if we traded him who would you want?
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Player for player trades don't really happen these days. When a player gets dealt to another team the payment is in the form of picks.
In terms of talent, I think Mike Wallace is worthy of a pick within the top 50 to 60 picks of the draft.
However, his contract is horrendous and we're unlikely to find anyone out there that is willing to take over that contract. -
Wallace wants to win and let 2 yrs of building frustration with this ****ed up coaching staff get to him. Yr 2 of what was supposed to be a playoff/improvement year and we were getting our a$$ hand to us by the 4-12 Jets
maybe whoever is on his Johnson should get off and take a look at the other side - the coaches that got him to blow up -
-
Now that I think about it Wallace probably does have some value. Other teams will see how underutilized he is due to not having a quarterback that can connect on deep passes. Im almost positive that if he goes to the Ravens he will get 1300 and 12 TD
-
Geno Atkins
-
Do they have a need? Yes, but it's a moot point because the job is already filled.
What they really need is a younger guy for the underneath stuff. They replaced Boldin with Smith and will need to get another WR of that type in the near future. -
No team will trade for him and absorb that contract. If they were somehow willing to, I'd accept even a conditional 7th-round pick.
-
Has he lost a step, was he hurt this year or was the QB play just that bad? -
-
-
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
-
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
-
I'd take a 3rd or higher. Our 1st rounder just might be a wr if we go bpa, our "needs" will be gone imo. Kevin white and devante parker are huge wide outs we could definitely take.
-
I wouldn't touch Parker with a first round pick.. White Strong and Cooper are the top 3 receivers. Cooper is going top 10 for sure, but White and Strong should be there if we want them.
-
-
the only likely trade you're going to get is another bloated contract in return... that's why a Larry Fitzgerald is somewhat reasonable. Both teams would seem to benefit from it. The Cardinals get a guy in Wallace that Arians is familiar with and he can pair with Floyd on the other side. The Dolphins get someone who is a redzone threat... it doesn't solve all their WR needs (because you're not pairing him with Brian Hartline and feeling good about it). But it does improve their team, adding a good veteran presence who won't cry in the middle of a game that he's not part of the game plan.
-
Just food for thought. I am not a huge fan on his attitude sometimes and lack of effort with one hand attempts when he could have easily caught with two (one example in endzone during GB game). But, we brought him here as a deep threat and to score TD's. We haven't connected on deep ball I get it but defenses have to respect the speed. This allowed Tanny to throw over 4000 yards. MW still matched his highest TD total for career (I know it wasnt the OOOH aaah factor long ball)
and was like 300 yards shy of top number...but still matched TD high and third best of career in yards. Why let him go? He is still an asset which opens up the underneath and middle if long ball isn't working. His contract sucks but he is here and I can't see replacing him based on the aforementioned reasons ...which is why he was brought here to begin with. -
Maybe he was upset because that for the 2nd year in a row we were getting our a$$ handed to us in the last game of the season. A game we should have won hands down. The ****ing 4-12 Jets......WTFdjphinfan likes this. -
-
If we let him go and don't draft his replacement, you can forget 8 wins next season, we'll be lucky to get 6 wins. Wallace's impact to stretch the field will be missed.
Even drafting his replacement isn't guaranteed to pan out right away, because who knows what impact a rookie will have their first season. To expect Odell Beckham production is unrealistic.
Get rid of Hartline, keep Wallace, draft a receiver. And then depending on how Landry and the new receiver respond to their roles, get rid of Wallace in 2016. -
-
-
It would appear that the only reason they would try to trade him is because they no longer feel he is an asset to this team because of his blow up in the last game.
Obviously others teams would be aware of the reason the Dolphins were putting him on the trading block and that is going to work against the Dolphins.
Because of his contract, I doubt if there will be much interest in him in a trade. The Dolphins will be lucky to get a 5th or 6th round pick for him, but they would probably take a late round pick for him just to be able to get his salary off their cap space.
I would love to see them trade him for a starting caliber guard, CB, or safety, but it's just not going to happen. -
-
speed likes this.
-
Torrey Smith...
-
Wallace has passion and fire - that's enough for me. He is going to be pricey. But that's why restructure's are done all the time. Getting rid of Wallace makes this team not as good.
I am going to go with my gut and what I know Philbins history has been with vocal players. Too bad we couldn't trade Philbin -
Page 1 of 2