http://miamiherald.typepad.com/sports-buzz/
See what the other pundits have to say .None of the pundits suggested taking Tyler Eifert or Tavon Austin .
-
-
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
I like Hayden but would trade out of 12.
As many needs as there are (DE, CB, OT, OG, OLB, DT, WR still, S) I'd want to trade down maybe a couple of times into the low 20's and get as many 2nd / 3rd rounders as possible and still think we could draft Hayden there. I'd esp. want to do so if we landed Albert in a trade - to give us another 2nd.
Multiple picks are key.
Also, I like Fluker, but he has too many liabilities in pass pro, imo, to draft him at 12 (or for him to go in the top 10 as Mayock thinks). I think he holds better value at 18-20 and beyond. -
I prefer Watson, but Fluker is one heck of a RT imo, maybe a target if we trade down. I watched a lot of film of DEs going up against Fluker, and from what I saw he pretty much handled all of them. A beast in the run game and pretty solid in pass pro, this guy is a really good RT.
-
Here's some film- you can see the lack of quickness at :22 and elsewhere, he's just not the most agile player. Again, if I'm going RT early then Watson is my guy. If we go LT I was impressed with David Bakhtiari.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6eoZdR-ZTQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEwGbfY8rQ8
You're on the mark, Fluker would be better in a power scheme. -
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
There are a lot of quick DEs in the NFL who play on Fluker's side (some of the quickest pass rushers in the past few years attacked from there - including Wake and Freeney) - Fluker's inability to move his feet quickly would make it tough for him there which is why I think his value is lower in round 1. He does have incredible arms (his wing span is 86 inches!) and he's very strong and powerful. And, well-coached and a hard worker as best I can tell from watching him here in AL.
Watson does seem like a better fit in our scheme with better agility.