Now I'm no oscar buff in fact I pretty much always think the oscars are a bit of a farce especially when they grant one movie the best picture award over an obviously better one. I want to know which movie you feel should not have won the best picture oscar?
Here's a list of winners and nominees:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Picture#Winners_and_nominees
For me it has to be without a doubt (and I'm sure many of you will agree) 1998 Shakespeare in Love.
1998 Shakespeare in Love
Elizabeth
Life Is Beautiful (La vita è bella)
Saving Private Ryan
The Thin Red Line
There is no way this film should even have been considered for best film it wasn't even particularly good as a light hearted romantic comedy which is essentially what the film is. Elizabeth is a far superior film. On top of that it beat out Saving Private Ryan. Now I'm not a big fan of that movie like most people are but I wouldn't ever put Shakespeare in Love ahead of it, in fact I wouldn't even put it in front of the Thin Red Line which I think is a terrible movie. :lol:
What are your thoughts?
Page 1 of 2
-
-
I am sure Titanic will get hammered though I think it is a great movie and better than those it was up against
-
I didn't think American Beauty was all that. Green mile was definitely better IMO
1999 (72nd) American Beauty
The Cider House Rules
The Green Mile
The Insider
The Sixth Sense -
I don't know I'd take L.A. Confidential or As Good As it Gets over Titanic, easily :yes:
unluckyluciano, HardKoreXXX, Rick 1966 and 1 other person like this. -
No way!!
-
easily :yes:... neither of those films made me laugh when I wasn't supposed to :lol:
-
Guess we will have to disagree
-
-
I'll go with 1994 and that pompus, holier-than-thou flick "Forrest Gump" winning the Award over a genuinely moving and insightful picture like "The Shawshank Redemption". Runner up is "The Return of the King" - worst part of the trilogy gets the Award that belonged to either "Mystic River" or "Lost in Translation". A shame they didn't have enough balls to give it to "The Fellowship of the Ring".
-
Disagree totally with your opinions on Forrest Gump and Return of the King.
-
I didn't think Annie Hall or American Beauty should've won. Good movies sure, but there were classics that got snubbed. I'm a bit biased towards American Beauty since it was filmed at my high school but the other four in that category were equal or better. And Star Wars (15th on AFI's top 100 movies list) should've won over Hall.
-
-
No Country for Old Men, granted it was a great movie I just thought it was overhyped.
-
-
You can have Cider House Rules it wasnt that great...
You're right The Green Mile and Sixth Sense were both EXCELLENT films that deserved the Oscar. -
-
-
-
-
Lost in translation though I would have given the award too, but they had been snubbing LOTR trilogy from what I remember.Last edited: Apr 18, 2008 -
1980 Raging Bull should have won over Ordinary People
1990 Goodfellas should have won over Dances with Wolves
1996 Fargo should have won over The English Patient
2002 Gangs of NY should have won over Chicago
I dont really have a problem with Titanic winning. I think LA Confidential is better but Titanic isnt bad imo. American Beauty and Forest Gump are no brainer wins imo.FinSane, finswin56 and finfansince72 like this. -
Well I agree on Shakespeare in Love, but the only reason I agree is because "Thin Red Line" was nominated, and Thin Red Line was an awesome movie plus it was the return of Terrance Malick into the world of filmmaking, which is something that should have received an award:
My candidates:
In 1964 My Fair Lady won for best movie beating out Dr. Strangelove (or how ... ...) which I can live with (I love My fair Lady) but I admit that Dr. Strangelove is a way more important and better movie than My Fair Lady.
By the same token a year later The sound of Music (this was Hollywoods heyday in Musicals) won the Oscar beaating out Dr. Zhivago which is one of the most important movies of the century...
In 1967 In the heat of the Night beat out both Bonnie and Clyde and The Graduate... and the Graduate is a far better movie.
I'll get **** for this one but in 1976 Rocky beat out "All the Presidents' men" which is again a better movie.
A HUUUGE one... in 1979 "Kramer vs. Kramer" beat out "Apocalypse Now" which is plain stupid.
And then the academy one-upped themselves giving in 1980 the Oscar to "Ordinary People" while leaving "RAging Bull" and "The Elephant Man" as simple nominees.
1989 also was a bad decision, they chose to give the oscar to "Driving Miss Daisy" instead of "Born in the fourth of july" , "Dead Poets society" or "My Left Foot"
Another enormous one happened in 1990 where they gave the oscar to "Dancing with Wolves" when "GoodFellas" was a nominated movie.
And as far as I am concerned, you can't give the Oscar to "Unforgiven" when "The Crying Game" is nominated, which happened in 1992
The "Forrest Gump" one is one that actually should bring up some debate since it beat up "Shawshank Redemption" and "Pulp Fiction" so you can argue the merits of all three of those movies.
I don't think "Braveheart" deserves anything... but there where no movies that year that where worth it (well Leaving las Vegas... but it wasnt nominated)
"English Patient" should not have beat out "Shine"
"American Beauty" is and should have won the Oscar. It is by far the best movie of that year and it is just a tour de force of awesome directing and acting, it has everything you need to make a movie wonderful and it is wonderful.
How "gladiator" beat "Traffic" completely escapes me, except for the Academy loves epics that make money... even if they are all glam and no substance.
There is no way in hell "A beautiful Mind" deserved to win. "In the Bedroom" was 100 times the movie that Beautiful was... not only that but that year gave us freaking Ron Howard winning the Best Director Oscar over Robert Altman, Peter Jackson, David Lynch and Ridley Scott all of which have waaay more talent than him in their pinky finger.
Chicago was not better than "The Pianist" despite what feelings we might have for Polanski (who actually did win best director)
Return of the king was not better than Lost in Translation (although both of them sucked... The best movie of that year was Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and it did not get nominated)
The aviator should have won and Scorsese should have won for that one.
Crash is not a better movie than Brokeback Mountain.
And The Departed should not have won either, the best movie that year was not nominated (Children of Men)DonShula84 likes this. -
-
Chicago might be the worst movie ever to win an oscar.
-
-
-
The Thin Red Line was a horrible mishmash of a movie.
While Fellowship of the Ring was better, Return of the King was a great movie and deserved to win.Phins28 likes this. -
-
To say that Unforgiven, Braveheart, Gladiator, and, Retrurn of the King, and Departed should not have won is blasphemy in my mind. Especially Braveheart, Unforgiven, and Departed. Braveheart set the standard for what epic battle scenes are now.Fin-Omenal likes this. -
dude I really like the departed then I watched the original series made in china and now I cant stand the film. It's such a hardcore rip off of the chinese film. Internal affairs saga for any and all those interested....
-
-
http://imdb.com/title/tt0338564/unluckyluciano likes this. -
You can buy it off amazon I think it was like 30 dollars made by the dragon dynasty company. -
-
-
Page 1 of 2