http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_3772_Monday_Morning_Waterboy:_quantifying_INTs.html
I really like this study. It's incomplete by their own admission, as it doesn't include defensive cost for the interceptions.
For instance, the overwhelming majority of Henne's interceptions have been thrown on his own side of the field. That's what helps keep his offensive costs low (1.0 expected points taken off the board per interception). But at the same time, it should keep his defensive costs high (i.e. the defense let up points because of all the interceptions).
But it also kind of highlights something that I've been trying to say which is that the interceptions are far overrated in the analysis of why Chad Henne was insufficient in 2010. You could dial him down to 10 interceptions, giving him an 83.0 QB Rating, and he still would not have been a good starting quarterback. According to the study, taking 9 interceptions away from Henne would have only put 9 more points on the scoreboard, taking us from a #30 offensive ranking to a #29 offensive ranking.
That's still not cutting it.
But on the other hand it would be interesting to see CHFF turn this around to the defenses and see what the defenses took off the board and likewise spotted to their offense with the turnovers they created. This was one area of inefficiency for the Dolphins...they were one of the worst in the league in creating defensive turnovers. If they had created more, the Dolphins' offense would have scored more...giving Henne more chances at throwing touchdowns (which would improve his stats) and raising the offense's scoring effectiveness, which would lead to higher opinions of Henne.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
Well CK, to me you make an inadvertent point, even "if" Henne chopped off 4 int's to get down to 10, "he would not be a good Qb".
The point is, the offense as a whole, "if" the running game were even approximately what we had in 09 the offense would have been greatly improved even with Henne throwing less int's then td's, the manicial focus on the Dolphins Qb play is mostly misplaced.
Collapse of the running game and the loss of 14 td's had far more of a statistical effect on our W/L record. -
Stitches likes this.
-
-
Miami gained 3.7 yards per carry. Teams like Baltimore, Atlanta, Indianapolis and Green Bay gained only 3.8 yards per carry. I don't see anyone complaining about their offenses being among the very worst in the league.
muscle979, RoninFin4, Desides and 1 other person like this. -
Anyway there's no denying that the primary differences in offensive efficiency were related to the dropoff in the ground game's effectiveness. But that in itself is a problem. Henne should have gotten better, not stayed the same, especially with Brandon Marshall here to catch 86 passes in 14 games.Xeticus likes this. -
-
-
-
-
Mainly the over 4 ypc/14 td's (or was it 17?) that went missing, 14 x 7=98 pts divided by 16 games 5.5 pts a game (or so) inow, wins vs the Browns and Bills and Stealers, we also lost 2 other games (first Jets, Lions) by a Td.
Imho, statistically speaking the reasons for 7-9 are plain as day, no points from the running game, 28 pts given up on ST, and about 5 td's short in the passing game.
98 pts from the ground, 35 pts through the air, and (+28 pts not surrendered on Returns)=161 more points
I say 5 Td's short in the passing game as imho a starting nfl Qb should be worth at least slightly more then 1 Td per game ie 20 Td's. -
Guest
Michael Turner had 4.1 ypc but 1,371 yds and 12 TD's
YPC does not show how good the running game is and for you to even pretend like it does is disingenuous to prove a point. And to even pretend like 4 teams is some sort of rule. Your sample size is now 2 out of 32 teams. -
-
Guest
-
-
The Ravens' starting RBs (Ray Rice, Willis McGahee, Le'Ron McClain) gained 3.9 yards per carry on 1st & 2nd down.
The Colts' starting RBs (Donald Brown, Joseph Addai, Mike Hart, Dominic Rhodes and Javarris James) gained 4.0 yards per carry on 1st & 2nd down.
The Falcons' starting RBs (Michael Turner, Jason Snelling) gained 4.1 yards per carry on 1st & 2nd down.Desides likes this. -
Thanks for the link CK.Stringer Bell and Desides like this. -
Although, his 20.7% touchdown rate in the red zone suggests that he'd also have thrown more touchdowns and it wouldn't have mattered.
Chad Henne needed to get his team INTO the red zone, with 1st downs...then he gets to collect on his (mediocre) red zone production.padre31 likes this. -
-
Did Chad Henne manage to keep his effectiveness the same even though defenses made their move and caught up to him? Yeah. With the help of the addition of one of the best WRs in the game. But is "the same" good enough in this league? Not even close.
When you consider that he got worse as the season progressed, with pitiful performances at the beginning of the year against stout defenses like the Patriots and Ravens turning into pitiful performances at the end of the year against the likes of the Lions and Browns...that's an uh oh.Desides likes this. -
Which to me also means better running of the ball equals more production, but the thought of opponents perhaps run blitzing more often as being an issue is also something that would have to be looked at and afaik, is not a "stat'.
Blitzes produce sacks, or pressures or disruptions, there is no metric for run blitzes that I'm aware of anyway, perhaps you know of one? -
-
rdhstlr23 and Stringer Bell like this.
-
Guest
-
Incidentally Brandon Marshall got targeted 14 times in the red zone on Henne's and Thigpen's 47 throws (30%). That's kind of in line with his percentages for the full year (26%).
I think Brandon would probably argue that he should have been targeted more often than normal in the red zone. But then, I'm sure he received more attention than normal in the red zone.Ozzy likes this. -
-
-
Is there a stat for how many times a team settled for playing for a field goal?
-
-
He'll only get half of a season to prove himself. Other than that, and he could do it, but if he doesn't, he'll be learning somewhere else or on the bench -
-
I'm hoping we'll be more aggressive this year. Bite the bullet, invite the blitz, and trust Henne to make quicker decisions. We have a couple guys (Bess-Marshall) who can shake coverage quickly and/or beat 1 on 1 consistently, and hopefully we'll add another RB who can serve as a check down threat in FA. The return of the run game should also create more favorable matchups, if it returns that is. -
-
I did like Cam as an OC though. Always have but yeah, I'm guilty -
Page 1 of 2