I think he does a good job. Obviously screen shots have their limitation, but they show whats going on a bit better.
Good Analysis on Tannehill performance.
[/QUOTE]http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/thedailydolphin/2012/12/12/coaches-film-breaking-down-the-key-plays-from-the-miami-dolphins-loss-to-the-san-francisco-49ers/
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Whats that? Step by Step pictures showing our all-world WRs getting zero seperation?
RTH's fault. 'Wildly' Inaccurate.DolfanTom and NolesNPhinsFan like this. -
-
-
Just being spiteful to the RTH hate as of recent :tongue2:DolfanTom likes this. -
And mind you, aside from one, "some plays" that showed seperation on that breakdown were -all- completions. Go fig?Bpk likes this. -
If Ryan doesn't improve to the point where he can make the passes even when his receiver is closely guarded he isn't going to be a franchise quarterback. -
Edit: If anything the article is showing he CAN throw well up the middle and CAN throw very well into tight windows, because he HAS to. and there is a difference between "elite" seperation, moderate seperation, and borderline zero seperation. No one is saying the kid doesn't have a lot to work on, but i still blame a huge part (most of, not all) of the pitiful offense, lower QBR and missed opportunities for points moreso on the hands than the QB. -
Bpk, dWreck and unluckyluciano like this.
-
I guess I expect&accept the inconsistency of rookie QBs which leads to my bias, although I didn't want to draft him in the first place, the whole premise of rookie QBs coming into the NFL and lighting it up "MVP" style is pretty out there to me. Theres no real reason to say people make 'excuses' for his sparatic play. I also wouldn't call it sparatic. Inconsistent? Sure. But he can only do so much. When you have other teams, team writers, commentators, Jason Taylor, and Chad Henne, and plenty of others all agree he is doing damn well for what he has to work with. I have to agree with their opinion even moreso than my own on this one, and he makes it apparent. I agree with you in that He needs to improve quite a bit, but I also believe he HAS improved quite a bit. Upgrading his tools it will do nothing but aid the 'improvement' process, which is what he needs.
I'd love to blame the QB. I'm a young Miami Fan and its in encrypted into my DNA, But I don't think I have ever seen in any other season in my lifetime, or from any other team SO many missed opportunity and blown plays/points from WRs after being gifted with perfect passes handed to them in wide open space. The theme of the offense this season has been 4-7 yard completions. and then anything over that, even when wide open, is not expected to get points because the talent isn't there. But I guess that is to be expected when your starting receivers are 'depth' 'backup' 'possession' receivers to any other team in the NFL. -
-
All I see here are excuses for Tannehill's play. He is a rookie and I give him a pass. Still even these fast receivers like Armstrong were getting super great passes.dWreck likes this. -
-
Either way we both give him a pass and agree he needs to improve. I will say as someone who was furious at the draft pick -- I really like his potential.
Our blame delegations for poor offensively play are just a tad different. :tongue2: -
-
-
-
I wish more people would pay attention to things like this while watching the games. To me, its hard to fault Tannehill for maybe being impatient in the pocket. Our OL isnt giving the greatest pastt protection at times, and our WR's dont consistently get open, so Im sure its hard for him to not take what little he can get, when he can get it.
-
You can talk about Hartline's speed all you want, but you cannot miss that when their isn't a defender withing 10 yards of the receiver. -
-
-
Aqua4Ever04 likes this.
-
-
-
Andrew Luck...sacked 32 times on 537 attempts.
Under pressure: 41 of 100, 41%, 643 yards, 6.4 YPA, 5 TD, 3 int, 67.2 QB rating
132 (sacked + pressured) of 578 (sacked + attempts) = 22.83%
RG3...sacked 28 times on 351 attempts.
Under pressure: 36 of 62, 58.1%, 520 yards, 8.4 YPA, 4 TD, 1 int, 100.2 QB rating
90 (sacked + pressured) of 379 (sacked + attempts) = 23.74%
Russel Wilson...sacked 24 times on 330 attempts.
Under pressure: 20 of 56, 35.7%, 270 yards, 4.8 YPA, 3 TD, 3 int, 47.5 QB rating
80 (sacked + pressured) of 354 (sacked + attempts) = 22.59%
Ryan Tannehill...sacked 25 times on 396 attempts.
Under pressure...18 of 50, 36%, 266 yards, 5.3 YPA, 0 TD, 1 int, 45.9 QB rating
75 (sacked + pressured) of 421 (sacked + attempts) dropping back to pass = 17.81% of time
Brandon Weeden...sacked 24 times 463 attempts.
Under pressure...18 of 62, 29%, 207 yards, 3.3 YPA, 0 TD, 3 int, 20.8 QB rating
86 (sacked + pressured) of 487 (sacked + attempts) = 17.65%
In looking at the splits it looks like Weeden and Tannehill have faced pressure the least percentage of the time when dropping back to pass (sacks + attempts = pass plays). Then again I think Luck, RG3, and Wilson (not sure about Weeden as haven't watched too much of Browns this year) have shown the skill to hang in the pocket a little longer going through their progressions which would result in higher percentage of the time being sacked and pressured.Berezo, djphinfan, Bpk and 1 other person like this. -
So how do we help Tannehill develop, other than insisting he stand strong and take more time to go through his progression? -
-
For anyone keeping track, Andy Dalton has 12 TDs. In his last 6 games. Tannehill has 8 in 14 games.
Tannehill still has a shot to be better, but the TD production has to be very concerning. Especially comparing him to other young QBs.
Page 1 of 2