[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff8200"]
[td]LIE[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Joe Philbin is ugly[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]I seriously don't get this one. Here he is during his post game press conference.....
(Joe Philbin pictured here. Photo taken with the "3-0 Camera".)
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff8200"]
[td]LIE[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Joe Philbin has no personality.[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]This team is a no nonsense winner, that commits few penalties and is always prepared. They are never too high or too low. That is exactly how you'd describe Philbin. In fact, I think a case can start to be made that the Packers had Philbin's personality and not McCarthy's. We are starting to see not only cracks in their offense, but in their demeanor as well with Rodegrs and McCarthy needing to be split up yesterday on the sidelines. I thought that team was missing Philbin last year, and this year I'm sure of it.[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff8200"]
[td]LIE[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Tannehill can't win a game in the 4th.[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Not only did Tannehill march his team down the field 70something yards to the winning score, but he burned up most of the clock doing it, inspired his teammates, but most importantly, picked the game winning play. If that's not beautiful, then you didn't see him at his press conference........
(Ryan Tannehill pictured here. Photo taken with the "3-0 Camera".)
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff8200"]
[td]LIE[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Paul Soliai is replaceable.[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]30 rushes for 146. Both back up running backs had a 4.8 average. Coincidence?[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff8200"]
[td]LIE[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]A team has to be angry to win tough games.[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]I blame this lie on Rocky (The movie, not the poster. I blame syphilis on Rocky, the poster, not the movie.) We tried to be the lovable loser who took too many shots to the face while waiting for the magic moment when we got angry enough to win by throwing the same punch over and over. That didn't work for us. What we're seeing with this team is a methodical attack of our opponents weaknesses, winning with different players stepping up every week. We seem to always know what is happening and how to keep ourselves in it until the right moment. We are winning with intelligence and control instead of rage and emotion. We always have the trick up our sleeves, regardless of what the other team is doing.
We are not Rocky...
We are Batman.[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff8200"]
[td]LIE[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Mike Sherman is ugly.[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Seriously???!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!??! Here's his picture from his post game pc....
....if you tell me you wouldn't hit that, then you're a damn liar.
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[table="width: 750"]
[TR="bgcolor: #ff0000"]
[td]LIE ***(LATE ADDITION)****[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]The Falcons were injured.[/td]
[/tr]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]TRUTH[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ok, that's not a lie. They were injured. The lie is pretending we weren't equally injured. We didn't have Soliai or Patterson. Wake got hurt and didn't play most of the game. Wallace had some dings that seemed to limit his effectiveness as well.[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
-
Tin Indian, the 23rd, unifiedtheory and 19 others like this.
-
I like the stoic coach who doesn't get too high or low. Relying on emotion can only last you so long.
Fin D likes this. -
Lie: You can't/shouldn't fap to this thread.
Truth: I may, should, can and did.unluckyluciano, Phyl, maynard and 4 others like this. -
So... I'm curious. Who exactly is posting or writing these "lies" that you source?
-
I didn't think I was gay until I read this thread. I totally want to **** Joe Philbin, Ryan Tannehill and especially Mike Sherman.
the 23rd, Bpk, Larryfinfan and 2 others like this. -
lol. If you haven't seen any of those things said on this board, I can honestly say you aren't paying attention.Larryfinfan and maynard like this.
-
-
I think you mentioned this last year and I thought it was bunk. Then I thought about it a bit more, and decided yesterday (before reading your post) that you are right. Spot on my man!
And good for us, BTW.Fin D likes this. -
Yep, and you know what did it for me yesterday? Seeing Rishard Matthews come up big in the fourth quarter, out of the blue. Very Packer-like in that many receivers get involved, even when one or two are clearly better than the rest (Wallace, H-Line). Matthews is probably the fifth or sixth option right now, behind Wallace, Hartline, Clay, Gibson and maybe Miller/Thomas. That's saying something. Matthews is a quality guy - we saw that last year in limited opportunities. So, if you can give Tannehill six quality targets throughout a game, look out! Very much how the Packers did it those two years you mention.
Yipeee!!!MikeHoncho and Fin D like this. -
The government, most likely. -
Imagine having that choice!
-
LIE
Ryan Tannehill is not a top tier Quarterback and not as good as Matt Ryan or Luck!
TRUTH
He played nose to nose with them in back to back games and outplayed them both!
LIE
Ryan Tannehill is not a franchise quarterback!
TRUTH
He may not be there yet, but he is heading in that direction! -
-
-
Well, alrighty then. Not much more need be said.
-
-
mmhmm A straw or HIS straw? deeeeeeeeeeej?