Watching preseason game seattle vs. tennessee. He completed 11 passes for 77 yards. He is really accurate but I didn't see him throw the ball past 15 yards. He may be able to manage a game but not a franchise QB. Hoping Garrard comes back.
-
-
Really don't need Garrard to come back.
first&goal, MAFishFan, Rick 1966 and 1 other person like this. -
The best case scenario now, to be honest, is probably Tannehill #1, moore #2 just for the next two pre-season ga,es, to get Tannehill 1t string bs 1st string experience... then for Garrard to return in time for limited work as the #1 in the final preseason game. Garrard starting the season is still ideal... though we now see with his health that it's almost inevitable that he wouldn;t make it through the year without Tannehill taking over for spells.
The other option is to cut Garrard. But I don't like the idea of a Matt Moore offense this season, nor throwing Tannehill into the fire with a half-baked team.gafinfan likes this. -
PhinsRDbest likes this.
-
Ohio Fanatic and MrClean like this.
-
A little early to judge Flynn, decided this after 1 game? Really? If that's the case: our OL won't open holes all season for Bush or other RB's, our Defense won't stop any team on 3rd down and we go 0-16, Moore is dead and Tannehill is our only chance except . . .wait, Tanny hasn't really seen or played against a first string D so we are likely screwed for the season, go 0-16 for Barkley?
A bit of an over-reaction methinks. :lol: -
Why doesn't anyone ever get accused of under-reacting? I guess because people over-react to over-reaction, but under-react to under-reaction.
-
Really glad we didn't get Braylon Edwards either. He looked terrible! :shifty:
-
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
-
MrClean likes this.
-
-
MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member
-
Man I sure hope Garrard hurries back! We have a chance to win 7-8 games with that guy!!!
This team is far from playoff caliber, imo you let them develop together. Tannehill will likely be the starter by the bye week, lets just enjoy the potential progression.MAFishFan likes this. -
-
altough when its all said and done i believe the statement "i am glad we diddnt get flynn" will prove to be true, but pre season game 1 stats shouldnt be the foundation for statements like that. we all know Peyton Manning will take his team to the playoffs. -
4 and 2 at the bye or else.. -
-
now watching him in that first game 3 times now, it's obvious to me that he is not quite reading defenses yet, he's kind of just playing ball and throwing to the spots where he supposed to, and doing a hell of a job doing that, my point is I believe experience is what he needs to expedite the learning curve..
One again, if we can compromise, I give Moore 6 games to produce a 4 and 2 record at the bye, if not, there is no reason to continue sittin RT sit on the bench.
I think with all the dynamics in play, the respect the team has for Moore, the RT stuff, the loss of Garrard doesn't move the meter in terms of worrying. -
Good call!! -
I thought Flynn looked fine.
-
-
Well, I have to wonder if 2 yrs from now we are looking at Pat Devlin as our own Matt Flynn?
I did not think Devlin had the athleticism this offense may require but he showed it vs Tampa the other night and I was impressed with him a little bit. -
-
-
-
Or season would be over before it began in terms of the Wildcard, lose 3 AFC games to start the yr and you are screwed. -
MrClean Inglourious Basterd Club Member
unluckyluciano and Trowa like this. -
Flynn looked good. It's preseason, people make too much of it both ways, good and bad