is, these money saving moves aren't factoring into the top end of the roster persay. Ross is clearly okay with spending to get better (Marshall and Dansby being perfect examples of this), but he also trusts Bill to know that the difference in performance output between Charlie Anderson and Bobby Carpenter is closer than their paychecks would indicate.GMJohnson, cdz12250, Garryowen and 1 other person like this. -
The bottom of the roster dude, these players are a bit like Bic lighters or wooden matches.Noodle Arm likes this. -