What do we do if Flynn chooses Seattle and Manning chooses Cards/Broncos/Titans?
48 replies
Then Cleveland takes Tannehill are we royally ****ed?
Last I knew we still had Moore on the team, true he just lost a big target in Brandon Marshall but maybe Gates is ready to step it up.
"BuckeyeKing wrote:
Then Cleveland takes Tannehill are we royally ****ed?
I would think that for a few secs then hope we trade down for Weeden or maybe go for Cousin's later on. Though with Matt as our QB & our lack of weapons could mean we stink it up & have a shot at Barkley. I can't wait to see the "Shatt for Matt" (credit goes to whoever said this first) threads in the future. :lol:
Weeden is a solid option, as for what we shall do, we are dolphins fans we always somehow find something to be positive about..right?
Floyd/blackmon at 8 and then weeden in rd 2. That's what I would do if what you stated above happens.
I owe GISH a beer for helping me throw this sig pic together...
Man Up, Beer Down!
"ASUFinFan wrote:
Floyd/blackmon at 8 and then weeden in rd 2. That's what I would do if what you stated above happens.
Might have to trade up to get Weeden, it's not a sure thing he will be still there for us in the 2nd round.

"BuckeyeKing wrote:
Then Cleveland takes Tannehill are we royally ****ed?
Cleveland will not take T-hill at 4.

MonstBlitz;2232016 wrote:
It wouldn't surprise me if he is retained. Jeff Ireland is the nightmare that won't end. The **** stain you cannot flush. The Herpes for which there is no cure.
We'll languish in mediocrity and sub-mediocrity the same way we have 9 out of the last 10 years.
I won't pay for the NFL Sunday ticket
Grain alcohol
Headcoach material wouldn’t want to work somewhere they’re not trusted with actual football decisions.
"BuckeyeKing wrote:
Then Cleveland takes Tannehill are we royally ****ed?
we can always see who gets cut as a result of manning getting a new team.
"Frumundah Finnatic wrote:
Cleveland will not take T-hill at 4.
Jeff Risdon @JeffRisdon
Talked to a #Browns staffer today, told me they eval Flynn as "no better than Colt McCoy". They still like McCoy more than people think.
Sounds like it, they do like McCoy.

"bbqpitlover wrote:
Last I knew we still had Moore on the team, true he just lost a big target in Brandon Marshall but maybe Gates is ready to step it up.
If you're gonna bet on the Moore/Gates combo, you're gonna lose!
Tanking is like taking a Greyhound bus cross-country. Sure, it may eventually get you where you want to go, but it’s messy and unpleasant and uncomfortable, it stinks, the entire time you’ll be wishing you weren’t there, and not everybody along for the ride is going to make it to the end. - Quote stolen from Deadspin
Redskins are going to have an extra QB.(John Beck)
If Denver gets Manning they will have a extra QB.(Brady Quinn)
recycle bin.
That's why they play the games!:yes:
"xphinfanx wrote:
Redskins are going to have an extra QB.(John Beck)
If Denver gets Manning they will have a extra QB.(Brady Quinn)
recycle bin.
Maybe we can get Quinn or Beck as our new starting QB. WTF....this offseason is turning into a real stinker.
"mracer wrote:
Maybe we can get Quinn or Beck as our new starting QB. WTF....this offseason is turning into a real stinker.
I remember when people were pissed about not drafting Quinn. LMAO
Alright had to switch browsers. I know its unlikely Browns take Tannehill more of a worst case scenario. I'm hoping Tannehill is there at 8 and take Fleener with our 2nd rounder. With having three 3rd rounders I'm guessing we will trade back into Round 2.
Weeden! As for waiting till next year to draft a QB, didn't we say the same thing last year? No, we will win enough to be middle of the pack and our options will be limited yet again.. You know the deal..
I'm starting to get the feeling that Philbin is not that thrilled with Flynn. We're certainly not chasing him with a vengeance. Heck it doesn't even seem like we're putting a full court press on Manning either. I bet Tannehill or some other rookie QB not named Luck/RG3 is on their radar.
I "know" this won't be received well, but Matt Leinart would be a sneaky pickup with good upside POTENTIAL.
2 yrs in Kubiak's Qb camp, supposedly straightened himself out in terms of priorities, prior to arriving with the Texans he was about where MMoore was when we signed him, but Leinart is physically more talented IMO
"padre31 wrote:
I "know" this won't be received well, but Matt Leinart would be a sneaky pickup with good upside POTENTIAL.
2 yrs in Kubiak's Qb camp, supposedly straightened himself out in terms of priorities, prior to arriving with the Texans he was about where MMoore was when we signed him, but Leinart is physically more talented IMO
And mentally less gifted.... No thanks Pod.

Padre is determined to get us the ****tiest starter in the NFL.
First Vince Young, now Leinart.
fooball.
futbol.
hockey.
See..like a book I know you guys...:lol:
Vince Young is a poor fit for the new style of offense, and really, MMoore sort of is as well as they are more playaction/deep passers rather then conscious less slingers of the football, Leinart COULD do that for us imo.
You guys do realize we had the league's 12th rated passer...right? We need another QB but we are not as desperate as some would have you believe. It would be interesting to know how the brass compares Moore to Flynn.
Log in to reply.