I looked at the Sun Sentinel staff picks and they all picked the Fins to win an ugly, low scoring game. My question is would you rather win an ugly game, say 13-10, where Tannehill struggles, but we get lucky. Or would you rather see Tannehill look like Marino, throw for 400 plus yards, but lose say 44-35, something like that. So we would find out that we do have a franchise QB once and for all, but the defense lets him down.
What do you think?
Ugly win or pretty loss?
-
Gimme the win baby!
21 vote(s)65.6% -
Let's find out if we have a stud QB!
11 vote(s)34.4%
-
I'm going with a pretty win. Call me crazy.
Pandarilla, Colorado Dolfan and Dol-Fan Dupree like this. -
I want the win.
Him throwing well against Oakland is by no means finding out that we have a stud QB. -
-
A win should boost the team/Tannehills confidence. It's exactly what we need to create any sort of positive momentum. A loss doesn't do that. Go Fins!
-
That's what she said. Been a bad boy indeed. -
A win in which Tannehill plays well. Boom, mind blown.
-
-
ugly it is...
the fact that we are once again in rebuilding mode
but it is what it is
patience, we are not going to play-offs
having said that, an interesting season lies ahead
my expectation is a very competitive team that consistently improves
Miami by 3:dolphin: -
ugly it is...
the fact that we are once again in rebuilding mode
but it is what it is
patience, we are not going to play-offs
without divine intrervention
having said that, an interesting season lies ahead
my expectation is a very competitive team that consistently improves
Miami by 3:dolphin: -
Alex Smith just got a new contract for a season of ugly wins.
-
I would take the win, but I really think that the most likely outcome is an easy win where the team looks mostly good, but has a few bad moments. I think this is important b/c the team and the fan base needs to establish stability. Getting rid of coaches and/or GMs every few years is a recipe for disaster.
smahtaz likes this. -
Win all day. I see we played well against Houston which is supposed to be a SB calaber team in alot of "experts" eyes. I think we do really well against a team with a QB who doesn't seem like he wants to play there. Hopefully Bush gets me a ton of fantasy points this week too. :yes:
-
I don't see what would be pretty about giving up that many points.
-
Gimme some more options...I never like two option choices. How about win pretty, but lose Koa Misi for the year?
-
I want the win, I want the win badly, but if we win and T-hill sucks, kinda defeats the purpose of the 2012 season. But if he goes out and owns the Raiders, and we lose a shootout for whatever reason, it really is something to look forward to.
Where was the "Tannehill looks like Marino, Dolphins trounce the Raiders" choice? -
It's all about the W.Even if it screws uo next years draft.
-
jboogie The sky is NOT falling!
The "ugly loss" option would mean oakland scores 40+ on our D, no thanks. What would New England do to us??
-
Pandarilla likes this.
-
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
I said lets find out about our QB, here's why....
We won ugly for 8 yrs under Wanny. Jay Fiedler was just good enough to keep us in games that our D basically won for us...I don't want to see us playing that way any longer....After having successful regular season runs we always died when it counted late in the season and in the playoffs...
Second, a win-at-all-cost win won't mean much if we can't follow thru with better play as he develops and we know what it's like to watch a QB do just enough, but not really enough, with (insert name of qb since Marino retired) only to find out that he's simply not who we thought he was ??
No thanks...let's give this kid a ride to see what he's got and whether we need to continue to look for one or not... -