As we all know, Clark re-signed with the Steelers. Also an interesting note, Sharper recently had his knee looked at (arthroscopic surgery).
I do not think we go after Sharper.
Link: HERE
-
I wouldn't be surprised if we were more or less done with the current available FAs. Though I hope we at least intend to bring Ben Watson in for a look.
-
Guest
Anyone else tired of typing "poison pill" and "Atogwe" so much? It's getting pretty pathetic at this point. The best free safety out there. Poison pill him and no compensation. We'd be pretty much focused on OLB's and WR early in the draft and could get a NT in the third or fourth considering we also re-signed Jason Ferguson.:pity:
Edit: I mean available Free Safety. -
gafinfan likes this.
-
-
-
If we can't get Sharper, we have to get E. Thomas at #12. We can not afford to ignore this anymore. This is a pass-happy league, and this would really solidify our secondary for a long time. We would have the making of a great secondary for years to come.
-
-
Those clamouring for Earl Thomas will likely be disappointed. He was weak against the run at Texas and will get swallowed up in the run game at the NFL level. Certainly not in the Parcells mold for a defender. If Berry is off the board, I see Mays as being in play.
-
Earl Thomas can become acceptable against the run, which would be enough with his coverage skills.
PHINFAN 4 LIFE likes this. -
josephreese and gafinfan like this.
-
-
-
Thomas was not weak against the run in college, he was average at worst. Except he was exceptional with the ball in the air, getting numerous pass deflections and interceptions. He was plenty good at separating the ball from those who got their hands on it, and bringing down WRs who did manage to hold on to it.
I'm not saying Thomas is the right pick at 12, but he would be infinitely better than Taylor Mays. -
i would love sharper for a year so Clemons would learn from him but i think he will resign with NO
-
-
Sharper still seems the best bet IF the FO thinks Clemons will be ready in another year or two. Otherwise I believe we must take Earl Thomas at 12. JMHO
-
-
At this point I'd rather they sign Sharper than bring in some moron garbage S that will not only suck but block Culver and Clemons.
jetssuck likes this. -
What I am nervous about by not addressing FS or NT in Free Agency, it forces our hand to most likely have to draft there.
By making a strong move for Clark, it signals to me that they weren't planning on going F.S. in the 1st round, which then signals to me that they don't have a strong attraction to the F.S. that may be available when we pick.
If the Front office has faith that Clemons can step in a be a productive F.S. in a season or so, then I am all for grabbing Sharper for now, but with the way it looks he will resign with N.O.
I am not a "sky is falling" fan, but it does worry me that we are sitting here with still glaring needs at WR, NT, FS, and OLB and we can really only expect to find one or possibly two of those in the draft that can step in and really help this season. -
if we get earl thomas at 12 and he doesnt work out as a fs we could turn him into an wr that boy got mad good hands
-
-
Dansby was an example of a successful move.
When you fly a player in, meet with him all day, make him a decent offer, and you fully intend to sign him, I wouldn't exactly classify that as a luke warm or weak move. -
If your offer is subpar you can drive him from Carlsbad to the Chesapeake, buy him five porterhouse steak dinners along the way, and hire a few exotic dancers for him it doesn't matter.
The offer was not good enough based on what we know. 4/17 that he signed for in Pittsburgh is an extremely reasonable salary.