Rushes:(Through 2 Preseason Games)
[table="width: 500, class: grid"]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]NAME[/td]
[td]CAR[/td]
[td]YRDS[/td]
[td]AVG[/td]
[td]TD[/td]
[td]LONG[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Thomas[/td]
[td]8[/td]
[td]24[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gray[/td]
[td]21[/td]
[td]73[/td]
[td]3.47[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[td]29[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gillislee[/td]
[td]19[/td]
[td]58[/td]
[td]3.05[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]9[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
Receptions:(Through 2 Preseason Games)
[table="width: 500, class: grid"]
[TR="bgcolor: #009ca5"]
[td]NAME[/td]
[td]REC[/td]
[td]YRDS[/td]
[td]AVG[/td]
[td]TD[/td]
[td]LONG[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Thomas[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gray[/td]
[td]5[/td]
[td]39[/td]
[td]7.8[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]18[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gillislee[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]17[/td]
[td]5.66[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]10[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
I don't know how well they pass blocked...so someone more qualified can take that aspect of it.
Another thing to keep in mind is that Gilly is a true rookie and Gray might as well be.
Page 1 of 3
-
The team really needs to do some heavy running in the next couple games and switch these guys around. Make sure we actually 'have' a running game.
-
IMO its too small of a sample size to come to any conclusions at this stage.Let the preseason playout .
You also have to take into account that the coaches see these players everyday in practice and they may have another opinion of these players.Bumrush, GridIronKing34 and Ohiophinphan like this. -
-
Kingtut561 and infiltrateib like this.
-
I thought Grey and Gillislee looked great as far as being decisive and moving the pile forwards. The issues have been more along the lines of poor run blocking.
Thomas IMO didn't look as good on an eye test level. He did cut back into a hole for a decent run but it was about his only positive play (not counting blocking) where as I think Grey and Gillislee just look better on an individual level.NCFINFAN likes this. -
Not sure if DJ is meaning the same as this BUT.............
You also have to take into account which OLine they are running behind, although come to think about it, they might so BETTER behind the #2 or #3 line because of the competitions backups.
And, I agree, stats at this point mean next to nothing. -
IMO there is no back up RB battle. DThomas is #2.
Kingtut561, Anonymous, Rocky Raccoon and 4 others like this. -
Main concern for this year has been and continues to be our running game. I just cannot foresee it being good at all, tbh. Hopefully one of these guys pops in the next 3 games, or else we're going to have problems; our #2 RB is going to be very important this year, imo, cause I don't think Miller is a 20+ carry guy, as much as people want to hype him up.
DT is frustrating as all hell, but I feel like he has the best chance to emerge as a dangerous runner. Gills and Gray bring some solid things to the table, but I don't see the talent/tools to actually count as a legit NFL 'weapon' - though I'd love to be wrong about this. -
I'm in the Thomas camp... but realize first and foremost, I want what is best for the team. DT has had concussion issues in the past. That's really not good for a running back. Maybe we keep both Gray and Gillislee, one of them for sure. Perhaps Gillislee on the practice squad. I don't think Gray would last there. The battle between them for the #3 is far from over. Three more games left to decide it.
-
Kingtut561 likes this.
-
IMO, Gray and Gillislee both have better vision and instincts as a runner than Thomas. Gray also has better power, speed, and balance IMO. DT is the #2 still simply because he is a 3rd yr veteran and the other two are rookies.
FinNasty, DHPVW, Ohio Fanatic and 2 others like this. -
What the hell do people see in Daniel Thomas? The guy absolutely sucks.
- Limited power for a powerback
- No speed
- No explosion
- Not elusive
- Doesn't break tackles
- Mediocre vision, running into his lineman constantly
- Made of glass
- Cost us extra draft picks to trade up for*
* Would be OK if he had talent.
He's had two years with this team prior and has not demonstrated any discernible skill set. I'm not even sure if he should backup Gillisee as a #3, nevermind Lamar Miller as a #2. I'll take a Miller/Gray 1-2 punch all day going forward. DT, pls go. -
Sent from my HTC One GE using Tapatalk 4 BetaKingtut561, GMJohnson and Alex13 like this. -
i'm really torn but i think we keep all 4 anyways
-
-
[video=youtube_share;T-ldND52bjc]http://youtu.be/T-ldND52bjc[/video]Clark Kent likes this. -
There's a battle alright, for the #3 RB spot. Thomas has the #2 spot locked imo.
GMJohnson likes this. -
-
-
I'm still hoping he could explode much like Larry Johnson did.
-
-
I heard a lot this offseason about how hard Daniel Thomas was working and how he was going to take a big step forward. I haven't seen it at all. He's the same RB as the previous two years, which is one that lacks power, shiftiness, and speed. Thomas just brings nothing to the offense. He is ineffective and needs to go. Gray and Gillislee are both upgrades, and both have much more upside, IMO.
MrClean, NCFINFAN, ssmiami and 1 other person like this. -
-
I dont think there is a battle. DTs 8 carries says to me that the coaching staff is fine with him. if there was actually a "battle" going on, DT would be geting more carries. gray is the only one who has to prove something to stay on the team.
GridIronKing34 and Stitches like this. -
you sir are correct -
They cut BJ Cunningham last year so it wouldn't surprise me if we seen our running back depth chart as Miller, Thomas, Thigpen, Gray. -
-
BTW, he is pretty much doomed considering he was Omar's man crush list. -
-
I think Thomas is the #2 back so far. I'm hoping he turns it around this season because I'm really not impressed with Gray or Gillislee.
Maybe we can pick up another back to replace Thomas before the regular season starts, though. That would be ideal.
Page 1 of 3