[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWUpOVHKK-U"]YouTube - Kenny Britt Highlights[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a98USWn8dG0"]YouTube - WR Kenny Britt Highlights Rutgers 2008[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5bmvT8odZ4"]YouTube - Kenny Britt lays out a louisville reciever 2008[/ame]


:yes:

 

Best blocker at WR in the draft.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HYzZzufMRU"]YouTube - Kenny Britt Crackback Block[/ame]

 

Hicks is not taking care of himself, he is overweight which shows a lack of motivation to me.

Kenny Britt will be the best WR in this draft, he is a Parcells type WR, big physical and can block!

 

Nicks gained 12 pounds... And he's lost it.

 

Now you're gettin' it RNI!

:knucks:

And, you left out the part about how he catches everything thrown his way. EVERYTHING! That's why we have to take Nicks at #25 (and wait on a corner). Assuming he's still there at #25 that is. Man I hope so. Kid has some skills, fo sho! :yes:

 

I wouldn't complain with Nicks and Britt. If I could pick any wide receiver, I'll take Jarrett Dillard and be a happy man.

 

Britt is an all around better player. Nicks has many teams worried with the weight gain.

 

If we miss out on Nicks or Britt, my next WR wish list goes:

Dillard, DWilliams, Massequio, Ogletree, and Guice. In that order. :yes:

 

Unless you listen to what the Ravens said following his private workout with them last friday.

 

Exactly, he has some red flags popping up. :up:

 

Dillard in all likelyhood will go between 2 and 3.

Willaims appears to be a solid 3rd rounder, but who knows. He should be a "more productive" pro than collegiate since he should be more a pure WR.

Massequio will go as high as 49 to the bears IMO, but could slide back into mid-3.

Ogletree anywhere from rd 4 on is great value I think.

Guice is a bit harder to peg. if you really like him you take him in rd 5. Otherwise you may want to just wait. He could go anywhere from 5-udfa IMO.

 

Dillard and Williams should have the most highlights out there I bet. Maybe Guice, I am not sure.

 

So Stitches, who do you like at WR?:wink2::lol:

 

Deon Butler. ;)


(seriously)

 

I also like Britt and it would be nice to have him as a Dolphin.
This from Scout.com:

Kenny Britt, WR Rutgers 6-3, 218
Pre-Combine Position Rank: 13
Post-Combine Skinny: With his size, the 4.47 40 and 23 reps had to have moved him up on several draft boards. The deep speed is there.
Positives: Excellent size and decent speed … Isn’t afraid to use his size. Can be physical … Nice hands. Will go after the ball and will win battles.
Negatives: Character. Was suspended … A diva … Not a burner. Good speed, not great speed.

 

I doubt Dillard or Massequio would be at any of our picks on day 2.

 

The kind of WR I want is the type that doesn't cost a 1st round pick.

 

highlight reels only show the good stuff.

i want a WR that is taken beyond the first round.

 

a diva isnt a parcells wide out...

the kind of wide reciever i want is sammie stroughter with a late round pick..and nicks if he falls to us in the second

 

Really??? I doubt that...

A lot of people seem to blow one big play out of proportion and lable a guy as a great blocker because of one play. I mean look at Ben Watson, he ran down Champ Bailey on the 1 yard line from the complete other side of the field... Now when people mention Watson they always say how he never gives up on a play, he keeps playing to the whistle, etc. No knock on Watson but I doubt that is the case play in and play out. He was determined and made one solid play and is now defined by that play.

With reports of Britt being a Prima Donna and having a WR's view of the game I doubt he is the best blocking WR in the Draft. Yes, that was a great crack-back, but don't label a player because of one play or one game for that matter.

 

I absolutely LOVE Jarret Dillard. People keep doubting him, yet he keeps proving them wrong. It's like the Book Moneyball when Oakland Athletics Great GM Billy Beane switch his philosophy from asking why players wouldn't/couldn't make it to why players would make it.

I love Nicks and wouldn't mind using our first round pick on him, but if we pass on him and Britt and land Dillard in the 3rd round I would be extremely happy.

 

Robiskie at 56?

 

I'm sorry that no one made a highlight of every single block Britt had in his career for me to link. He is certainly the best blocking WR of the top 20 rated WRs in this draft, I am certain of that.

God, don't ****ing assume I base all my opinions on youtube highlights. I don't appreciate it.

 

I honestly wasn't calling you out Brother, I just was saying that some people say things like that because of one play. I know you and have read a lot of your posts. I have great respect for you and your opinions and agree with you most of the time. I know you are not the type of person that would just watch one clip of Britt's and say that he was the best blocking WR in the draft... :up:

Sorry if it came across like that man.

I am just not sure if Britt is the best blocking WR in this draft.

 

Can anyone explain to me why Kenny Britt is considered a West Coast type WR?

 

Definitely. A better receiver than given credit for. He's one of the top WR's in the class IMO and probably the best route runner of them all. Him and Nicks have to be 1A but I give the edge to Dillard because his ability to create separation is superior to Nicks.

 

I like Dillard a whole lot. He's bound to be the best value at WR in this draft, as he'll probably fall to low 2nd, even third or worse.

I mean, his size DOES concern me, but boy can PLAY.

 

This is a link to a story re; Baltimore working out Nicks earlier this week. http://www.baltimoreravens.com/News/Articles/2009/04/Ravens_Work_Out_Nicks_in_Carolina.aspx

No where did I read anything about a concern (from the Ravens) re; a weight issue. Mayock makes reference to it (but, that's from 4-6 weeks earlier). I personally don't see the weight issue as a concern. Especially in Miami's case with their conditioning program.

Of the more notable comments made, here are a few from Mayock:

 

I don't agree with the label but it's usually applied to a big-bodied WR with some short area quickness. The kind of guy you would picture running a quick slant. The idea is that that this kind of WR presents a good target for a QB and makes it very difficult for the CB to stop the pass without interfering.

The reason I don't agree with the label is that it implies that a big, quick WR wouldn't be useful in other offenses, which is ridiculous. Also the quick slant is ubiquitous and is probably part of every offense in the NFL.

 

i question anyone talking about WRs when they want a bum like Massequio. hes a 5 rounder at best IMO. he will be a bust in the NFL because people will highly over draft him.

 

He's 5'11" but he can jump out the building with his 40+ inch vertical. His height doesn't hold him back when he's catching the ball in the red zone, something he does a good job of.

 

I believe his vertical was like 43 inches, which is insane in itself...but Dilliard said he wants to get it up to 47 inches and believes he can.

Jarret Dillard is (5'11) 71 inches tall so if you add his vertical of 43 inches thats a total of 114 inches.

Kenny Britt is (6'3) 75 inches tall so if you add his vertical of 37 inches thats a total of 112 inches.

Interesting huh???

 

what about wingspan? lol larry fitzgeralds is probably insane if i had to guess.