Yes! His elite level stats the last two games show the clear improvement in the oline

;)

 

Damn you!!! LOL

 

Yeah, cause the oline is the only thing people have talked about. His receivers certainly didn't let him down at all.

And sacks aren't the only judge of how well a line is doing.

 

Miami is 12th in YAC, so his WRs are helping him out big time.

 

Yeah, they really are helping when they do balls at big tones in games.

Regardless, what's they're YAC ranking if you take out the Houston game?

 

Wait...for QBs throwing 200+ passes Tannehill is exactly in the middle of dropped passes...16 above and 16 below. How can this be?

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/dropped-passes-by-quarterback/2015/

Of course anyone who has watched Tannehill throw this year will have observed other than the Titan-Texan games his ball-placement has not been all the good which significantly contributes to drops.

 

That was mainly early this season when he was throwing to primarily 3rd stringers. Sadly, they've become a lot more efficient since then.

 

Anyone got the stats for a QB thriving with a bad oline, bad OCs, abandoned run game and not allowed to audible?

Anyone?


Helllllooooooooooooo?

 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha....

 

You misspelled, "no I don't have those stats because no QB has ever thrived under those circumstances".

 

Let's see the past two weeks Miami's OL has played well, running game was excellent against the Ravens and set up the passing game against the Giants and IS allowed to audible. All this going up against two of the worst pass defenses in the NFL.

Baltimore defense: 288 for 459 (62.7%), 3228 yards (7.4 YPA), 27 TD, 4 int = 101.3 QB rating...give up 25.1 PPG

Tannehill: 9 of 19 (47.4%), 86 yards (4.53 YPA), 1 TD, 0 int = 78 QB rating...offense scores 7 points

NY Giants defense: 353 for 530 (66.6%), 4009 yards (7.7 YPA), 23 TD, 14 int = 93.2 QB rating...give up 24.6 PPG

Tannehill: 25 of 41 (61%), 236 yards (5.76 YPA), 1 TD, 0 int = 85 QB rating...offense scores 24 points

So even when the OL plays well, a balanced rush/pass (Ravens) and set up by the run (Giants), Tannehill gets to contribute to the game-plan (why the **** would they plan to wear out Landry right away in the game and Tannehill not throw early to Parker after the play he made against the Ravens is idiotic), gets to audible and plays against POOR defenses Tannehill still plays like, well, Tannehill. Actually worse.

Must suck that the very excuses used to justify him playing poorly have been removed the past couple of weeks and he still play poorly.

 

Who is responsible for determining and recording drops? Anyone know?

 

They have not played well at all.

I see the problem you think sacks are the only thing that show if a oline has played well or not. Makes sense, you think wins are the only thing that indicate a QB has played well.

You still haven't answer my question...shocking.

Your deflections are getting more complex though....soooooo.....good for you?

 

Uh huh...cool story, bro.

 

Typical response.

 

Uh huh...you know I answered you about a week ago. Do your own research or pay me. Your not the boss of me, it's not my job to do your research for you.

You obviously haven't figured out yet that you are the only who cares about what you keep asking.

 

The hell you did.

 

Oh, you sound upset

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

 

Upset? Hardly. Just calling you on the bs you're spreading.

 

You're so amazing


Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

 

You're so avoiding the same question.

 

No I'm not. I've answered you a couple of times now which is, I could care less, do your own research or pay me, doesn't show Tannehill is any good, and your predictable response would be to argue the OL and/or OC are good so it would be pointless and a waste of time..

Is that really hard for you to understand that is your answer?

Are you sure you're not just upset because Tannehill now has a record of 28-33?

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

 

No you have not. I'm asking for names of QBs that have thrived with certain criteria. You've never provided those names. You instead post crap that tries to obfuscate what I'm asking or these gems:

And that's just this thread.

 

for having such a low ypa his completetion percentage is pretty low as well dont ya think?