Article may be a tad too harsh on Tanny, but many valid points. Many of us have already voiced our displeasure with Ryan's lack of awareness, but be sure and read what Bob Griese had to say!!
http://phinphanatic.com/2015/11/24/dolphins-questions-still-remain-at-qb/
Page 1 of 21
-
I dont think so, id say most of the board kinda see's the writing on the wall.
I think to a man we all recognize that we have a offense Cordinator and an OL Who are not doing their quarterback any favors, but at the same time Ryan is a problem too.
If they do not agree with those three things at this point?? I would love to hear why.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
The very simple fact of the matter is that when the online plays well, so does Tannehill.
That's pretty inarguable at this point.
That doesn't mean Tannehill is the greatest, but most of the critisms will go away if the line plays at an average level. Then if you solve the OC issue......resnor and Shane Falco like this. -
So? Some nobody website with an article from a never-been nobody has an opinion?
He is nothing close to an expert.
I will write an article now. -
Still waiting for someone to give me an example of a qb thriving with a crap oline, crap OC, easily abandoned running game and he's not allowed to audible out of the play.resnor and Shane Falco like this. -
It's tired because you have no answer for it.
Tannehill may not be elite. But Tannehill has been done no favors in regards to oline and playcalling.Fin D likes this. -
If want to think otherwise that's fine but it's ur opinion.
U and me are not Gms or scouts just Monday morning qbs.
I just don't see the point of the same arguments post after post with same people over and over again. -
Why even look at that site? LOL -
It was on Facebook , and again its Bob's comments that raised my eyebrow. I have my opinion of Ryan and the dude who wrote this article won't be swaying it one way or the other.Shane Falco likes this. -
Honestly, if the oline played at just an average level in pass pro do we really look at Tannehill as a problem? I say no and there is actually a string of games to back this up. -
His team is 3-7 with 15 TD, 12 INT, and an 84 rating going into this game (obviously this game will help). Just as inconsistent if not more than Tannehill. -
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Actually Tannehill is a TON more consistent. Consistently average.
I think you can live with that if you have a good team around you, we do not. Matthew at his best is on a way different level than Ryan has ever been and maybe ever will be, at the same time he has had a lot of games worse than Ryan ever has. -
That's one.. 2 more games to go
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
In the NFL, it is the play of the QB who ultimately makes or breaks the head coach. That is why without a decent QB in Cleveland, Belichick was fired after a few years. In New England he has had Brady for well over a decade and he is now viewed as perhaps the greatest HC in NFL history.
All the the teams who ultimately make the playoffs do so because of the quality play of their QB throughout the regular season.
After 4 years of inconsistent play at the QB position, I just don't see the next head coach placing his job on the line by making Tannehill the future QB of this team.
The new head coach will basically be stuck with Tannehill in 2016 because of his contract, but I suspect the search for the long term answer at the QB position will begin immediately after the new head coach is signed. I really will be totally shocked if Tannehill is still on the Dolphins roster when the 2017 regular season begins.Bumrush likes this. -
It's open for discussion. -
-
staffords issues is lazy mechanics which tells me he's poorly coached..and I dont think he's fully committed in the offseason. -
Romo. 2 pick 6's and a 3rd pick in the first half.
Be honest. When does RT ever do that??? -
But I want to see him with a semi competent OC before my final judgement. -
-
Lazor sucks. -
Page 1 of 21