This could be interesting if he gets in the game:
Couple receiver notes: Not only is Davone Bess still dealing with a back issue, but Brian Hartline is, too. Both missed practice Thursday. Receiver Chris Hogan -- who was nicknamed 7-11 during Dolphins training camp because (as Bush said) “he was always open,” -- was moved up to Buffalo’s 53-man roster, but it’s questionable if he will get any playing time against Miami on Sunday.
Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/spor...ins-and-tvradio-quick-hits.html#storylink=cpy
I still think that we should have kept him.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
So do I, had a good feeling about that kid, still do.
-
I am interested to see who really steps up this game if Bess and Hartline are out. I want to see Thigpen and Matthews be used more. That said, I am not expecting much of anything...
-
Well it's a good thing the Pats didn't pick him up or he'd be a 1st ballot Hall of Famer.
Tone_E and PhinsRDbest like this. -
-
So playing Hogan would mean the Bills are attempting some kind of psy-op?
Feckin' Bills...I don't think there's been one time where I was like "ohhh, watch out for the Bills!" They beat us every year, and I still don't give a ****. Points to a jaded sense of entitlement I have with this organization.
This game holds the slightest of intrigue of having marginal playoff implications. However, for a purist like myself, this game will be fun to watch because of the lack of emotional investment.
If we somehow slingshot into the playoffs, my personality will be even more annoying...so conflicted.eltos_lightfoot likes this. -
-
-
That's too bad about Bess. I though he had a pretty good chance to get to 1,000.
It'll be interesting to see how Moore, Matthews and Thigpen respond. Nice opportunity for 2 core special teamers and a rookie to make their case for playing time moving forward. -
Derek Hagan and Ted Ginn Jr. Ironically, also against Buffalo. -
-
-
He isn't very good.
-
More worried about Mark Anderson playing.
-
-
Bills may have had their eye on him for a bit, but thought its a good move to take him when we may need to put him on our 53 man due to dire shortage at WR.
nice timing to snooker us even more at WR. No Bess and No Hartline. Heck, could we even do a 3 WR formation?
Know what though? We don;t care. We still won't play Egnew in the passing game, no matter HOW few passing targets we have left! You can;t force our hand, Buffalo! You her me?! Egnew stays on the bench, no matter what!!!!
So there.oakelmpine likes this. -
Hope he kills us this week, we deserve it.
-
shula_guy Well-Known Member
Did he ever get time on the field during preseason against a 1st string defense?
I find it hard to believe that if is as good as hard knocks portrayed him as being that he could not beat out any of our recievers who were on the roster. -
-
-
If he wasnt "featured" on hard knocks, nobody would care. So... really, why bother? Sure we need help at WR, but I highly doubt Chris Hogan was the answer.
shula_guy likes this. -
-
-
All those other names you listed, even Naanee, were much better chances at being productive. -
-
Chris Hogan is unusually quick for his size and generally speaking I love when a player clearly has the respect of his peers which Hogan unquestionably does. That goes a long way with me.
However when watching him play in the preseason I was a little disturbed by A) The fact that he's so big and strong yet with the exception of one play in preseason he was easy to tackle with very little after contact yardage, B) How he reacted to the football in the air wasn't very savvy for a receiver, C) Had trouble dealing with physical coverage especially at the line.
Those kinds of weaknesses can kill a guy's career before it starts.Bpk likes this. -
-
-
-
He couldn't beat out the people who you think are forgettable.Fin D likes this. -
The point is, by most accounts Hogan performed well in practice and was well respected by teammates for his ability to consistently get open. A few plays in the preseason doesn't change that. If he was a stiff he'd be waiting for the phone to ring like the 3 unemployed WRs I mentioned earlier. The Naane debacle was a judgement error by the coaches, as in rating Naane at or near the top of the WR rankings, and then in the real games- there was a guy who pretty much defined looking terrible and not being able to get open. The coaches praised him regularly, then he turned out to be Ernest Wilford 2.0.
In hindsite, even as a matter of default, I would have preferred Hogan. At least he's an unknown quantity- Naane proved that he blows. I would have rather taken the chance on talent, same with Clyde Gates. So we kept Naane and Marlon Moore and waived Hogan before Wallace. I doubt that the FO would do it the same way if they were given a second chance. -
We kept Moore because he played well on special teams. Which would have been Hogan's best way to make the team.
Then Hogan lost out to Fuller and some other guy I never heard of. -
I like Jeff Fuller, but as to the rest you can cut it any way you want. The Dolphins chose at least 3 WRs over Hogan that are out of football. So why is Hogan on a roster and the others aren't? Maybe because the Dolphins players were right and he's good at creating separation and getting open. We'll see how he does with the Bills,jdang307 likes this.
Page 1 of 2