What Shanahan missed is that other teams have converted to the 3-4 in recent years, meaning the talent base for the scheme is less deep than it once was. I’m sure Shanny’s arrogance led him to believe he could make it work somehow, but to no avail.

And people think Denver let Shanahan go in order to hire an egomaniac. Quite the contrary. In three years, Shanahan will be out of a job, and Snyder will be back to square one. Again. Maybe he’ll hire Leslie Frazier, or give Mike Singletary his second shot at a head coaching gig (because the guy isn’t going to last much longer in San Fran.)

 

To be fair, the 3-4 isn’t exactly a fad.

The problem is that Shanahan switched just because he saw 3-4 teams winning the Super Bowl. That’s fine, but you need to have the personnel in place before you can switch. Green Bay is the exception, not the rule.

 

The teams that Shanahan saw running the 3-4 are institutional 3-4 teams. The Steelers, the Ravens, the Patriots. They didn’t convert overnight, they’ve been running that defense for years, decades in some cases.

The fad isn’t running the 3-4, but rather the act of converting to the 3-4.

 

We’re not in disagreement. :lol:

All I’m saying is that there’s a difference between converting to the 3-4 (fad) and running the 3-4 (not a fad; that defense has been around for decades.) Shanahan tossed out what works because he has the arrogance to assume that he can make the new scheme work, or that the new scheme will automagically work just because.

That’s why I brought up Green Bay: their mostly successful transition from the 4-3 to the 3-4 is the exception, not the rule. Even then, they had the sense to draft heavily along the defensive front seven to accommodate the transition, picking guys like BJ Raji and Clay Matthews, and getting rid of guys like Aaron Kampman.

Shanahan just switched for the hell of it, and became enthralled with playing mind games with Haynesworth. Shanahan is everything you think Josh McDaniels is times ten.

 

Pure egotism, a coach thinking that their scheme is the reason the team will succeed, rather than the players running it.

Shannahan has always been overrated imo, and the Broncos post Elway/Davis are exhibit A. He will ride Elway's coattails to the HoF probably.

 

...its 3 games into his tenure in DC, not sure why anyone is picking out funeral plots already. The important thing is that he has control of the team and Dan Snyder isn't making the personnel moves anymore. It might be a situation of taking a step back to go 2 steps forward, Shanahan won't get fired after a bad year. He'll get a few drafts to build a decent team. He has a good coaching staff in place and has taken the team over from the players....something that was much needed in DC.

 

Shanahan is not exactly the best talent scout in the NFL. In fact, his inability to get a cohesive defensive line together in Denver helped seal his fate.

Maybe he thought by switching to the 3-4 he’d have one less defensive line position to screw up. :shifty:

 

He's a lot better of a talent scout than Dan Snyder thats the important thing. He's proven he can build an Oline and run the ball which should help any defense he builds. Its still way too early to start burying Shanahan in Washington, he's won in this league it wasn't a fluke that he won in Denver, no one else won a title with Elway so give the guy an ounce of credit.

 

He’s a great coach. I’m not commenting on his ability to coach. I’m saying the guy had GM power in Denver and he laid the groundwork for his own firing because he could not stock his team with the players it needed.

 

What exactly is wrong? Assuming the score holds true, they've held Dallas and Philly, two very good offensive teams, to 13 combined points. You can't start calling the conversion a failure after 3 games.

 

Kind of a small sample size, don't you think? What are they in PPG?

 

23rd as of week 3.

Just because Kevin Kolb isn’t what Andy Reid thought he was doesn’t mean Mike Shanahan is a defensive genius.

 

That is exactly what I said!

 

You said that it’s improper to call the 3-4 conversion a failure after 3 games, and cited game scores to back that up, then asked what rank the Redskins have in scoring defense.

I replied saying they’re 23rd in scoring defense. That is, they’re one of the easiest teams in the NFL to score on.

Failing to see where we’re making the same point.

 

Except in half of their games?