Not sure how you determine the connection is not there? His catching % is about the same as everyone else's.

 

Ah gotcha. My mistake.

 

Marshall shouldn't be a work in progress for all the money and the comp we surrendered. Eight drops and a 2.9 YAC. Fuggin' kidding me... That is the very reason I've been all over his ***. Chemistry with the QB or not BM is a pro bowl WR and he is playing like a backup. Sorry I know you are looking for excuses SB but no way in hell does Marshall get a pass with me. He needs to step up and prove his worth. That is the bottom line!

 

Marshall is a Pro Bowl WR who should be leading, not following. Last year he was at 68%, a YAC of 5, and had 8 drops all year with 101 catches.

 

Sorrry.meant to add this was before he got his big money

 

The stats you posted are facts.
The opinions you posted are excuses.
I would say Marshall doesn't fit this scheme before I would pin it on WR/ QB chemistry.
Either way no excuses for Marshall's lack of consistency this season. Sorry bro it falls on the player. He has to take full responsibility for this season so far in order for things to change. One TD is an atrocity.

 

How does Marshall NOT fit this scheme? This is the ideal scheme for him. Short to medium passing, and a run oriented team. Granted, our run game has been nonexistent...but that's not the schemes fault. Marshall is not a receiver to blaze by a DB to grab a 50 yard bomb. He's gonna catch a 10 yard slant, break a tackle, and go for 30 more.

 

Yeah sure.... We have seen that all season long right :words:

Come on now Henning doesn't move Marshall around at all which is part of his scheme. If the OC would move BM around a little more he might have success but then again Marshall doesn't have any focus or want to in him it seems so maybe it wouldn't make a difference.

 

Just remember that Marshall missed a great deal of camp and offseason work with Henne due to a hip issue, which got treated late in the process. That has likely had some affect on the combination, especially in their first year.

 

Thanks for pulling the stats SouthBeach. What actually jumps out at me the most is: Our most talented player on offense who excels at making plays once the ball is in his hand has virtually half the YAC as everyone else. What this tells me is that Marshall is being smothered and defenses are taking him away his strength.... which is what I've been saying all along.

This also tells me how important it is to get another pass catcher in here who can help draw the coverage away from Brandon so he has a chance to do his thing. What's the point of having an elite WR if we don't give him an opportunity to be elite? IMO this is a bigger problem than using a 1st round pick on a RB.

On a side note, this has gotta be driving Marshall crazy. I'd be frustrated as hell if I were him.

 

I don't see him not having focus (although I could see how it would appear that way). I see a guy who's incredibly competitive and frustrated b/c he knows he can do more to help this team but he's being draped in coverage and IMO he's putting too much pressure on himself to make plays during the the opportunities he has, that it's causing him to drop some balls etc. Just my opinion.

 

Which is exactly why we need a TRUE vertical threat to give him more space to operate under. By "true" threat I mean someone who is a threat to get deep on any given play, not someone who can merely get deep "occasionally". We all know that Hartline can get deep once in a while, but he does not truly threaten a defense or force them to worry about him blowing by their coverage to where they have to take coverage away from Marshall to protect themselves.

We need Mike Sims-Walker, AJ Green (virtually impossible), or Justin Blackmon. Or the guy I wanted this past preseason, Mike Williams from Seattle, could be a nice pick up since he'll be a FA.

 

Fair enough. Tossing the ball to your ex QB.
Lack of focus. Did he care and get back to the huddle.... Nope.

 

Excuses...... Marshall is being paid 50 million dollars and he still has 1 TD going into week 14.
The only break I give him is that he works for Henning's horrible offensive scheme.
Even then Marshall should never be a work in progress. Some players get a pass for being lackluster because of their name.
It is totally a copout.

 

All I heard were great expectations from Marshall. He was supposed to be the savior, the missing piece of the puzzle. That is all I heard here was how we now have a #1 and this offense is going to take off. The facts are BM drops footballs, does stupid things after he makes a routine play and now the guy is struggling to get back on the field. Those are the facts pal. All you have given me is someone elses opinion and the reasoning for why you are letting him off the hook. I'm telling you that so far Marshall has been a disappointment who isn't worth the money he is being paid. Believe me it makes a difference. Me giving you excuses for what? You are just pissed because I am right about Marshall being a fraud. The facts you have given me about Marshall have further reinforced my point. Nice try but you can't prove your theory is right and my eyes don't lie. Marshall was a waste of money and draft picks until he proves otherwise which won't be this season.

 

Seriously that is all you got..... :lol:

 

Fitz is also having some problems b/c Boldin isn't there to help him out with coverage...... which is also what can be said about Marshall here.

 

Yet Boldin has 7 TD's .
Fitz has 5 with Derek Anderson. :pointlol:
Marshall has 1 lonely TD.
After all scoring is the objective. :up:

 

In Denver, Brandon had players who threatened the entire field and forced defenses to cover more territory. Tony Scheffler can stretch the field and is a big difference maker in helping give receivers more space. Eddie Royal runs a 4.39. Gaffney & Stokley are veterans, not 1st, 2nd, or 3rd year youngsters. Their backs are solid out of the backfield. Heck, their receivers were good enough that this year's leagues leading WR was a backup.

I'm not disagreeing with your initial OP philosophy; I'm merely adding onto it. Your OP deals with the frequency of our WRs catching the ball. I'm focusing on once the receivers "do" catch the ball. Marshall doesn't have a 2.9 YAC b/c of lack of effort. Once he has the ball he's giving it 110% to make a play, but he just doesn't have the space to do so IMO, hence the very low YAC. This comes back to not having either: speed on offense, a threat at TE, a vertical threat, or a solid enough #2 who commands more coverage. Scheffler wasn't even their #1 TE IIRC but I could be wrong. I thought Graham was.

 

Marshall is far from a fraud. He's limited to being a possession receiver here b/c defenses can afford to drape coverage all over him, evidenced by his 2.9 YAC. Getting rid of Ginn severely handcuffed him. When people were getting excited about Marshall coming here, many of us thought it would finally be the first time where we got a true #1 to remove Ginn from the responsibility so that he could be a #2. You take away Ginn and dont replace his deep threat (or dont bring in a threatening TE), then you give Marshall no space to operate in. That's not on Brandon. That's on this organization for not being smart enough to put 2+2 together.

 

Boldin has 2 other stud WRs to help occupy coverage..... He also has an offense that forces defenses to cover every inch of grass. It's much easier for Boldin than Marshall.

 

Randy Moss's best year was his 1st in NE..... but it's pretty rare.

 

So going back to my earlier point it is either the player or the scheme or both.
Marshall wants it so bad he gets inside his own head and psychs himself out....Henning, well do I even have to say anything about the scheme. :pity:

 

I'll agree with you on Ginn. For speed alone he would have opened the field. I was floored when we traded him. Even being someone who bashed on Ginn repeatedly.

 

With ya on that. I wasn't a Ginn fan but I also didn't like that he was playing as our #1 when he should've never been such. I was actually looking forward to just seeing what the hell he "could" do as a #2 here...... like a gambler pulling down the slot handle.