Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by inFINSible, Apr 8, 2008.
I apologize. I tend to read one thing that I disagree with and jump on it.
Um, yeah so where did I give the filmmaker a pass again? In fact:
Also, when was the last time you saw a movie that gave you sources?
No where did I say the movie was fact, but you sir, claiming its complete bunk, because you went to a web site that used unreliable sources and argued many points the film didn't make is ridiculous.
As long as its stickin' it to them dirty heathens, non-believers, Atheists, free thinkers, or anyone who doesn't just except what they're told...lol
It just drives me nuts when people bend the meaning of facts one way or another to suit there needs, beliefs, superstitions, etc. Often in the same breath no less.
I hear ya!
Lame. I'll take this as your surrender.
If this after all is the point of the movie:
The Bible is nothing more than an astro-theological literary fold hybrid, just like nearly all religious myths before it
Then the film maker fell flat in his face. So many people are treating this tripe as gospel, it's staggering
Surrender to the goddless?
I believe the irony was lost on ya.. oh well.
There is an addendum to the first movie with new stuff for those interested. Havent watched it yet, but I hear it's interesting.
Many can say the same about the bible.
- and I don't have a problem with that.
But propoganda like Zeitgeist is a perfect example of how atheist / secular humanists can be just as gullible.
anyone who uses one source as their proof for something has the great potential to be gullible.
infinsible was obsessed with this documentary. anyone who questioned it was immediately flamed by him dude was livid!
dont talk about infins that way!!
why? is his huizenga/devil avatar going to come to life and attack me?