...as the good, not great WR that he is. Without Moss stretching the field his stats will become pedestrian. I couldn't be happier. This piss ant has been living fat off the hog for years and let it go to his head. **** off Welker. You are average and now everyone will realize it.
Page 1 of 3
-
-
Disagree. He was solid as a fin and we sucked. He'll be fine
MikeHoncho, Tin Indian, TiP54 and 4 others like this. -
-
finfansince72 Season Ticket Holder Club Member
Still is a great trade for the Pats and theres nothing to say they can't draft another deep threat with the 400 picks they have over the next few years. I'd love to have a guy that puts up 80% of the numbers Welker does on our team. This is the only place where I read about how he is just a pedestrian player and wouldn't be anything without Moss, everyone else gives him his due, the guy is a player, theres not too many better on 3rd down than him.
FINintheMOON likes this. -
-
-
finfansince72 Season Ticket Holder Club Member
Welker's still in the top 10 in receptions....coming off a major injury. You can tell he has lost a step and he's still moving the chains. Guys good. I love Bess and the way he moves the chains does remind me a lot of Welker's role in New England, hopefully he can give us what Welker gives them.
-
It's gonna depend a little how much Tate will stretch the field and/or draw brackets.
That said, how do you even double-team a slot receiver let alone White Bess? -
-
-
He was rehabbing that knee at the Playboy mansion in the offseason. I think he was in the celeb party pics 3 months in a row.
-
-
I think he'll do just fine in New England without Moss, personally.
-
He will not produce as much without Moss next to him, he is an excellent slot WR but he has never been and he never will be in that upper ecehelon of WRs.
-
-
IMO Welker's stats will still be good. He won't have as much space, so he may not escape as much for YAC, but he also may be targeted more overall. The big impact is that NE's offense as a whole won't be as effective. The offense will still click for drives or even a game, but over the course of the season they will be down.
-
i think losing moss AND faulk is what will hurt welker...
-
SICK likes this.
-
-
-
7 catches 53 yards. Not bad. But not great. Not getting all that YAC without Moss.
Admittedly, tough Baltimore defense. Jury is still out. -
-
-
53 yards against Baltimore is a GOOD performance. Not Great. Those of you arguing vehemently against my statement need to take a careful look at what my "theory" is.
For you to matter of factly state the jury is not still out and they he will continue to perform as a GREAT WR is just as foolish as you might think me saying he's not a GREAT WR is.
IMHO, the jury is still out. I fully admit, Welker could prove me wrong, but that performance proves nothing.late again likes this. -
Their coverage was dictated towards Welker the whole game and it opened up passes for Branch. When did Welker ever score touchdowns?
With those tight ends why even go to him in the end zone? He is a chain moving receiver who happens to be great at his role. Time those numbers by two when you factor in that defense, and their focus on him. Game should of been over when Wess made a great punt return. -
Seriously, you're hyping the guy way too much and all of your points in this post and your last are 100% wrong.late again likes this. -
Name the points I am wrong on.... If he continues at a pace of 7 catches and 53 yards a game that averages to 112 receptions and 848 yards for a season. Those numbers would be better than good. -
I bet he does not get 100 receptions this season now that Moss is gone. He has 11 more games and would need to average 7 receptions every game here on out. I doubt he does that. -
I mean, if Branch can step in and flourish after being a ghost in Seattle for 3 years, surely a guy like Welker clearly benefited from being that guy moreso than were he to play for another team.
He's still a good receiver though, even though at this point I think Bess has surpassed him. Scary to think what Bess would do in New England's offense (shudders)MonstBlitz likes this. -
That's the beauty of the Pats system. Nearly any player can excel there. Look at Edelman, Cassel, Branch, Welker and yes, even Brady. The Pats passing game without Moss is nothing more than a run via short pass system. Short, controlled, high percentage throws. No one has to be great, just disciplined and good enough.MonstBlitz likes this. -
-
For those of you keeping score at home, in week 7 against the Chargers Wes Welker had 25 yards on 4 receptions.
MarinePhinFan likes this. -
-
Looks like Welker has reverted back to his good but no where near best slot WR in the game numbers without Moss.
So has Brady.
This season, w/Moss in 4 games he had 9TD's, 2INT's, w/ a 110 QBR, 253 ypg, and 71% completion rating.
After Moss in 3 games he has 3TD's, 2 INT's, w/ an 83 QBR, 225 ypg and 59% completion rate.
What sucks is that the Pats defense is playing like they did 7-10 years ago. :cry:PS17 and MonstBlitz like this. -
-
Brady with Moss == 0 Superbowls.
Those are the numbers that matter. -
Brady without top 5 defense== 0 Super Bowl wins
Those are the real numbers that matter.SICK, MonstBlitz, Stitches and 1 other person like this.
Page 1 of 3