Is there anyway to reconstruct Wallace's contract? He shouldn't be making that kind of money, I rather us give that money to Landry.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Wallace could agree to a restructuring, but he's got to agree. It's very unlikely that someone who has shown as little accountability as he has would agree to such a thing unless it was crystal clear to him that the market for his services would be bad elsewhere.
DeDolfan and Clark Kent like this. -
Aquafin likes this.
-
-
I love how he slyly throws his QB under the bus when everyone and their dog saw what he did on that play. Oh the play is too tough so I'm not even going to try.
He's been talking big all year but he has done very little. For someone who's yet to clean up his house he sure likes to point out how dirty everyone else's house is. -
:pointlol:
-
Yeah im over Wallace. Need someone in his place that will make an effort to catch the ball.
-
-
In his mind there is nothing he's done wrong, and he's correct to a degree. This offense doesn't suit his strength and our QB's deep ball just isn't good.
gunn34 likes this. -
Unfortunately, Wallace is in what can only be described as the worst possible fit for a WR whose primary talent lies in stretching the field.
Wallace was a great success in Pittsburgh and he'd probably be equally so in Baltimore or Indy who have offenses that push the ball aggressively downfield.
He couldn't have made a worse decision for his career than to come to Miami where the offense actively avoids going over the top.
He's a poor fit and it has a chance of becoming ugly. I'd be very tempted to ship him out unless the coaches feel like we will see a lot of downfield action next year.
If it's just about growth and offensive installation, we could very well see Wallace take strides next year, but that's based on whether or not Lazor, Tannehill and the offensive line can provide that opportunity.gunn34 likes this. -
There would be an almost 10 mil cap hit for cutting him, and only a savings of 2.6 mil. Yes you could spread the hit into 2016 by designating him post June 15, but why sabtague that season? Do you want him gone enough to stomach that?
No way he restructures. He's signed through 2017. I think he's likely gone after 2015 though. No guaranteed contract after next year and cap savings of 9.3 mil. -
-
-
Getting play like you got from Mike Wallace in 2013, that is sabotage. You don't think that's a danger of reoccurring if he thinks his pay is safe? You're going to bet on Wallace conceding there are issues with him, rather than everyone else when the writing is on the wall he'll be playing for a team in a year or two?
You think Wallace is going to be a good citizen when the team finds someone else who eats into his deep targets? -
But yes, let's go out and find a quarterback for Mike Wallace, rather than the other way around. That makes loads of sense.MAFishFan and cuchulainn like this. -
Flacco can do DEEP. -
Yea you can't give Tanny a new contract at this point, I would let it run out and give him a one year PROVE IT deal.
-
Obviously at this point if you think Tannehill is better than Flacco you might wanna take up a new hobby. That being said, I think eventually he will be.
-
Page 1 of 2