Not saying that McCoy coming means that the will trade for RG3 or keeping Bowles means they would not trade for RG3. But I heard some interesting tweets that suggest that the thought behind bringing in McCoy for HC is to then trade up to draft RG3 and run a Tebow style offense. Also Philbin is thought to be a package deal with Flynn. So here's a nifty new poll to have a little fun and vote on of the options who'd would you like to see:
Of the options, which one would you like to see most?
-
McCoy/RG3
18 vote(s)51.4% -
Philbin/Flynn
9 vote(s)25.7% -
Bowles/Moore
2 vote(s)5.7% -
Other combo
6 vote(s)17.1%
-
-
Guest
Running a Tebow style offense for RG3 would be absolutely ******ed. You don't give a Run option offense to a 70%+ QB who throws for 4,000+ yards and a +31 TD INT differential.
Stitches, MrClean and texanphinatic like this. -
And why does everyone assume that Philbin = Flynn? What if a team ponies up a buttload of cash while whomever hires Philbin can't afford a giant contract. Or what happens if a different GB assistant goes to Oakland (where a former Packer is now running the show as GM)?
-
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Baylor already run a ZR based offense, with a ton of vertical routes? 4th ranked passing O and 10th ranked rushing O.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/_/id/239/baylor-bears -
I like RG3 but when I take into account the difference between McCoy/RG3 and Philbin/Flynn the equation is a little different...
McCoy/RG3, minus "two" 1st round draft picks, 2nd round draft pick + ???
or
Philbin/Flynn and keep all draft picks
Philbin/Flynn makes the most sense to me.The G Man likes this. -
Luck..philbin
-
Bowles/Osweiler or Weeden
-
This vote isn't even close on two other polls on different phin forums. Philbin blows away the competition.
-
Anyone with a pulse / RG3