Is it me or does this guy make it happen out on the field? I would toss him in with the starters and see what happens, as he has a really nice build and seems to catch the ball smoothly. Naanee should be cut with the performance he tossed up this preseason and I think most of you would agree. If they cut Mathews I'm going to be fairly jacked, sorry if there was a post on this guy already. I didn't watch the preseason under a microscope so I want to hear your thoughts.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Thanks, I've been out of the game for quite a while. Just wanted to hear other fan's opinions on him.
-
I agree with you 100%. Naanee should have been cut last week.
Steve-Mo, Larryfinfan, dolfan7171 and 3 others like this. -
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
I think he's been pretty decent. And, I hope he makes the team.
I also think Nanee has been very inconsistent - for a veteran, especially.TheAnswer385 likes this. -
He's done some good short to intermediate stuff... now if he can just get some separation on a deep route I'd be coo coo for cocoa puffs.
USArmyFinFan and TheAnswer385 like this. -
Naanee has actually been very consistent...consistently bad with the drops.Boik14, TheAnswer385 and Da 'Fins like this. -
The guy seems to get open and make good clean catches so it wouldnt upset me to see him make the team. I am also on the cut Nanee bandwagon the guy doesnt offer us anything besides dropping passes and if we wanted that we would have kept Ted Ginn.
dolfan7171 likes this. -
I've been very impressed by Matthews. He's a player. He reminds me of Devone Bess in a lot of ways, although he is bigger. He also reminds me of Anquan Boldin in his build and physicality. He is faster than Boldin and I wouldn't conclude that he can't get separation downfield -- we really haven't tried that with him much in the preseason, at least as far as I've seen.
I'd be pretty disappointed if he doesn't make the roster.MrClean, Steve-Mo, dolfan7171 and 1 other person like this. -
Ive liked what Ive seen from him. He's made some nice plays, helped move the ball for us. IIRC he had a few nice returns in the first few games as well. I'm sure he sticks. I'm guessing Cunningham does too since they were both new draft picks this year.
-
The guy I'm not as high on as everyone seems to be after the game is B.J. Cunningham. He didn't do anything we didn't already know he could do, or anything that poses a danger to the defense. Rishard Matthews did.
Cunningham continues to be a guy you can throw to on the drag or slant, or a middle screen...basically in-breaking routes against zone or man. But he won't wow you with run after catch on those plays, and you don't want to get him the ball on perimeter routes. He can run the slant but is questionable on the sluggo, for example.
Rishard Matthews actually separates and gets open, and he flashed the ability to make back shoulder plays last night which is key. Clyde Gates belongs because you can see in objective, observable ways what his speed does to a defense. And he also showed me (surprisingly) an ability to get open on routes versus press coverage this preseason.
The only other guy I feel fairly confident that gets open against man coverage after those two and Bess/Hartline...is Marlon Moore, who is also killing it on STs.dolfan7171, Stringer Bell and TheAnswer385 like this. -
-
I think he will make the team.
-
Got to give credit to CK on this one, he targeted the player from the get, with draft value being a big part of it and was right.
I'm a Colin Kaepernik fan, so ive seen him make some big time plays in college..
Matthews is strong, like what Fineas said, Potential of Bolden strong.
If you watch the comeback route in yesterday's game, not the one where he slipped, but the other one, he caught ball without lookin at it, I saw him identify where he wanted to go before he caught the ball.
Welcome to the team.Mexphin, MrClean, dolfan7171 and 1 other person like this. -
At Nevada, Matthews was the guy who made the play when the Pack needed one. He seemed to always do the right thing at the right time. He had a knack for getting separation using a a ton of different strategies, finding the right lane, breaking that tackle when it was crucial, etc. It was hard to say whether he was just that nuanced or was simply more athletic than he looked. It was probably a combination of both. He was the one receiver out of the new group of Egnew, BJ, Fuller, Nanee that I believed the strongest in.
CWBIII, dolfan7171, TheAnswer385 and 1 other person like this. -
We have nothing to lose at this point. Might as well start him and see what he's got. We pretty much know what Naanee is going to provide. A whole lot of suck.
-
-
http://www.thephins.com/forums/show...Draft-Thread&p=1747754&viewfull=1#post1747754
I drafted this guy in the GM League :thumbup1:Paul 13 likes this. -
I think Hogan is practice squad material at best.Steve-Mo, Stitches, Oghma and 1 other person like this. -
-
Omar is advocating that Naanee make the roster. He has said no other receivers other than Bess and Hartline had earned the opportunity. He must have ignored Matthews.
-
-
Omar tends to latch on to a few guys and seriously advocate for them. I have a bad feeling about Matthews not making the roster.
-
-
-
Sorry guys, Matthews is definitely going to be cut.
-
-
Was Naanee THAT good in practice for those of you that know?
-
-
-
Most definitely Matthews should stay. He's been consistent in the pre season games. I like how he plays....he has good hands. He can give you some kick returns so he helps in special teams. I would keep hima nd if Ireland cuts him I would be pissed too.
-
-
Regarding Matthews though, I've been liking him ever since Week 1 of the preseason when he made plays as a returner. Then, the next week he made some plays as a WR and on kick coverage. He made some tough catches taking big hits, caught that one while slipping, and powered his way for a TD. I am a pretty big fan. With everything else I'm seeing at the position, he better make this team... -
Cool story, Stringer!
Page 1 of 2