We've added Armstrong and Gaffney since the season began, is that enough to move the Wr corps from dreadful to passable?
I tend to think it does, especially with a view that if Armstrong does not step up, we have Rishard Matthews behind him to push him, along with Marlon Moore.
Does Gaffney round out the Wr corps?
-
Yes, adding him is enough
13 vote(s)27.1% -
No, keep churning the roster
14 vote(s)29.2% -
Wait and see
21 vote(s)43.8%
Page 1 of 2
-
-
-
I think the #4 Wr role is wide open, but for now Gaffney should be ready by the time we play Stl. -
-
I am very happy about the Gaffney signing, even more happy that Naanee is gone. But I still wanna draft a WR. Gaffney has played in the NFL for 10 years. But he is aging like a fine wine since his best year was last year! -
I think we have shot our wad this year.One bad contract is enough .We did sign Armstrong and we will have to wait until he produces.If you cut him you will have another bad contract with dead cap money involved.
Anyway there is no one else available at WR worth taking a chance on IMO.We should wait for next years draft to improve. -
He's ok for now. We still need to address the problem in the off season
-
For now it is, but a lot still needs to be done in the offseason.
-
-
The WR corps still need work. However, Gaffney was the best move available to us at the time. I don't think the WRs are going to get better and should be addressed next offseason accordingly.
-
Armstrong could be next to get his walking papers.
-
Though a part of me does not see us going with Bline, Black Ninja and Gaffney with Matthews and Moore all we have behind them.
Bline has problems staying healthy, if he goes down our Wr corps is back to being paper thin. -
Gaffney helps Tannehill with reliability.
But he is not a #1 and not a big play receiver. He does nothing to scare Safeties.
"Gaffney is a reliable pass-catcher, but he’s as close to a non-gamebreaker as you can get."
http://www.betbigdc.com/2012/04/whats-fair-market-value-for-jabar-gaffney/Hiruma78 likes this. -
Which is why I suspect Armstrong stays on the roster, you need speed on the field if at all possible or you have the Pats from last yr.
-
4.56 speed. So, we still need that guy who can back off the safeties.
-
-
It really depends on whether Armstrong steps up and is that deep guy they can rely on to catch 2 or 3 balls a game.
-
Well actually there are still two open roster spots. Makes you think someone is promoted from the practice squad.
Bpk likes this. -
I say try to trade for Mike Wallace, especially if you can get him for just a 2nd.
-
-
Hell a good QB will back safeties up. Does anyone think teams play the pass against NE because of their spectacular receivers?
Thats just my two cents though some will disagree. -
The NFL truly is a game of inches. Think about it.
Naanee makes the catch and holds on. He gains some confidence, makes a big play for the team, perhaps inspires a little confidence from the coaches and has something to build on.
Instead he fumbles and is cut. -
Agreed with Alex. He's enough for this season.
I don't think he's better than Hartline or Bess, but he's MUCH better than the other receivers we've had here after those two. -
-
Guest
Burress would ultimately be the final piece for this season IMO. I doubt we could afford him. Gaffney had 5TD's last season. At that rate he'd have only added 1 extra TD so far. Depending on which game, it could have meant absolutely nothing in 2/4 games (Texans, Raiders), or added one win (Cardinals, Jets). Now with Burress's 8, that'd be two more TD's and our season would have a whole new complexion.
-
Alex13, mullingan, MAFishFan and 1 other person like this.
-
Without swinging a deal for Wallace or Bowe? I guess we are in a "wait and see" with Gaffney. If he can at least be a solid #2 type WR we can have some decent options on the field with Gaffney, Hartline, and Bess in the slot.
-
HULKFish likes this.
-
Yes, for this season.
-
-
Larryfinfan 17-0...Priceless Club Member
Well, AA has been here for 4 weeks and nothing yet. We know that Gaffney is just now possibly back to healthy status. I think they are simply looking for someone to step up. Unfortunately, the guys they have/have had have not as of yet...I hope against all hope that they decided to jump on Gaffney more so because he was finally healthy enough to sign than to keep him from the jests (much as that is ok with me too) but it would speak badly of this group if that were the ONLY reason they signed Gaffney (to keep him away from the jests)...
More simply put, I hope they signed Legs Nanee because Gaffney wasn't healthy moreso than they cut Legs because they wanted to keep someone away from the jests.... -
No point going paying over the odds for someone now, keep those coupla picks for the draft and go nuts on CB, pass rusher and WR. -
As for Gaffney being merely reliable, for me I recall Greg Camarillo fondly enough to think reliability and solid hands makes a young Qb more confident even without the potential big plays.
Page 1 of 2